ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

The Equinox

TrekFanVoy

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 12

Report this Jun. 27 2012, 7:06 pm

Did the equinox get pulled into the delta quadrant before or after voyager.Their was no mention of another missing ship before voyager was their.But they were pulled their by the caretaker to. I have wondered for years


Im a Doctor not a computer engineer

Hugues

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 537

Report this Jun. 28 2012, 7:59 am

Since Voyager was the last ship pulled into the Delta quadrant before the array was destroyed, it has to be B4. Logical.


DS9 RULES!!!!!

stovokor2000-A

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2001

Report this Jul. 01 2012, 4:43 pm

Quote: TrekFanVoy @ Jun. 27 2012, 7:06 pm

>

>Did the equinox get pulled into the delta quadrant before or after voyager.Their was no mention of another missing ship before voyager was their.But they were pulled their by the caretaker to. I have wondered for years

>


Equinox got pulled into the delta quadrant before Voyager did by at least a few months..


 


Over the years in DS9 there were a number of mentions of ships lost in the bad lands.


Photobucket

mark.brown

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3

Report this Jul. 03 2012, 11:14 am

dont see why they didnt have several ep's of equinox and voyager together before the 'trouble'

Broadstorm

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 828

Report this Jul. 06 2012, 6:41 am

Equinox set up a really bad contradiction though.  Equinox started earlier & eventually found a way to go faster, but Voyager caught up to Equinox.  Ransom had said something about how far they had travelled (a rather long distance) using the "fuel" but Voyager made it back to that planet where Equinox first encountered the lifeforms within the span of the episode.


 

*Passionfruit*

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 47

Report this Jul. 06 2012, 1:26 pm

Quote: Broadstorm @ Jul. 06 2012, 6:41 am

>

>Equinox set up a really bad contradiction though.  Equinox started earlier & eventually found a way to go faster, but Voyager caught up to Equinox.  Ransom had said something about how far they had travelled (a rather long distance) using the "fuel" but Voyager made it back to that planet where Equinox first encountered the lifeforms within the span of the episode.

>


Gosh! That's really a big contradiction, I didn't notice though. *head desk*

stovokor2000-A

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2001

Report this Jul. 06 2012, 2:21 pm

The only reason you guys are seeing a "bad contradiction" is because your memory of the episode is faulty.


Voyager NEVER made it back to the planet that Equinox first encountered the lifeforms.Chakote suggested thery go there, but Janeway refusede.


She later agreed to find a near by ship of the people that can call those life forms.

Broadstorm

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 828

Report this Jul. 06 2012, 3:05 pm

Quote: stovokor2000-A @ Jul. 06 2012, 2:21 pm

>

>The only reason you guys are seeing a "bad contradiction" is because your memory of the episode is faulty.

>Voyager NEVER made it back to the planet that Equinox first encountered the lifeforms.Chakote suggested thery go there, but Janeway refusede.

>She later agreed to find a near by ship of the people that can call those life forms.

>


This is why I rarely post here anymore.  Okay, maybe they found a ship, but are you at all capable of correcting someone without instigating an argument?  I sometimes catch something that someone remembers incorrectly, or they miss some detail, but at least I don't try to make them out to be idiots.

stovokor2000-A

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2001

Report this Jul. 06 2012, 3:55 pm

Quote: Broadstorm @ Jul. 06 2012, 3:05 pm

>This is why I rarely post here anymore.  Okay, maybe they found a ship, but are you at all capable of correcting someone without instigating an argument?  I sometimes catch something that someone remembers incorrectly, or they miss some detail, but at least I don't try to make them out to be idiots.

>


nothing I said was remotly insulting or should have instigated an argument with anyone who was being civil.


I only told you your memory of the episode was faulty, not that you were stupid,an iddiot or anything negitive.


I suggest you re-read my words with out your ego attached...........or is it that maybe your just over sensetive about being corrected.


Photobucket

Broadstorm

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 828

Report this Jul. 06 2012, 4:04 pm

Quote: stovokor2000-A @ Jul. 06 2012, 3:55 pm

Quote: Broadstorm @ Jul. 06 2012, 3:05 pm

>

>This is why I rarely post here anymore.  Okay, maybe they found a ship, but are you at all capable of correcting someone without instigating an argument?  I sometimes catch something that someone remembers incorrectly, or they miss some detail, but at least I don't try to make them out to be idiots.

>

nothing I said was remotly insulting or should have instigated an argument with anyone who was being civil.

I only told you your memory of the episode was faulty, not that you were stupid,an iddiot or anything negitive.

I suggest you re-read my words with out your ego attached...........or is it that maybe your just over sensetive about being corrected.


Then just say "Actually, they found a ship."  I would not be overly sensitive about that or find it insulting.  The "faulty" comment is what I have a problem with.  That in a long line of your comments directed at various people, not just at me.  This along with other comments of your like "full frontal fail"  "you're 100% wrong" "don't people do any research before posting here?" etc.  I doubt I am the only one that considers the frequency of your usage of "not to be rude, but"  to strongly suggest otherwise, and what usually follows to confirm otherwise.  BTW, the examples I just mentioned are comments you used on others rather than referring to the belligerent comments you have thrown my way.

stovokor2000-A

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2001

Report this Jul. 06 2012, 4:22 pm

Quote: Broadstorm @ Jul. 06 2012, 4:04 pm

>

>Then just say "Actually, they found a ship."  I would not be overly sensitive about that or find it insulting.  The "faulty" comment is what I have a problem with.  That in a long line of your comments directed at various people, not just at me.  This along with other comments of your like "full frontal fail"  "you're 100% wrong" "don't people do any research before posting here?" etc.  I doubt I am the only one that considers the frequency of your usage of "not to be rude, but"  to strongly suggest otherwise, and what usually follows to confirm otherwise.  BTW, the examples I just mentioned are comments you used on others rather than referring to the belligerent comments you have thrown my way.

>


So now your going to suggest my vocab for me?


And I'm sorry buddy, but never in my life have I ever typed the words ""full frontal fail", so either your confusing me with someone else or you just made thsat up.


Please, I beg you, show me an example of my posting those words to anyone here.


And while I admit to sometimes useing the term "not to be rude" and "your wrong/incorrect" I only do so when it so fits.


Telling someone they are wrong, remember something incorrectly/memory is faulkty is quite far from being belligerent,


 


Photobucket

Broadstorm

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 828

Report this Jul. 06 2012, 4:30 pm

Quote: stovokor2000-A @ Jul. 06 2012, 4:22 pm

Quote: Broadstorm @ Jul. 06 2012, 4:04 pm

>

>

>Then just say "Actually, they found a ship."  I would not be overly sensitive about that or find it insulting.  The "faulty" comment is what I have a problem with.  That in a long line of your comments directed at various people, not just at me.  This along with other comments of your like "full frontal fail"  "you're 100% wrong" "don't people do any research before posting here?" etc.  I doubt I am the only one that considers the frequency of your usage of "not to be rude, but"  to strongly suggest otherwise, and what usually follows to confirm otherwise.  BTW, the examples I just mentioned are comments you used on others rather than referring to the belligerent comments you have thrown my way.

>

So now your going to suggest my vocab for me?

And I'm sorry buddy, but never in my life have I ever typed the words ""full frontal fail", so either your confusing me with someone else or you just made thsat up.

Please, I beg you, show me an example of my posting those words to anyone here.

And while I admit to sometimes useing the term "not to be rude" and "your wrong/incorrect" I only do so when it so fits.

Telling someone they are wrong, remember something incorrectly/memory is faulkty is quite far from being belligerent,

 


- the BoPs weren't using cloaks, but rather some other kind of stealth technology


 


sorry dude but thats a full frontal fail.


 


if it acts like a duck, and quacks like a duck  its likely a duck.Even if it was in reality a different form of tech, it still would have been viewed as a very dangerous tech and would have been in the records.


That was March 31 in The reason Enterprise died.


It is not just what you say, but how you say it.  I have pointed out things that people have remembered incorrectly, but I just stick to pointing out whatever detail it was without the extra comments.

stovokor2000-A

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2001

Report this Jul. 06 2012, 4:43 pm

Quote: Broadstorm @ Jul. 06 2012, 4:30 pm

>That was March 31 in The reason Enterprise died.

>It is not just what you say, but how you say it.  I have pointed out things that people have remembered incorrectly, but I just stick to pointing out whatever detail it was without the extra comments.

>


I'm the first to admit when I'm proven wrong.


But in my defence, that was between me and mermbe Mitch95 we have a open style of debating that others sometimes think is aggressive when we are just having a bit of fun with each other and the topic.


Ether way I never intended on my comments here to be taken as anything other thern factual.There was no insult intrended in my words, and I'm sorry you felt otherwise.


 




Photobucket

Recently logged in

Users browsing this forum: Drunkin Druid

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum