Kate McCoy GROUP: Members POSTS: 135 |
Report this
Apr. 15 2012, 12:07 pm
A transwarp Drive itself can't be destroyed unless the cube is Destroyed..... Any The Big Big Ships in Starwars Can't defend them selves If I remember right they always had escorts.... It took hours to destory the Cube that was around earth using lots of ships of varying sizes so I doubt the empires weapons can destroy a cube that easily or ever.... and Species 8472 Isn't even technically from our universe so nobody could beat them not even your precisious empire
|
Cpt_krk_wna-b GROUP: Members POSTS: 365 |
Report this
Apr. 15 2012, 3:18 pm
Borg, no contest!

Ha! Nobody voted for Galactic Empire! Glad people are smart, but that takes away debate!
|
chr33355 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1543 |
Report this
Apr. 15 2012, 5:10 pm
Quote: Camorite @ Apr. 15 2012, 9:24 am | >Here are some points I need to comment on. First, from what I have seen the basics of trek an wars tech is relatively the same, they only took different directions with it. Wars went with grandiose overpowered monster ships, counting on smaller ships for defence in battles. while trek goes with a more conservative praticle design that is much more maneuverable. But not nearly manuverable enough to dodge heavy turbolaser fire
>
>Second, in the end there is no difference between blasters an phasers. They are both energy based weapons and therefore WILL BE ADAPTED TOO. I do be live that light sabers, though still energy based weapons, would be effective due to there design and the people that would be using it. Btw, for the person that mentioned obi won not being able to cut through a shield, that is because it was a blast shield which is many many times more powerful then a borg personal shield. There is a difference between blasters and phasers is that blasers are direct energy weapons where as phasers do some kind of exotic chain reaction. This is why phasers have different effects on different materials where as blasters have the same effect on all unshielded materials.
>
>Lastly, assimilation tubules are able to perpetrate just about any defence conceivable. Stormtrooper/clone armor would have no chance of stopping this once the drones adapted to their weapons. Except troopers do have non energy based weapons to attack with even if the blasters are not powerful enough to over whelm the borg shield as seen in Regeneration |

|
chr33355 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1543 |
Report this
Apr. 15 2012, 5:17 pm
Quote: Kate McCoy @ Apr. 15 2012, 12:07 pm | >
>A transwarp Drive itself can't be destroyed unless the cube is Destroyed..... Any The Big Big Ships in Starwars Can't defend them selves If I remember right they always had escorts.... It took hours to destory the Cube that was around earth using lots of ships of varying sizes so I doubt the empires weapons can destroy a cube that easily or ever.... and Species 8472 Isn't even technically from our universe so nobody could beat them not even your precisious empire
> |
I was talking about the transwarp hubs. Large captial ships have trouble defending themselves from figher craft hence why most captial ships in Wars carry fighters. Since the Borg have never been seen using anything smaller than the blockade runner from A New Hope this "weakness" is meaningless. Given that a medium turbolaser has a firepower of 200 gigatons per shot they will easily be able to kill a borg cube. Nobody could beat 8472 so then voyager didn't come up with a method of killing them easily? As for beating them doesn't seem difficult just kill a couple of dozen and they run for the hills.
|
Chidori GROUP: Members POSTS: 72 |
Report this
Apr. 16 2012, 1:48 pm
Voyager was the first to successfully combine their tech with borg tech, and was then able to deal damage to 8472. A Borg cube ship could take out a bioship by ramming it, but it would destroy both. The power from linking 9 bioships together (8 in a ring and the 9th to aim and fire) was enough to take out a planet, much like the Death Star. In STO, their name is given as the Undine.
Borg do have other ship types though; the cube is just their standard ship. There's a list at http://starchive.cs.umanitoba.ca/?ships/borg/ with what tv episode they were in. Also, as the Borg assimilate (at one point, even Voyager), they can simply add enemy ships to their ranks via assimilation.
It's all just fyi.
Oh, and chr33355, even if I disagree with what you say, I'll defend your right to say it. A stoic master of defense if ever I met one. 

