Solar Eclipse

Ayko

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 591

Report this Aug. 04 2011, 4:33 pm

You know how when a solar eclipse occurs the moon is at the exact distance from the Earth so it covers the sun at its exact size from our perspective, Is that part of a mathematical science equation or was it a fluke of nature or what?

Chief Warrant Officer
Finn

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 321

Report this Aug. 04 2011, 9:53 pm

Yes.

Ayko

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 591

Report this Aug. 05 2011, 8:07 am

I dont believe it was a fluke of nature, please expand on your informative response,

Chief Warrant Officer
Finn

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 321

Report this Aug. 05 2011, 2:50 pm

It is a matter of chance that can also be explained mathematically.

Ayko

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 591

Report this Aug. 06 2011, 9:33 am

Are you saying that coincidence and fluke chance can be explained mathematically? That would completely change the defintion of those words because it would not be chance,


Would you believe me, or at least consider the possibility, if I told you the moon is artificial and not natural?

lligevets

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 777

Report this Aug. 06 2011, 9:49 am

Quote: Ayko @ Aug. 06 2011, 9:33 am

>

>Are you saying that coincidence and fluke chance can be explained mathematically? That would completely change the defintion of those words because it would not be chance,

>Would you believe me, or at least consider the possibility, if I told you the moon is artificial and not natural?

>



The moon is artificial?

Caesar753

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 578

Report this Aug. 06 2011, 6:48 pm

Quote: Ayko @ Aug. 04 2011, 4:33 pm

>

>You know how when a solar eclipse occurs the moon is at the exact distance from the Earth so it covers the sun at its exact size from our perspective, Is that part of a mathematical science equation or was it a fluke of nature or what?

>


 


Not quite.  There is more than one type solar eclipse depending on several factors.  A total eclipse happens when the moon blocks almost all of the sun, leaving only the corona visible.  An annular eclipse is when the moon doesn't appear to cover the entire sun and leaves a visible 'ring' of sun around the moon.  There are also partial and hybrid eclipses.  There is no mathematical equation at work here, just a pure coincidence of perspective.

Ayko

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 591

Report this Aug. 06 2011, 7:32 pm

I think you are missing my point 753, I am emphasizing the fact that the distance of Earth's Moon from the Earth herself is exactly at the perfect position to block the sun that way, a PERFECT fit to make a corona and/or 'ring of sunlight', as you put it, Seems too coincidental to me, I have another theory,

Ayko

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 591

Report this Aug. 06 2011, 7:39 pm

Quote: lligevets @ Aug. 06 2011, 9:49 am

Quote: Ayko @ Aug. 06 2011, 9:33 am

>

>

>Are you saying that coincidence and fluke chance can be explained mathematically? That would completely change the defintion of those words because it would not be chance,

>Would you believe me, or at least consider the possibility, if I told you the moon is artificial and not natural?

>

The moon is artificial?



I rephrase,

Hypothetically, I am a retired spy, double U-7, your new neighbor, with inside information that leads me to believe that the moon was artificially made and set in Earth's orbit thousands of years ago, Would you seriously consider the possibility or dismiss it instantly? Hypothetically speaking of course,

Chief Warrant Officer
Finn

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 321

Report this Aug. 08 2011, 12:24 am

Quote: Ayko @ Aug. 06 2011, 9:33 am

>

>Are you saying that coincidence and fluke chance can be explained mathematically? That would completely change the defintion of those words because it would not be chance,

>Would you believe me, or at least consider the possibility, if I told you the moon is artificial and not natural?

>
Mathematics, and by extension, physics, deal with probability all the time.  Probability Theory is an entire field of mathematics that covers just probability, randomness, and statistics.  In physics, as you get into the subatomic level, you start to deal with some really weird math.


For example, one of the fundamental properties of particles is that you can only know to a relatively certain degree either the velocity or the location of the particle, but never both.  You have to pick one, and the other you just have to accept its uncertainty.  This is called the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle.


 


Would I believe you that the moon is artificial and not natural?  Well, I'll believe anything if there's enough evidence to support it. 

Ayko

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 591

Report this Aug. 08 2011, 8:41 am

Are there any statistics or estimates as to the number of craters on the Moon?

lligevets

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 777

Report this Aug. 08 2011, 5:48 pm

Quote: Ayko @ Aug. 06 2011, 7:39 pm

Quote: lligevets @ Aug. 06 2011, 9:49 am

Quote: Ayko @ Aug. 06 2011, 9:33 am

>

>

>

>Are you saying that coincidence and fluke chance can be explained mathematically? That would completely change the defintion of those words because it would not be chance,

>Would you believe me, or at least consider the possibility, if I told you the moon is artificial and not natural?

>

The moon is artificial?



I rephrase,

Hypothetically, I am a retired spy, double U-7, your new neighbor, with inside information that leads me to believe that the moon was artificially made and set in Earth's orbit thousands of years ago, Would you seriously consider the possibility or dismiss it instantly? Hypothetically speaking of course,



Hypothetically speaking of course,


 


 I would not believe you and that would lead too. The moon is artificial?


 

Ayko

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 591

Report this Aug. 17 2011, 9:02 am

Quote: Ayko @ Aug. 08 2011, 8:41 am

>

>Are there any statistics or estimates as to the number of craters on the Moon?

>

I ask again...

Chief Warrant Officer
Finn

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 321

Report this Aug. 18 2011, 11:50 am

According to Wikipedia, approximately 300,000 craters of 1 km or larger on the near side alone, perhaps twice as many on the far side.  So close to 1 million craters of 1 km in size.


You could attempt to estimate yourself:


Ayko

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 591

Report this Aug. 28 2011, 5:47 pm

According to science the moon's craters were created by meteorite impacts and if the moon were struck a million times would it still exist?

Recently logged in

Users browsing this forum: Gul PetaQ

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum