Star Trek

Oh, right, because you guys aren't doing the same exact thing with Obama. "Obama... blah blah blah." Yeah, whatever.

"Obamaites." Cute. I suppose it never occured to you that arguing against Romney is not actually arguing for Obama?

Whether or not Bush is in office or running is irrelevant. The point was that Republicans are trying to do to Obama the same exact things that Democrats tried doing to Bush.

Let's see, how about things like universal health care, illegal immigration, the economy. You know, the things that actually matter? But as far as the Democrat/Republican-influenced liberal/conservative (read: corporate) media is concerned, dwelling on minor inconsequential mistakes that are often made out of simple ignorance (read: gaffes) are more important than the things that actually influemce us.

Amen!

Just more proof: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2P4xdg5MSxk  (yea, I know it's old, but still shows how obvious the lamestream media is.)

And then there's always media considering Obama "above the world" and "sort of god"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfsGwfjx7eQ

Another thing to be watchful of is not only what they say, but what they don't say and don't cover...

For example, when that ProRegressive gay rights activist comes in and opens fire with a gun at the Family Research Council, I hardly saw any mention of it by the lamestream propoganda machine, and in the very few stories that was written, none of them that I saw mentioned the gunman's agenda - only that the FRC was listed as a "hate group" by the Southern Law Poverty Center.

Of course, most of us can identify hundreds of similar examples.

What's funny is that even Arthur Brisbane, public editor of the New York Times, had to come clean.  He dedicated his final column to criticizing the paper of liberal bias. According to Brisbane, progressivism “bleeds through” the paper.

Everybody Talking About ' Liberal Media ', When The AP Is Mostly Liars Who Actually Beleive What They Write.Go Figure.

As a few people have tried to point out, the media is corporate. The same ads run in between "news" segments on FOX and MSNBC. The same ads are printed in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. There is no difference in where the money is coming from. Just like with the government. Special interest groups and lobbyists own both political parties. If the media were truly liberal, they would be pushing for candidates like Ralph Nader, not Obama.

That said, you know how if you're at the North Pole you can only go south? If you're on the far-right then everything seems "liberal."

Did I say you were extreme or hateful? Why do you ignore any information that negates your original argument and then act like you're a victim?

I dont believe anything that the media, liberal or conservative, puts out anymore. Come to think of it, I don't like politics at all.

These were handed out at the Democrat Convention.... it was supposed to be a prank, but the lamestream propoganda machine didn't understand it and wanted them (they were free.)

But of course they don't understand that a real media isn't "for" anyone.... just the truth.