How do you solve a problem like "Trekkies"? And what exactly is the problem with "Trekkies"?

On the surface, it's an entertaining look at fandom that tends to focus on the more extraordinary fans who have been influenced by the great cultural juggernaut that is Star Trek. After all, the very name of the documentary itself tends to give away not only its subject, but also its intent. And the intent, purposefully or not, is primarily an objective look at the people who have, in some way, dedicated their lives to Trek. We see these people in the context of convention going and their own lives, but this is a small, skewed sampling.

For some, that is where the problem lies. Rather than balance the cultural influence with say, rocket scientists or politicians who have been influenced by Trek, we get an odd assortment — some would say the "freaks and geeks" — from Trekdom. The question, therefore, is are we laughing with them, or at them? I suppose it depends on which side of the uniform you live in, but "Trekkies" is certainly entertaining fare. I recommend it here mainly to compare it to the more satisfying "Trekkies 2" which should be out later this summer on DVD.

In the follow-up documentary, director/editor Roger Nygard and host/producer Denise Crosby present a more balanced, worldwide look at fandom with several of the originals, like wunderkind Gabriel Koerner, from "Trekkies." At least here we get to see the subjects either poke fun at themselves or stand up for themselves. Sometimes both! Ultimately, "Trekkies 2" shows that being a Star Trek fan has its own coolness factor, not to mention a universal cachet. But to put it all in context, you should try watching The Original "Trekkies." [Tim]