ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

What will they do with Klingons in the Reboot Film Series?!?

Mitchz95

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1830

Report this Apr. 14 2012, 8:27 pm

What's wrong with a little healthy speculation? I've heard that anticipation of something is often better than the thing itself when you get it.


"The future is in the hands of those who explore... And from all the beauty they discover while crossing perpetually receding frontiers, they develop for nature and for humankind an infinite love." - Jacques Yves Cousteau

Cpt_krk_wna-b

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 365

Report this Apr. 15 2012, 3:57 pm

Don't know, but I hope they'll look awesome!

codepoet2

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4

Report this Apr. 18 2012, 2:05 pm

I think due to all the stuff from Enterprise, they'll end up having a mix of both... and use uniforms that are a modernized looking version of what was seen in TOS (gold sash somewhere I'd expect).


So that's what I think will happen.


 


I really wish Enterprise had ignored the issue TBH.  I really liked it better when the explanation was the straight-forward: "hey, the TOS show had a tiny budget... they were always supposed to have bumpy forheads."  It was corrected later when we had more to work with.

stovokor2000-A

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2001

Report this Apr. 18 2012, 2:21 pm

Quote:

I really liked it better when the explanation was the straight-forward: "hey, the TOS show had a tiny budget... they were always supposed to have bumpy forheads."  It was corrected later when we had more to work with.


problem being , that so called "straight-forward explanation" wasnt exactly the truth.


Photobucket

codepoet2

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4

Report this Apr. 18 2012, 3:04 pm

Quote: stovokor2000-A @ Apr. 18 2012, 2:21 pm

Quote: /view_profile/ @

>

>I really liked it better when the explanation was the straight-forward: "hey, the TOS show had a tiny budget... they were always supposed to have bumpy forheads."  It was corrected later when we had more to work with.

problem being , that so called "straight-forward explanation" wasnt exactly the truth.


Eh... it's the company line anyway


 


EDIT: Or 'was' I should say...

stovokor2000-A

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2001

Report this Apr. 18 2012, 3:08 pm

that much is true.


Photobucket

Recently logged in

Users browsing this forum: FleetAdmiral_BamBam

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum