He'sDeadJim6400 GROUP: Members POSTS: 86 |
Report this
Mar. 08 2013, 11:48 am
Boy, that JJ Abrams sure threw Star Trek out there didn't he ? his movie was like riding a Roller coaster and when you got off you wondered what was the point ? well while some of us like the more mature sci fi version of the classic Trek series, others prefer a younger faster version Star Wars version, ha, choose which one suits you. 
|
heronymous GROUP: Members POSTS: 142 |
Report this
Mar. 08 2013, 2:42 pm
Well , Bill and the Team may be Octogenerians , but they look well , and there are ways to refine them physically , either cosmetically or cinematically .
JJ Abram's Movies are action movies filled with hot young stars ! But it didn't do it for me !
When I look at a movie , I look for maturity in the acting , and as well , thought-provoking concepts . Which means , you need a director with experience of scripting and camera work as well as overall maturity . JJ's Star Trek Movie was made for people unfamiliar with science fiction , with lots of action for younger viewers .
|
T'Paul GROUP: Members POSTS: 75 |
Report this
Mar. 08 2013, 3:42 pm
I love the original series cast in the television show. But, I feel like the reboot cast is a cast more oriented to acting in movies.
If I had to pick one or the other to have dinner with, it would be the TOS cast, I like them more. But I like the reboot cast in the movie.
|
DUKAT!!!! GROUP: Members POSTS: 59 |
Report this
Mar. 09 2013, 7:09 pm
I much prefered the TOS cast. Spock was a jerk in the new movie!
|
Species 8472 GROUP: Members POSTS: 8 |
Report this
Mar. 13 2013, 6:18 pm
The JJ show was fun but it was harldy Trek. It was a gimicky way to get kids into it, but its money that makes the warp engines hum. So while I would rather TOS we are stuck with Abram's best imprression of a Michael Bay film. God help Star Wars.
|