ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

I think saw MACO in Star Terk into Darkness

Jason222

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 715

Report this Jun. 21 2013, 3:56 pm

When Vengeance falls past the Enterprise want out of control then skims across San Francisco Bay and through San Francisco, destroying several buildings. Of the people fleeing when those build being destoryed I saw a one perosnal at least wearing a camouflage uniform. Only group people wear those kinds of uniforms like that I saw so far talk on screen were 22 century MACO. This might well first time I get to see 23 century MACO.

Vger23

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6799

Report this Jun. 24 2013, 7:28 pm

I think you're obsessed with MACOs. 

bunkey

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 686

Report this Jun. 26 2013, 5:19 am

Quote: Vger23 @ Jun. 24 2013, 7:28 pm

>

>I think you're obsessed with MACOs. 

>


Don't you ever get tired of judging people?


Sarcasm is my native language.
JJ Abrams is not of the body.

GuardianAngel1

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 21

Report this Jun. 27 2013, 12:28 pm

Quote: bunkey @ Jun. 26 2013, 5:19 am

Quote: Vger23 @ Jun. 24 2013, 7:28 pm

>

>

>I think you're obsessed with MACOs. 

>

Don't you ever get tired of judging people?


Lol! Don't YOU ever get tired of judging people?


"Excuse me....excuse me. I'd just like to ask a question...what does God need with a starship?" -James T. Kirk

bunkey

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 686

Report this Jun. 27 2013, 1:02 pm

What, did I insult your boyfriend or something?

Vger23

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6799

Report this Jul. 01 2013, 5:34 am

You're rude, insecure, graceless, and cowardly. You represent the worst of Star Trek fans with your sense of entitlement and air of superiority. You are by far one of the most unpleasant people on this entire message board. You come out here, not to discuss Star Trek, but to engage in conflict because you know that if you said these kinds of thing face-to-face to people, you'd get you head punched in. 


You are a very small person. 


Hows THAT for judging?


 


 


I AM KEE-ROCK!!

bunkey

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 686

Report this Jul. 01 2013, 6:50 am

Quote: Vger23 @ Jul. 01 2013, 5:34 am

>

>You're rude, insecure, graceless, and cowardly. You represent the worst of Star Trek fans with your sense of entitlement and air of superiority. You are by far one of the most unpleasant people on this entire message board. You come out here, not to discuss Star Trek, but to engage in conflict because you know that if you said these kinds of thing face-to-face to people, you'd get you head punched in. 

>You are a very small person. 

>Hows THAT for judging?

>


 


I'm sorry are you threatening me with physical violence? You've made me feel very uncomfortable and worried for my safety if any of my personal information may be revealed by accident.  I've taken a screen cap of this. Online threats aren't to be taken lightly.


Sarcasm is my native language.
JJ Abrams is not of the body.

UninvitedGuest

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 180

Report this Jul. 01 2013, 2:39 pm

Quote: bunkey @ Jul. 01 2013, 6:50 am

> >

>Online threats aren't to be taken lightly.

>



If you actually believed that, you wouldn't constantly go out of your way to be rude-online for no reason in the first place.

bunkey

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 686

Report this Jul. 01 2013, 2:48 pm

I believe that physical violence as retribution for comments online has been implied.  

UninvitedGuest

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 180

Report this Jul. 01 2013, 3:03 pm

Then stop making unprovoked rude-comments online to people. problem solved


 


Unless of course being online is the whole reason you do it to begin with which sounds likely.


 


 

bunkey

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 686

Report this Jul. 01 2013, 3:38 pm

So you approve of violent threats? As an answer to comments? Ok then.

UninvitedGuest

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 180

Report this Jul. 01 2013, 3:51 pm

Quote: bunkey @ Jul. 01 2013, 3:38 pm

> >

>So you approve of violent threats? As an answer to comments? Ok then.

>


 


No but you obviously approve of them; otherwise you wouldn't constantly try and bait people into making them in the first place.


 


Vulcan merchant

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 77

Report this Jul. 01 2013, 5:26 pm

Way out of line people. I cannot be the judge of bunkeys character, but it seems that at least in this thread people are just jumping on his back for nothing. Is this what Star Trek tought us? And bunkey, don´t be a sissy, no one has threatened you - it was just implied that if you behaved in a rude way in a face to face conversation you might be compromised. Let us unite against our true enemy : JJ Abrams and CBS. Lol

2takesfrakes

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3683

Report this Jul. 01 2013, 6:25 pm

... Agreed!!!
Let there be decorum.
Make your thoughts fruitful ...
and your words eloquent.


EvilTree

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 50

Report this Jul. 02 2013, 1:54 am

There seems to be very little conversation about the origional topic, was there a MACO?


Hey world, I'm here to comment on the message boards and keep my eyes open in case a new Star Trek series shows up.

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum