Star Trek

The Star Trek 2009 movie was a great movie. I saw it in theaters twice, because it was too confusing the first time I saw it. The graphics in it are super cool. I can't wait to see the next movie this year....

Hate to ruin your day, chief...but they arenot remaking Wrath of Khan. At all. 

Also, I mentioned in another thread once that with Kirk for instance, can have someone with the same build as William Shatner doing the acting. Then his head is replaced with that of William Shatner's as Kirk from stock cells, or individual scenes, from the TOS days. The voice can also be dubbed over with one sounding like his, or parts put together from then. These can be done, with modern filming techniques. But I guess would be too complicated and time consuming. So, just have to get used to the film.

You could I suppose but what actor would want their face and voice (ie -- the key aspects of their acting??) to be covered up with the voice and face of someone else? The CG job they did on Patrick Stewart's face in Wolverine was pretty damn creepy and unnatural. I can see why they opted for real actors, from a practical and artistic standpoint; and totally believe that this was the right decision.

I'm also into Astrology. So, if the film makers also were, can be a case of actors with typical sun signs corresponding well to the main characters. For instance a typical Aries being Kirk, a typical Cancerian being McCoy, and a typical Aquarius being Spock (with a moonsign (what we are on the inside) being a water sign, i.e. Cancer, Scorpio or Pisces). Scotty I'm not sure about, perhaps a Gemini.

Bit of an esoteric interpretation there -- I suppose if you could back it up, you could argue it, although if that were the director / writers' intentions, wouldn't they have said so by now? I like astrology too but I would be more inclined to think of their characters in terms of differing personality types.

I think it was really good. They ending was good, but they should NOT have destroyed Vulcan

I really like the 2009 movie.  I am looking forward to the new movie.

No dawg, they're not remaking TWOK. Abrams has already stated publicly that the Star Trek sequel will NOT be a remake.

Another reason against the remake is that the authors of the original story (Bennett, Sowards, Peeples and Meyer) would be entitled to royalties that Paramount is not willing to pay out.

Going as far as keeping the astrological signs of the characters the same as the actors seems a bit hard. Not even all the Bonds had the same hair color between eachother.