"They like you very much, but they are not the hell your whales."
|
Camorite GROUP: Members POSTS: 5508 |
Report this
Apr. 16 2012, 4:51 pm
Quote: chr33355 @ Apr. 15 2012, 5:10 pm | Quote: Camorite @ Apr. 15 2012, 9:24 am | >Here are some points I need to comment on. First, from what I have seen the basics of trek an wars tech is relatively the same, they only took different directions with it. Wars went with grandiose overpowered monster ships, counting on smaller ships for defence in battles. while trek goes with a more conservative praticle design that is much more maneuverable. But not nearly manuverable enough to dodge heavy turbolaser fire
>
>Second, in the end there is no difference between blasters an phasers. They are both energy based weapons and therefore WILL BE ADAPTED TOO. I do be live that light sabers, though still energy based weapons, would be effective due to there design and the people that would be using it. Btw, for the person that mentioned obi won not being able to cut through a shield, that is because it was a blast shield which is many many times more powerful then a borg personal shield. There is a difference between blasters and phasers is that blasers are direct energy weapons where as phasers do some kind of exotic chain reaction. This is why phasers have different effects on different materials where as blasters have the same effect on all unshielded materials.
>
>Lastly, assimilation tubules are able to perpetrate just about any defence conceivable. Stormtrooper/clone armor would have no chance of stopping this once the drones adapted to their weapons. Except troopers do have non energy based weapons to attack with even if the blasters are not powerful enough to over whelm the borg shield as seen in Regeneration |
|
First, where is the proof that trek ships are not manuverable enough to dodge turbo lasers.
Second, regardless of how the work they are still ENERGY BASED WEAPONS, and as such can be adapted to by the Borg and there ships.
Lastly, what does that have to do with assimilation tubules once the trooper is grabbed. The tubes will go through their armor like it was tissue paper.
"What i Hate more then anything else is someone that thinks that they know everything. That must mean that I really hate myself", "Freedom is the right of all setient beings!" (Optimus Prime: Transformers), "That's on small step for man, one giant leap for mankind!" Neil Armstrong 8-5-30 to 8-25-12
|
chr33355 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1543 |
Report this
Apr. 16 2012, 5:29 pm
Quote: Camorite @ Apr. 16 2012, 4:51 pm | Quote: chr33355 @ Apr. 15 2012, 5:10 pm | Quote: Camorite @ Apr. 15 2012, 9:24 am | >
>Here are some points I need to comment on. First, from what I have seen the basics of trek an wars tech is relatively the same, they only took different directions with it. Wars went with grandiose overpowered monster ships, counting on smaller ships for defence in battles. while trek goes with a more conservative praticle design that is much more maneuverable. But not nearly manuverable enough to dodge heavy turbolaser fire
>
>Second, in the end there is no difference between blasters an phasers. They are both energy based weapons and therefore WILL BE ADAPTED TOO. I do be live that light sabers, though still energy based weapons, would be effective due to there design and the people that would be using it. Btw, for the person that mentioned obi won not being able to cut through a shield, that is because it was a blast shield which is many many times more powerful then a borg personal shield. There is a difference between blasters and phasers is that blasers are direct energy weapons where as phasers do some kind of exotic chain reaction. This is why phasers have different effects on different materials where as blasters have the same effect on all unshielded materials.
>
>Lastly, assimilation tubules are able to perpetrate just about any defence conceivable. Stormtrooper/clone armor would have no chance of stopping this once the drones adapted to their weapons. Except troopers do have non energy based weapons to attack with even if the blasters are not powerful enough to over whelm the borg shield as seen in Regeneration |
|
First, where is the proof that trek ships are not manuverable enough to dodge turbo lasers. Given what we see ships do on screen in Trek shows is no where near as manuverable as what we see star wars fighters do on screen (And they were still hit by turbolasers)
Second, regardless of how the work they are still ENERGY BASED WEAPONS, and as such can be adapted to by the Borg and there ships. Phasers are easier to adapt to. And we did see in the episode Regeneration to over come the adaptation you just up the firepower. If the minimum firepower of a blaster is higher than the maximum the personal adaptation shield can absorb then it doesn't matter if they adapt.
Lastly, what does that have to do with assimilation tubules once the trooper is grabbed. The tubes will go through their armor like it was tissue paper. The borg can't adapt to kinetic engery based attacks thus will not be able to get close enough to assimulate |

|
chr33355 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1543 |
Report this
Apr. 16 2012, 5:33 pm
Quote: Chidori @ Apr. 16 2012, 1:48 pm | >
>Voyager was the first to successfully combine their tech with borg tech, and was then able to deal damage to 8472. A Borg cube ship could take out a bioship by ramming it, but it would destroy both. The power from linking 9 bioships together (8 in a ring and the 9th to aim and fire) was enough to take out a planet, much like the Death Star. In STO, their name is given as the Undine. It is like the death star in that is destroys plants. However it seems to be some kind of chain reaction given the delay between the beam stopping and the planet exploding.
>Borg do have other ship types though; the cube is just their standard ship. There's a list at http://starchive.cs.umanitoba.ca/?ships/borg/ with what tv episode they were in. Also, as the Borg assimilate (at one point, even Voyager), they can simply add enemy ships to their ranks via assimilation. The cube is also the largest given that a quad medium turbo laser can kill a cube in one shot I don't see the borg being that much of a challenge to the empire.
>It's all just fyi.
>Oh, and chr33355, even if I disagree with what you say, I'll defend your right to say it. A stoic master of defense if ever I met one. I have been doing this debate for a few years now seen all the trekkie arguements and know the counters to all of them.
>
align="center">
> |

|
Kate McCoy GROUP: Members POSTS: 135 |
Report this
Apr. 16 2012, 6:12 pm
Alright Chr33355if you take an X-wing and battle it against any Federation starship and yeah the x-wing is more manuverable than the starfleet ship but it's because of the size take a starfleet shuttle and it's just as manucverable as an X-wing..... And NOTHING can kill the borg in one shot NOTHING....
|
Camorite GROUP: Members POSTS: 5508 |
Report this
Apr. 16 2012, 6:42 pm
Chr33355 did you even watch the ship to ship battle scenes on ds9? Otherwise you would not be saying which things.
Next you are compleatly missing the point on the blaster/phase thing. They are both energy weapons, the Borg ADAPT TO ENERGY WEAPONS, end of story.
Lastly it doesn't matter if they have these weapons or not, eventually they will either get tired or overwhelmed, and thus get assimilated. Heck the klingons use swords and bat'leths, and even they get assimilated.
"What i Hate more then anything else is someone that thinks that they know everything. That must mean that I really hate myself", "Freedom is the right of all setient beings!" (Optimus Prime: Transformers), "That's on small step for man, one giant leap for mankind!" Neil Armstrong 8-5-30 to 8-25-12
|
klingon jedi GROUP: Members POSTS: 67 |
Report this
Apr. 16 2012, 9:39 pm
once the first jedi gets assimilated, they would add his biological and technilogical distinctivness to their own (as they say) imagine a hive mind with knowledge of the force... that's not even fair
|
Chidori GROUP: Members POSTS: 72 |
Report this
Apr. 16 2012, 9:59 pm
Wouldn't it be deliciously wicked if the Borg AND the Empire teamed up to wipe out the Federation and the Rebels? Now in THAT battle, the good guys would have no chance.
One thing I never understood though - the Borg keep sending only one ship to the Federation, it eventually gets destroyed, so they send one more, and so on. If I had their resources and really wanted to wipe someone out, I'd send at least ten. With how the Federation is weakened from the Dominion war and fighting the Klingons too, they could probably do it with ten. Just send one to keep the Enterprise busy or set up a trap or something, and the other nine can wipe out ships and assimilate Earth with little problem.
|
Camorite GROUP: Members POSTS: 5508 |
Report this
Apr. 17 2012, 7:13 am
Quote: klingon jedi @ Apr. 16 2012, 9:39 pm | once the first jedi gets assimilated, they would add his biological and technilogical distinctivness to their own (as they say) imagine a hive mind with knowledge of the force... that's not even fair |
Actually it would be impossible for the Borg to use the force, for several reasons:
First is because of the hive mind. Though Jedi do have the ability to link minds with each other, they are still individuals in the end.
