Star Trek

Just a suggestion, you may want to fix all your typo's before you begin saying someone is ignorant because they disagree with your viewpoint. "I'm not trying to condone their or the viloent actions of anyone."

You mispelled violent, and the word then, you spelled it "thern."

And before you go calling me childish again, I'll say I realize the spelling is something nit picky, I'm simply trying to make a point. You're calling me childish because I don't agree with you, and say that I'm ignorant, but you sound ignorant yourself.

And you say aren't trying to condone the actions that were committed against the United States on 9/11, but then you went right and condoned it. You pretty much said it's not cool to fly planes into buildings, but they had good reasons for doing it, so we just need let it go now.

You specifically said they have a problem with our country and policies, okay, that part is fine. They don't have to like our policies, BUT instead of dealing with that rationally, they just went and killed people because they didn't get their way. It was the adult version of a 2 year old throwing a tantrum.

Regardless of how they may feel about our "officials" and our government, the people who died had nothing to do with that. Innocent men, women and children died because they don't know how to behave in a civilized manner. Once again I will say the word "they" is intended to be the radical group responsible, not the entire middle east. Just like how it's our political parties and government that they don't like, but they kill us just the same.

But it's all okay because they had a good reason

pointing out my mis-spellings isint going to make your failing argument any stronger.

and I dont recall calling you childish in this argument, and I'm calling you ignorant because you seem to be unknoewing of masny historical facts as they apply to this issue.

And mis-sdpelling and grammar issues is not a good indicator of ignorance or a lack of intelegence, poor spelling/grammar is more commonly a indicator of

: a) too much text talking

; b) not caring

; c) too lazy to type

; d) enjoy using local vernacular or personal short hand

and most of all

; e) a learning disability

So, again your ignorance of a particular topic rears its ugly head.

And you say aren't trying to condone the actions that were committed against the United States on 9/11, but then you went right and condoned it. You pretty much said it's not cool to fly planes into buildings, but they had good reasons for doing it, so we just need let it go now.

Sorry, but I did no such thing.Prehaps you need a referesher in reading comprehension skills.

Your original post spoke of them as if they attacked us for no reason other then that we dont believe what they do.They they attacked us only because they dont like us.

My responce was to that poor line of thinking.

You specifically said they have a problem with our country and policies, okay, that part is fine. They don't have to like our policies, BUT instead of dealing with that rationally, they just went and killed people because they didn't get their way. It was the adult version of a 2 year old throwing a tantrum.

Do you have any idea of what some of our policies have done to their countery[ies] over the years?Dude, really, pick up a history book.

Regardless of how they may feel about our "officials" and our government, the people who died had nothing to do with that. Innocent men, women and children died because they don't know how to behave in a civilized manner. Once again I will say the word "they" is intended to be the radical group responsible, not the entire middle east. Just like how it's our political parties and government that they don't like, but they kill us just the same.

Do you know who trained and brought that "radical group" to power?

Well I won't even lie about it, reading comprehension is not one of my strong suits lol

Mainly if I attempt to read too quickly.

I propose peace, you are a fellow Star Trek fan and I respect that.

You have your political views, and I have mine. I too respect that.

I've found that many of the fans here all share two things in common, a love for Star Trek, and extremely strong-willed, opinoniated politics views.

We all feel strongly about things, and all feel we are right in our own respect.

So I will agree to disagree

your proposal is accepted.And no hard feeling bud

Of course not, none at all.

I would have liked to see the history of T'Pol's father, the possible exploration of the Romulan war (they did kind of leave a slight cliffhanger at the end of the episode "Kir'Shara"), the possible "faked death" (that I've read about elsewhere) of Trip and his possible return, and perhaps other possibilities of storylines.  Several years passed between "Terra Prime" and "These Are The Voyages."