Star Trek Random community poll #2

Random community poll #2

3 feet tall	33 % (2 Votes)
8 feet tall	67 % (4 Votes)

wissa

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3938

Report this Oct. 12 2012, 4:49 pm

It has to be one or the other, and it isn't due to any genetic or medical disorder

Like us on Facebook

Vicsage

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 439

Report this Oct. 12 2012, 8:52 pm

Is everything "proportional", if you know what I mean?

Jim Kirk

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 861

Report this Oct. 13 2012, 5:03 am

Either way you would have major problems in life but I would have to go with 3 feet tall. It would probably be easier to go through life being small then be huge.

Kang - "Only a fool fights in a burning house"

wissa

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3938

Report this Oct. 13 2012, 7:45 am

Quote: Vicsage @ Oct. 12 2012, 8:52 pm

>Is everything "proportional", if you know what I mean?

lets just take that out of the equation and say they are normal size for both

Like us on Facebook

guillermo.mejía

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2843

Report this Oct. 13 2012, 8:09 am

I think being smaller might indded be easier. Society is already prepared for that size with kids. However 8 feet tall is a rarity.

"Aye. And if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a wagon." - Scotty, The Miracle Worker since 2265.

DS9_FOREVER!

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 129

Report this Oct. 13 2012, 11:58 am

I voted for 8' tall. I'm vertically challenged so I would love to see what is like to be tall.

I just found this great Star Trek MB!!

photo ac1685424929087bf1b7e7e0d734f861.jpg

wissa

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3938

Report this Oct. 14 2012, 11:54 am

I'm torn. At 3 feet tall I think it would be a whole lot easier to hide during the zombie apocalypse, but at 8 feet tall you would get to eat a lot more.

Like us on Facebook