Second and finally the fact that the less organic you are the less you can use the force. This is a documented fact.
"What i Hate more then anything else is someone that thinks that they know everything. That must mean that I really hate myself", "Freedom is the right of all setient beings!" (Optimus Prime: Transformers), "That's on small step for man, one giant leap for mankind!" Neil Armstrong 8-5-30 to 8-25-12
|
tige995 GROUP: Members POSTS: 16 |
Report this
Apr. 17 2012, 11:21 am
Quote: Camorite @ Apr. 17 2012, 7:13 am | Second and finally the fact that the less organic you are the less you can use the force. This is a documented fact. |
It didn't seem to slow Darth Vader.
|
Raven_CWG GROUP: Members POSTS: 17 |
Report this
Apr. 17 2012, 11:55 am
I can’t for the life of me understand why, after all these years, I keep involving myself in these kinds of pointless debates. I guess it’s just my innate distain for ignorance and people who go around parroting half-truths and outright lies that they read somewhere and just automatically assumed were true without ever taking the time to vet the sources of their “information” or question its validity even when all on-screen evidence directly contradicts it. The sheer lack of real facts and supporting evidence in most of these debates never ceases amaze me. And it’s not just a one-sided thing. So many people on both sides of these Star Wars / Star Trek “VS” debates are guilty of this. That said, if I were forced to pick who I believe are the most rabid fans and the most prone to wild exaggerations and claims that their fictional universe is superior in every conceivable way, the prize would have to go to the extreme Warsies. This is not to say that Star Trek fans are faultless—they are certainly guilty at times of arrogance and of making absurd claims about Star Trek tech—but seldom do I see, even from the most radical Trekies, the same level of vitriol hatred and utter distain for Star Wars and its fans that I see frequently displayed by radical Warsies towards Star Trek and its fans. It’s gotten so ridiculous that I’d be willing to bet if you ask most radical Warsies who has the best toothbrush they would swear up and down that Star Wars toothbrushes are so powerful that they would reduce all Star Trek toothbrushes to molten slag. Their arrogance is just nauseating. Most of the time there is no point in even trying to debate anything with them because they are absolutely convinced they’re right about everything and think that you are stupid for even trying to argue with them…and still I try anyway. Don’t get me wrong, I am NOT out to trash Star Wars; in fact, I am a huge Star Wars fan and have been since 1978. I just find it extremely frustrating how such a relatively small number of very vocal radicals, driven by their arrogance and distain for other franchises (particularly Star Trek), have been able to so completely deceive so many Star Wars fans into believing their nonsense.
As I said, there are all kinds of assumptions, fallacies, half-truths and outright lies from both sides that permeate these kinds of debates; and this thread so far is no exception. Already there are far too many problems for me to even want to address them all, so I will instead focus on just one—the absolutely absurd notion that Star Wars turbolasers do hundreds of gigatons worth damage and are therefore several orders of magnitude more powerful than most Star Trek weapons, such as Federation phasers or photon torpedoes.
Without getting into a long-winded discussion over what constitutes Star Wars Canon, the simple, irrefutable fact is that, whether these figures come from officially licensed and printed sources or not, if they do not correspond with what was clearly shown on-screen in the Star Wars movies themselves then they fail as Canon and become little more than fan-wankery. PERIOD! You can try to argue it until you are blue in the face, but there is ABSOLUTELY NO on-screen evidence what-so-ever to support the idea that Star Wars weapons (with the one exception of the Death Star’s main weapon) produce anywhere near that power level. In fact every bit of on-screen evidence would seem to support the exact opposite—that Star Wars turbolasers are no more powerful (and perhaps even less so) then TNG-era Federation phasers. Furthermore, the evidence also suggests that the range and accuracy of most of the Star Wars weapons fall far, far short of that of most Star Trek weaponry. And I am really NOT being biased here; any truly objective analysis of the movies confirms what I am saying. The radical Warsies, however, stubbornly refuse to accept what they see on screen and instead cling to the absurd figures in some EU sources, such as the ICS books, because they simply can not abide any other franchise having any kind of advantage whatsoever over their favorite fictional universe.
|