CloudMinder2 GROUP: Members POSTS: 482 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2012, 7:42 pm
Quote: bvbpl @ Mar. 19 2012, 11:30 am | >
>
class="MsoNormal">I’d like to suggest and alternative theory. There are 101 episodes in TOS / TAS and six films. In contrast, there are 176 episodes of TNG and four movies plus another ~340 DS9 and Voyager episodes. There’s simply more TNG-era stuff than TOS stuff.
> |
I feel obliged to remind you of the saying: 'Less is more' 
"There are always alternatives" Spock
|
Beershark GROUP: Members POSTS: 2582 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2012, 9:30 pm
We are a dying breed. I wacthed TOS with my dad. I watched TNG with my son. My grandson is not into Star trek or even Star Wars.
CORPORATIONS AREN'T PEOPLE! Soylent Green is people.
|
OtakuJo GROUP: Members POSTS: 16232 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2012, 10:16 pm
For a lot of us it all comes down to what we have access to. I saw Star Trek a while back on TV and particularly liked it, and have of course read a lot of other references on it and (with interest) read other people's comments. No doubt my story will be similar to that of other people here:
Having not seen Trek on TV for quite some time, I was most familiar with DS9 because that was the series I bought first on DVD. And after that, Enterprise, and the last few series of TNG. I am still debating whether to get the first few series of TNG (because what I own of those I don't particularly like very much -- at least, not quite enough to justify going out and purchasing the remainder of episodes.) Voyager, I will get when I get around to it. And as for the originals, well -- at the moment there simply aren't any copies for sale in town.
I purchase them slowly for simple pragmatic reasons: Lack of money. And don't have access to internet streaming. No doubt there are others in this "boat", who do like the originals but simply don't own their own copies which they can consult in detail.
I've been asked: Will you ever get around to watching TOS again. Well, yes. It's a simple matter of access and accessibility. And patience.
EDIT:
You might also look at this as a natural consequence of there being more choice. As an earlier poster commented, I believe, there are simply more episodes of other Trek series altogether than there are of TOS. However, I think you'll find that (aside from people watching other series too...) the greatest effect of this is not drawing people away from original Trek, but bringing in fans who would not have otherwise considered checking it out.
Have you ever danced with a Tribble in the pale moonlight?
|
guillermo.mejía GROUP: Members POSTS: 2843 |
Report this
Mar. 22 2012, 12:23 pm
Quote: /view_profile/ @ | Quote: /view_profile/ @ | >
>
>It just looks outdated/faded/blurry...
>It's like when you might have HD TV but when you go someplace else that doesn't have it---it can be the same TV show but it just looks so much older on basic cable or something.
>It just looks "prettier" to watch. If it was the only option, I probably would have watched the reg show, but going from the remaster/HD back to original would be tough b/c the visual quality.
>Doing the remastered versions/etc of any popular show keep it accessible to younger generations.
>I don't know if you're into Blu-Ray, HD, 1080, etc. It was something I didn't really care about it until my brother would make a stink if the DVD I rented wasn't blu-ray, lol -- and I started to see the diff.
>
> |
So being "pretty" is more important than accepting the episodes in their original form as a complete creative work?
|
It is for the general percentege of this generation.
"Aye. And if my grandmother had wheels she'd be a wagon." - Scotty, The Miracle Worker since 2265.
|
Vger23 GROUP: Members POSTS: 6733 |
Report this
Mar. 22 2012, 7:29 pm
Quote: guillermo.mejía @ Mar. 22 2012, 12:23 pm | Quote: /view_profile/ @ | Quote: /view_profile/ @ | >
>
>
>It just looks outdated/faded/blurry...
>It's like when you might have HD TV but when you go someplace else that doesn't have it---it can be the same TV show but it just looks so much older on basic cable or something.
>It just looks "prettier" to watch. If it was the only option, I probably would have watched the reg show, but going from the remaster/HD back to original would be tough b/c the visual quality.
>Doing the remastered versions/etc of any popular show keep it accessible to younger generations.
>I don't know if you're into Blu-Ray, HD, 1080, etc. It was something I didn't really care about it until my brother would make a stink if the DVD I rented wasn't blu-ray, lol -- and I started to see the diff.
>
> |
So being "pretty" is more important than accepting the episodes in their original form as a complete creative work?
|
It is for the general percentege of this generation.
|
Let's not get into generational bias here. I do a ton of work on generational values and motivators as part of my professional work, and believe me, we're all equally weak and shallow in our own little ways.
I AM KEE-ROCK!!
|