ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

Major reveal or just messing with our heads?


GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1784

Report this Feb. 07 2013, 5:51 pm

EW may have spilled the beans:

It is curious how often you humans manage to obtain that which you do not want. - Spock


GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2590

Report this Feb. 07 2013, 6:59 pm

Can not access. can you please give more details?

CORPORATIONS AREN'T PEOPLE! Soylent Green is people.


GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1830

Report this Feb. 08 2013, 8:26 am

I'm not sure. It does look like an innocent mistake, but they've misdirected us so much that I'm inclined to think this is just another red herring.

"The future is in the hands of those who explore... And from all the beauty they discover while crossing perpetually receding frontiers, they develop for nature and for humankind an infinite love." - Jacques Yves Cousteau


GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1784

Report this Feb. 09 2013, 1:48 pm

Sorry, here's another link. Supposedly, they named the villain as Khan but not explicitly.

It is curious how often you humans manage to obtain that which you do not want. - Spock


GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1784

Report this Feb. 09 2013, 1:52 pm

Mitch, I'm inclined to agree. Quite frankly, I'm over the "mystery" and just want to see the dang movie. I hope they don't try this stunt with a third movie. 

It is curious how often you humans manage to obtain that which you do not want. - Spock


GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1403

Report this Feb. 09 2013, 2:00 pm

Playing with our heads. He's probably laughing his head off over the amount of speculation over who this guy is. I think the best we can do is wait and actually see the movie.


GROUP: Members

POSTS: 788

Report this Feb. 13 2013, 4:36 pm

The following is a post by starbase63 that I copied from another Trek forum. I hope this is an appropriate thread in which to post it.  The bold text in the quote is a reference to starbase63 in an article from Giant Freaking Robot. 


Thanks to my postings on the GFR Facebook page on the article about the April spoilers, I was mentioned in an update added to the article:

QUOTE Did A Star Trek Comic Reveal Benedict Cumberbatch’s Real Into Darkness Identity?


The biggest point of contention since damn near the moment Star Trek Into Darkness was greenlit has been the identity of the villain. When Benicio del Toro and Javier Bardem were rumored for the role, many believed the villain would be Khan, and that idea has never really died, even with the casting of a very British Benedict Cumberbatch. The other big clue, assuming it’s true, was screenwriter Robert Orci’s claim that he would be playing an existing character. That led to speculations about Gary Mitchell, even though that character had already been introduced (and killed) in IDW’s in-canon comicbook series. Many thought the reveal of Cumberbatch’s character as “John Harrison” was just further misdirection to keep us off the scent.

But now, the first issue of IDW’s Star Trek Into Darkness prequel may have finally revealed the truth. And if it is the truth…it’s kind of bloody brilliant.


So who is it?

Robert April, first captain of the Enterprise, before Christopher Pike and James T. Kirk. He is revealed on the last page of the prequel comic’s first issue (see below), so it’s clear that April is involved in these events somehow, even if he doesn’t show up in the movie. But it makes a brilliant sort of sense.

April appeared in the Star Trek animated series, and his appearances in some of the tie-in novels have described him as British. As Orci claimed, April is an existing character. We all assumed that meant “an existing villain,” but Orci never actually said that. Cumberbatch’s character is a former Starfleet officer with a grudge, so April could easily fit that description. And whatever his plan against Starfleet, it would lend itself to operating under a pseudonym.

But here’s the real kicker. During a December visit to the Bad Robot offices, Hit Fix’s Drew McWeeny spotted a bit of concept art for the big-ass cannon Cumberbatch is seen using in the trailers. The name of that gun, as noted in the art?

“April’s Gatling Gun.”

If true, April would make perfect sense as a formidable villain, one with ties to Starfleet, and one who would serve as a perfect foil for a young Kirk still struggling to prove he deserves that promotion to Captain of the Enterprise.

In that same article, McWeeny proposes the April theory, as well as an idea of why Cumberbatch appears younger than April as drawn in the Trek comic. April’s original appearance in the animated series involved him aging backwards. Couldn’t that same concept be applied or modified to Cumberbatch’s April? That would explain why the comic art looks considerably older than Cumberbatch in the film. Could that mysterious ability also be why Cumberbatch tells the parents of a dying child that he can help them, as seen in the IMAX preview footage? That could also suggest that April is using the John Harrison name to prevent Starfleet from seeing him coming until it’s too late.

We’ll have to see what further issues of the comic reveal, but for now? Consider us sold. Benedict Cumberbatch is Robert April.


One of our readers, Colin, suggested a variant on the theory, that the April pictured in the comic could instead be designed to resemble Peter Weller, whose role in Into Darkness has been even more hush-hush than Cumberbatch’s. That would track with the apparent age of April in the comic, but then who is Cumberbatch playing? Perhaps April’s right-hand man of some sort, but that doesn’t fit with Orci saying the British actor was playing an existing, iconic character (we can argue about how iconic April may or may not be, but whatever).

But here’s a thought…if the “de-aging” thing is indeed going to factor in…could Weller and Cumberbatch both be playing April? All I know is, I’m not looking forward to May 17th more now than I have been in a while.

"Be one with the horse." - Kirk to Spock, The Final Frontier.


GROUP: Members


Report this Feb. 15 2013, 2:50 am

I like it.  TOS had too many characters with God-like powers, it's better if they don't do another of those stories.  It's hard to see how April is a big threat without serious backup though.  Maybe that's where the Klingons come in.


GROUP: Members

POSTS: 520

Report this Feb. 18 2013, 8:00 pm


This reminds me I have to finish watching TAS too.

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum