|
Report this
Jun. 25 2012, 6:38 pm
Quote: dryson @ Jun. 22 2012, 11:06 pm | >
> On a historical note America concerning the Confederate States and the KKK
>I have been thinking about this for a long time and have come to realize that the KKK was not part of the Confederate States. The KKK has made trouble for both sides after the war was over with between the states and continues to through the current day.
>We know that the Queen of England came to the aid of the Confederates during the Civil War not for mutual aid and assistance but to take America back for England so that tyranny could be brought back into America so that the colonies could be returned to England. After which because of the industrial might that England would have England would have assaulted America to regain the colonies lost during the Revolutionary War.
>We know that England brought slaves to America. Through the KKK England tried to keep both sides North and South uniting together so that through the American industrial machine England would not become an extended American Nation.
>Thankfully because of the Souths loss during the Civil War England's attempt to regain the American colonies was thwarted.
>Because of the Souths loss the liberties and salvation of a young American Nation was made complete.
>America owes its freedom in part to the Souths loss during the Civil War because if the South would have won England would have destroyed the Constitution of the United States thus returning America to a state of absolute rule by monarchy without any rights.
>The CSA will be forever remembered as securing the blessings of Liberty in America with its loss and sacrifice during the Civil War.
>....Now to find where the Queen has placed her men....so we can get rid of them
> |
The KKK was founded after the war by Nathan Bedford Forest, who had served in the confederate army as a calvery officer.
After that your history is a bit flawed.
Enland remained neutral through most of the war. They did not wish to offend the USA who, by that time, had become an important trading partner. Neither did they want to give the CSA any excuse to stop shipments of inexpensive southern cotton. Near the end of the war Jefferson Davis tried to eliscit the aid of Great Britain by promising an end to the slave trade in the south. By this time it was obvious that the CSA would not win and England lent its support to the USA.
England did not bring slaves to either the USA or the CSA. By this point in history, slavery and the slave trade had long been outlawed in Great Btritain. It is also unlikely that England would have used an even more unlikely southern victory as an excuse to take back anything.
If the south had won they would not have taken over the north. Their veiw of the war was that the north was an invassion force they were trying to expell from their borders. Any attempt by England to take over the CSA would have been met with swift action from the Union, and the south would have welcomed that action even if it meant ceding backi to the USA.
England would be better off, in your scenerio, offering assitance to the CSA in securing it's borders against future attempts to retake the south by the Union. Still a very unlikely scenerio however.
CORPORATIONS AREN'T PEOPLE! Soylent Green is people.
|