ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

Red Letter Media Review of Into Darkness

DS9_FOREVER!

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 200

Report this May. 30 2013, 5:57 pm

Quote: willowtree @ May. 30 2013, 9:51 am

Quote: DS9_FOREVER! @ May. 28 2013, 4:16 pm

>

>

>Easy to miss a key point, making the rest of the story seem hodge podge.

>

it's also easy to follow the story perfectly and think that it makes no sense and not like it


Your point?


Listen to their review.


They didn't get it.


I just found this great Star Trek MB!!  photo ac1685424929087bf1b7e7e0d734f861.jpg

DS9_FOREVER!

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 200

Report this May. 30 2013, 6:00 pm

Quote: willowtree @ May. 30 2013, 9:52 am

Quote: DS9_FOREVER! @ May. 29 2013, 8:58 am

>

>

>Which you obviously have...

>

or they just didn't like it


That IS their opinion and I'm fine with that.


I just found this great Star Trek MB!!  photo ac1685424929087bf1b7e7e0d734f861.jpg

DS9_FOREVER!

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 200

Report this May. 30 2013, 6:03 pm

Quote: fireproof78 @ May. 30 2013, 9:25 am

Quote: DS9_FOREVER! @ May. 28 2013, 10:45 am

Quote: bunkey @ May. 28 2013, 5:46 am

>

>

>

>Their conclusions being "wrong" or not is a matter of opinion.  I agree with every one of their opinions, so they are "right" in my opinion.

>And you stated "I think these guys got hung up on the bells and whistles rather than the plot." to which I pointed out they focused thoroughly on the plot.

>

But there interpretation of the plot is wrong.

It's obviously too complex for some.

I'm with you here. I think that if it is shiny and full of explosions in modern cinema, then there is the expectation that the plot is subpar. This is not a slight against ANYONE here-this is the general attitude of the movie going aduience, and Hollywood insiders.

In my opinion, a movie can have shiny explosions and have a decent plot. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Your mileage will vary though


Agree.


 


What might be the case here is the shiny might have been too shiny. Drew from the plot instead of accentuating it.


I just found this great Star Trek MB!!  photo ac1685424929087bf1b7e7e0d734f861.jpg

fireproof78

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 342

Report this May. 30 2013, 8:43 pm

Quote: willowtree @ May. 30 2013, 9:55 am

Quote: fireproof78 @ May. 30 2013, 9:22 am

>

>

>I mean this with sincerity when I ask this question but how is Trek 09 bad scifi and bad Trek?

>The whole idea is to take Trek a new direction in terms of character and world development.

>

I also mean this with complete sincerity. If the point is to take Trek in a new direction, why rehash villians and plot points?


Why not? One of the things I have personally enjoyed is the IDW comic series exploring some TOS plots but with the new crew. Not just the prequel to "Into Darkness" but different series, exploring "Trouble with Tribbles," "Return of the Archons," and "Where No Man Has Gone Before." Some are good and some are bad, but they give a great spin on the stories.


Again, Abrams got chewed up by fans for too many changes. I think he was going for familiar territory and got burned there too. Plus, he tried to comment on modern issues which may not have meshed well with the character.


I think it can, but again, your mileage may vary.

wissa

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4023

Report this Jun. 01 2013, 7:53 am

I was disapointed the went with Khan rather than a new direction, but having said that I think they did it well.  And the same people ending up in the same spots is a constant theme in alternative time lines in trek.  This is no different


We welcome st.com refugees! click on the image

bunkey

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 686

Report this Jun. 01 2013, 4:37 pm

Mr. Plinkett strikes again!


 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeyLm-pLVm4


 


darmokattanagra

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 386

Report this Jun. 02 2013, 9:04 pm

It should be noted that Red Letter Media liked Trek 09

They liked it after adopting the "Star Wars mindset" but pointed out several times that it was nostalgia exploitation for the dumb masses and ultimately concluded that if Star Trek kept going down this road that it would just need to be rebooted again in a few years.

fireproof78

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 342

Report this Jun. 03 2013, 11:21 am

I'll have to rewatch the review again because I don't recall them adopting that attiude. But, given their scathing review of the Star Wars prequels, the fact that they liked anything surprised me


RLM is one of those places that I take with a grain of salt and lately, have not been impressed with their reviews (and no, not just because they didn't like Into Darkness).


 


Actually, I think Trek needs a reboot every couple of years anyway. There is a cultural relevance that is lost if the same forumla is held on to for years and years. TNG and VOY suffered from this syndrome, and DS9 struggled to find their footing. I personally passed over DS9 for years simply because I found the station setting to be odd after the starships of TOS and TNG. Now, being older, I find DS9 more enjoyable, though a bit removed from GR's original vision. But, the war theme brought more of a cultural relevance than VOY had in its episodes.


Similarly, Trek became known for cultural commentary, something ENT lacked, and thus, i think Trek always needs a reboot to maintain cultural relevance.


Of course, I have argued that Abrams is commenting but towards issues that people either don't care for or miss the point.

darmokattanagra

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 386

Report this Jun. 04 2013, 12:21 pm

I suggest watching or rewatching Enterprise while you're at it. The show had plenty of cultural commentary. For example, the issues of terrorism and "becoming the enemy" were explored in the Xindi arc. And as "Plinkett" pointed out in the clip bunkey posted, the issue of xenophobia was explored (also with Peter Weller) in the Terra Prime arc.

fireproof78

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 342

Report this Jun. 04 2013, 11:40 pm

Quote: darmokattanagra @ Jun. 04 2013, 12:21 pm

>

>I suggest watching or rewatching Enterprise while you're at it. The show had plenty of cultural commentary. For example, the issues of terrorism and "becoming the enemy" were explored in the Xindi arc. And as "Plinkett" pointed out in the clip bunkey posted, the issue of xenophobia was explored (also with Peter Weller) in the Terra Prime arc.

>


I don't think its xenophobia in the same way that "Terra Prime" explored. Fantastic episode, but not the same idea.


Similiarly, terrorism was explored in DS9 and TNG, but ENT still explored it, and I think it still warrants exploration given the current culture. Even new BSG explored it so I don't think the fact that ID explored it diminishs it as a film.


I prefer to think of Admiral Marcus' reaction as "victory at any cost" following with Section 31 shown in DS9. To me, that mentality, along with "if you're not with me you're against me" is very relevant as Marcus tries to save the Federation even as he violates its rules.


Now that I have seen the film, i will check out RLM's review.

fireproof78

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 342

Report this Jun. 04 2013, 11:48 pm

Eh, the review was ok. I'll agree to the TWOK references (and mimicking) and found that disappointing.


Beyond that, similarities in Star Trek will never suprise me, so critiquing a movie for trying too much to look like Star Trek is kind of odd to me


Its not like TWOK hasn't had others attempt to mimic it in some way, shape or form.

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum