StarTrek.com Administrator GROUP: Moderators POSTS: 139 |
Report this
Apr. 04 2011, 6:54 pm
Quote: /view_profile/ @ | Quote: /view_profile/ @ | >
>
>The tech team is checking a bug that is causing some recent threads to be locked. The issue occurs when a member is blocked from the site and has posted within a thread.
> |
Thanks.
Just reporting what I see. Pages 11-50 of the Enterprise threads are all "(locked)"
|
We'll check those, but there is an auto-lock function set on the boards for inactivity (which could the case on the Enterprise ones).
|
StarTrek.com Administrator GROUP: Moderators POSTS: 139 |
Report this
Apr. 04 2011, 7:19 pm
@ Yanks, two reasons:
(1) It's like an auto-archiving function in which old threads can be used for reference (some fans like going back to their old discussions)
(2) We've had some issues recently with banned members attempting to bump threads to the front just to annoy and inflame members (which it really did).
@ Seer: It's a first for our tech team too!
|
StarTrek.com Administrator GROUP: Moderators POSTS: 139 |
Report this
Apr. 04 2011, 7:32 pm
Quote: /view_profile/ @ | >
>Could be something as simple as a pooched up filter criteria-- that'd be my first thought. Grab a unpaid intern, stuff 'em full of Mounain Dew (or is it Red Bull now?) and Cheetos and let 'em have at it.
>Any chance that we can get a true Archive sub-forum? Or maybe a "Thread Directory" that leaks to the most popular topical and locked threads? Make it easier to reference them in the future?
> |
Can you post this idea in the New Ideas thread? That's what the tech team reviews for new development. Thanks.
|
OtakuJo GROUP: Members POSTS: 16238 |
Report this
Apr. 08 2011, 1:51 am
Quote: FleetAdmiral_BamBam @ Mar. 25 2011, 2:59 pm | >
>Didn't the Admin just put out a policy that any thread that hasn't been updated for x days automatically gets locked?
> |
Have you ever danced with a Tribble in the pale moonlight?
|
Matthias Russell GROUP: Members POSTS: 7705 |
Report this
Apr. 08 2011, 3:26 am
Thanks for the clarification on this, admin.
|
Tureaz'47 GROUP: Members POSTS: 2596 |
Report this
Apr. 09 2011, 7:41 pm
Quote: Roboto @ Apr. 04 2011, 8:56 am | >
>Why do you not simply use a skeleton key?
>
> |
Excellent! 
It's strange, being a catalyst for things that move outside.
|
BrotherofShran01 GROUP: Members POSTS: 23343 |
Report this
Apr. 10 2011, 7:02 pm
A lot of things has been talked about more than once. It's time for a new series so we have new stuff to post about.
|
FleetAdmiral_BamBam GROUP: Members POSTS: 44409 |
Report this
Apr. 10 2011, 7:57 pm
Quote: BrotherofShran01 @ Apr. 10 2011, 7:02 pm | >
>A lot of things has been talked about more than once. It's time for a new series so we have new stuff to post about.
> |
|
NCC1701K.1 GROUP: Members POSTS: 72 |
Report this
Jun. 04 2011, 6:21 pm
i think i commented on a locked thread and or entered it and read it. i dunno. i do alot of navagating.
|
lligevets GROUP: Members POSTS: 777 |
Report this
Jun. 05 2011, 6:30 am
Quote: /view_profile/ @ | >
>Maybe Administration should start locking the never ending End of Days and some of the Obama bashing/bait threads.
>Just saying.
>It's not as if they are worthwhile or contribute anything positive to the 10F subforum.
>
> |
That’s funny especially since you post in those same threads feeding into the discussion.
|
Matthias Russell GROUP: Members POSTS: 7705 |
Report this
Jun. 06 2011, 12:02 pm
Well where are the updates? They stated an update thread and commented once. It would be nice to know what's going on with the site so we know it isn't being abandoned.
|
|
lucia.marcu GROUP: Members POSTS: 18 |
Report this
Jun. 28 2011, 8:13 am
it's not abandoned, they are working on improving it
i am who i should be
|