wissa GROUP: Members POSTS: 3938  |
Report this
Sep. 23 2012, 7:17 pm
did that really require 3 separate posts? 
|
Invader_Wishfire GROUP: Members POSTS: 27510  |
Report this
Sep. 23 2012, 11:34 pm
darmokattagara: Capitalism is an economic model. It is neither left wing nor right wing. As for fascism and both parties, you are correct.
|
FleetAdmiral_BamBam GROUP: Members POSTS: 44409  |
Report this
Sep. 24 2012, 6:22 am
Quote: wissa @ Sep. 23 2012, 7:17 pm | >
>did that really require 3 separate posts?
> |
I find that it's easier to address multiple points because it often spawns more discussion and it's easier to follow.
|
|
FleetAdmiral_BamBam GROUP: Members POSTS: 44409 |
Report this
Sep. 24 2012, 8:13 am
heheheheh...
Obama finally admits that his campaign has gone "overboard" and made some "mistakes" with his ads during a CBS interview, but CBS omits that portion.... guess they can't admit Obama's not perfect.... |
darmokattanagra GROUP: Members POSTS: 250 |
Report this
Sep. 24 2012, 8:40 am
Quote: Invader_Wishfire @ Sep. 23 2012, 11:34 pm | >darmokattagara: Capitalism is an economic model. It is neither left wing nor right wing. As for fascism and both parties, you are correct. |
There are two different scales. On an economic scale, capitalism is on the right and collectivism is on the left. On a social scale, fascism is on the right and anarchy is on the left. Although most graphs put fascism at the top and anarchy on the bottom like this:
http://politicalcompass.org/uselection2012
Stalin was in the top left, Hitler was in the top right. Fascism is not exclusive to collectivism and freedom is not exclusive to capitalism.
|
|
FleetAdmiral_BamBam GROUP: Members POSTS: 44409 |
Report this
Oct. 12 2012, 10:49 am
So, should all the lamestream propoganda machine's advertising for Obama / against his opponents be part of the DNC budget? |
|
Invader_Wishfire GROUP: Members POSTS: 27510 |
Report this
Oct. 13 2012, 4:06 am
So far, I've seen a grand total of two pro-Obama ads and one pro-Romney ad.
For such a "liberal" media, you'd think they'd play at least as many ads for liberal candidates.
|
DS9_FOREVER! GROUP: Members POSTS: 129 |
Report this
Oct. 13 2012, 12:00 pm
Quote: Invader_Wishfire @ Oct. 13 2012, 4:06 am | >So far, I've seen a grand total of two pro-Obama ads and one pro-Romney ad. For such a "liberal" media, you'd think they'd play at least as many ads for liberal candidates. |
What state? If you are not a "swing state" they don't care.
I just found this great Star Trek MB!!
 |
|
Invader_Wishfire GROUP: Members POSTS: 27510 |
Report this
Oct. 14 2012, 3:18 am
They don't care, period. That's my point. If the media was truly liberal, we'd be seeing ads from candidates from third parties as well. That's a rare thing indeed. So rare that most people don't see such ads.
|
|
FleetAdmiral_BamBam GROUP: Members POSTS: 44409 |
Report this
Oct. 20 2012, 7:50 am
Anyone else catch Chris Matthews latest? Now he's claiming it's unConstitutional to challenge the president..... but of course, that only applies to challenging Obama because it was okay for Matthews to challenge Bush a few years ago.. |
|
FleetAdmiral_BamBam GROUP: Members POSTS: 44409 |
Report this
Oct. 20 2012, 7:54 am
And now MSNBC’s Alex Wagner says that Obama is running for re-election because he has a "higher calling".... but Mitt is only doing it because “it seems like the next thing he should be doing.”
No... no favoritism in the lamestream propoganda machine there.... |
|
darmokattanagra GROUP: Members POSTS: 250 |
Report this
Oct. 20 2012, 12:44 pm
Alright, let's ignore the fact that all media is owned by a handful of conglomerates and that their primary goal is to sell advertising.
Fox is still the most watched network.
The Wall Street Journal is still the most read newspaper.
Talk radio is still dominated by conservatives like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.
By definition, conservative media is the mainstream. |
|
FleetAdmiral_BamBam GROUP: Members POSTS: 44409 |
Report this
Oct. 21 2012, 9:45 am
Quote: darmokattanagra @ Oct. 20 2012, 12:44 pm | >
>Alright, let's ignore the fact that all media is owned by a handful of conglomerates and that their primary goal is to sell advertising.
>Fox is still the most watched network.
>The Wall Street Journal is still the most read newspaper.
>Talk radio is still dominated by conservatives like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.
>By definition, conservative media is the mainstream.
> |
Let's just say that Fox is "conservative" (they're not).... and that the rest of what you say is true...... There are multiple times more media outlets that are ProRegressive than conservative and they, as a whole, have more people watching/reading/listening to them than those you consider conservative.
This is why, if you get "news" from multiple locations, you'll notice pretty much the exact same talking points .... the ones the White House has approved .... getting pushed from all of them.
Take a look at Benghazi.... the lamestream propoganda machine swallowed the lie that it was caused by the YouTube video and was spontaneous (at multiple locations) and was not terrorism hook, line and sinker and kept pushing that point and supporting it. Almost nobody from that side had the guts to question it and as that story has fallen apart, most of them are still supporting the administration lying.
|
|
FleetAdmiral_BamBam GROUP: Members POSTS: 44409 |
Report this
Oct. 21 2012, 9:54 am
See Page 1..... basically anyone the ProRegressives love and believe without any question or thinking. Any outlet that pushes the big government / anti-Constitution agenda.
|
|
Invader_Wishfire GROUP: Members POSTS: 27510 |
Report this
Oct. 21 2012, 10:20 pm
ProRegressive -
"Pro-" In support of.
"Regressive" Pertaining to regression. Politically, reverting to "the way things used to be."
Quick definition of "ProRegressive" Conservative.
|
