ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

Super Carrier design

johnd777

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1029

Report this Nov. 17 2010, 8:17 pm

Using "spare parts" from other sci fi shows:


 



.

miklamar

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2154

Report this Nov. 17 2010, 9:10 pm

Cool, but you say this is a carrier? Where do the aircraft go--in the rear?

Var Miklama--Zakdorn, engineer. "A sound mind in a FULL body!" "Time, like latinum, is a limited quantity in the galaxy."

Matthias Russell

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 7705

Report this Nov. 18 2010, 4:31 am

Galactica plus jupiter 2 makes a horrible federation ship. In addition, you replaced the flight decks with nacelles, so it's not a carrier. "thou shalt not pass."

2takesfrakes

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3683

Report this Nov. 18 2010, 6:56 am

Who says johnd777 doesn't
have a sense of humor ... ?


chr33355

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1551

Report this Nov. 18 2010, 12:53 pm

No way Fighters go against the communal philosophy of the Federation.

Roboto

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3883

Report this Nov. 18 2010, 1:18 pm

Intriguing design... not sure I understand how it could work as a carrier, but it is quite imaginative. My father worked on an aircraft carrier when he was in the navy; I am sure he would get a kick out of this.


johnd777

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1029

Report this Nov. 18 2010, 8:22 pm

 



It's a Babylon 5 / Battlestar galactica hybrid. The "flight deck" for (space craft) fighters... including Defiant size ships... is through the lower (secondary hull) in multiple directions fore and aft just so long as is clears the lower "bubble" on the saucer section. This ship is so big that engineering is IN the nacelles and supports... struts...


.

johnd777

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1029

Report this Nov. 18 2010, 8:28 pm

Right click on image (view image) dor larger image.


.

johnd777

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1029

Report this Nov. 18 2010, 8:52 pm

Here's a schematic of sizes and ships...


 


right click "view image" to see larger...


.

Invader_Wishfire

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 27518

Report this Nov. 19 2010, 12:15 am

Quote: chr33355 @ Nov. 18 2010, 12:53 pm

>No way Fighters go against the communal philosophy of the Federation.


That line doesn't even make sense. Regardless, they had them.


 photo spok_zps253ab564.gif

johnd777

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1029

Report this Nov. 19 2010, 4:00 pm

Nay sayers' only recourse...


 



.

johnd777

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1029

Report this Nov. 19 2010, 4:03 pm

This is what made TOS so hard to get onb air and keep on air...


.

2takesfrakes

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3683

Report this Nov. 21 2010, 4:43 am

That's right johnd777! Only
you have the proper vision.
You're the only one of us who
is able to see around corners.

Jason222

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 715

Report this Nov. 21 2010, 7:00 am

Quote: chr33355 @ Nov. 18 2010, 12:53 pm

>No way Fighters go against the communal philosophy of the Federation.


UFP used attack fighters thoughtout Domimion war. So UFP use fighters when they think going face heavy losing anyway.


As for UFP super carrier way UFP wast time design and building new class starship when alreadly have super class carry it call Galaxy class starship. Galaxy class starship at least 3 seperation shuttlebays and maybe more.

johnd777

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1029

Report this Nov. 27 2010, 12:43 pm


.

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum