ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

The President Obama appreciation thread

FleetAdmiral_BamBam

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 46303

Report this Oct. 18 2012, 8:57 am

Yep - according to the Department of Treasury, in FY2012, for every $7 the government brought in, he spent $11.....


But of course Obama says he needs four more years... that way, for every $7 the government brings in, he'll spend $111....  (Although if the MESSiah continues to destroy businesses, the tax revenue will be zero by 2016.)

FleetAdmiral_BamBam

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 46303

Report this Oct. 22 2012, 9:10 am

Received one of those "Who are you going to vote for" survey calls this morning....


But as anyone who's ever had statistics knows, survey question are often phrased in such a way to get the outcome they want....


 


So after pointing this out and asking what their agenda was..... it finally came out.....  they were the Socialist Party of America trying to get people to vote for Obama.

darmokattanagra

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 386

Report this Oct. 22 2012, 10:19 am

Quote: FleetAdmiral_BamBam @ Oct. 22 2012, 9:10 am

>

>So after pointing this out and asking what their agenda was..... it finally came out.....  they were the Socialist Party of America trying to get people to vote for Obama.

>


I find that hard to believe considering the Socialist Party already has a candidate:


http://stewartalexanderforpresident2012.org/

FleetAdmiral_BamBam

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 46303

Report this Oct. 22 2012, 10:38 am

Quote: darmokattanagra @ Oct. 22 2012, 10:19 am

Quote: FleetAdmiral_BamBam @ Oct. 22 2012, 9:10 am

>

>

>So after pointing this out and asking what their agenda was..... it finally came out.....  they were the Socialist Party of America trying to get people to vote for Obama.

>

I find that hard to believe considering the Socialist Party already has a candidate:

http://stewartalexanderforpresident2012.org/

I'm well aware that they have their own official candidates, but they also have other candidates from other parties that agree with their platform.... from the DNC to the RNC to the Green Party, etc.


I think that it's like many libertarians who are pushing Romney over Johnson.... because the race is so close, they'd just don't want the "other" candidate.


The other reason is that the official socialist party candidate is not on every state's ballot, so it's possible that they called me based on my cell phone number (which is from a state I previously lived) and not where I currently live.


 


The bottom line is... take a look at who's coming out to support Obama.... the official Communist Party of the USA endorsed him.... Hugo Chavez..... etc.  Basically anyone who hates the US Constitution and the freedoms it protects.  There's a reason they support Obama, and it's very obvious.


 


Although it's very obvious with Obama, even if someone didn't know him and what he stood for.... they could tell a lot based on his friends/supporters and his opponents.


FleetAdmiral_BamBam

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 46303

Report this Oct. 24 2012, 10:16 am

Ooops..... now Obama's lies about Benghazi are starting to really unravel...


 


Remember when Obama lied about the reason our embassies were attacked on 9/11 and we all knew it was a lie then... and then the White House continued telling the same lie over and over again?


Now we have e-mails proving that the White House knew within two hours that it was a terrorist attack and that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit.


 


And some people want to re-elect someone that lies to them?  Talk about insane.

entropyman

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 127

Report this Oct. 24 2012, 6:14 pm

My question is when are the Democrats/liberals going to launch Obama? I mean if Obama's presidency is sinking, are the libs going to go down with him, or will they distance themselves from him in order to save liberalism?

FleetAdmiral_BamBam

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 46303

Report this Oct. 24 2012, 9:18 pm

Quote: entropyman @ Oct. 24 2012, 6:14 pm

>

>My question is when are the Democrats/liberals going to launch Obama? I mean if Obama's presidency is sinking, are the libs going to go down with him, or will they distance themselves from him in order to save liberalism?

>
The MESSiah is their savior.... well, according to them....  Some even pray to him.....


Come on.... they still hold Clinton in very high esteem and he perjured himself.....


 


Hmmmm... there seems to be a pattern there..... the ProRegressives like people who are dishonest and hate integrity....


 


Sidenote:  Historically, the word "Liberal" were for those people that supported liberty (notice the same root word?)  Early last century, those that wanted to move towards a larger government and less individual freedoms were called Progressives, but they got such a bad name, they started calling themselves liberals.  Sadly, they still have the same agenda - destroy the US Constitution.


Invader_Wishfire

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 27518

Report this Oct. 26 2012, 3:41 am

"My question is when are the Democrats/liberals..."

And that is where your question falls short. Democrats are not liberal. Not by a long shot. That's why actual liberals oppose Obama. Of course, it's hard to tell with the conservative media...

 photo spok_zps253ab564.gif

darmokattanagra

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 386

Report this Oct. 26 2012, 9:04 am

Quote: FleetAdmiral_BamBam @ Oct. 24 2012, 9:18 pm

>

>Sidenote:  Historically, the word "Liberal" were for those people that supported liberty (notice the same root word?)  Early last century, those that wanted to move towards a larger government and less individual freedoms were called Progressives, but they got such a bad name, they started calling themselves liberals.  Sadly, they still have the same agenda - destroy the US Constitution.

>


The left are called "liberals" because they have more liberal positions on issues regarding individual liberty like gay marriage and abortion. The only liberty the right seems to care about is economic liberty.


Also, it was the Constitution that created the powerful central government that you despise. It was the Constitution that gave Congress the power to tax (redistribute) and make laws (regulate). It was the Federalist Papers that helped ratify the Constitution. If you want to blame someone for "big government" then blame your beloved Founders.

FleetAdmiral_BamBam

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 46303

Report this Oct. 26 2012, 9:22 am

Quote: darmokattanagra @ Oct. 26 2012, 9:04 am

Quote: FleetAdmiral_BamBam @ Oct. 24 2012, 9:18 pm

>

>

>Sidenote:  Historically, the word "Liberal" were for those people that supported liberty (notice the same root word?)  Early last century, those that wanted to move towards a larger government and less individual freedoms were called Progressives, but they got such a bad name, they started calling themselves liberals.  Sadly, they still have the same agenda - destroy the US Constitution.

>

The left are called "liberals" because they have more liberal positions on issues regarding individual liberty like gay marriage and abortion. The only liberty the right seems to care about is economic liberty.

Also, it was the Constitution that created the powerful central government that you despise. It was the Constitution that gave Congress the power to tax (redistribute) and make laws (regulate). It was the Federalist Papers that helped ratify the Constitution. If you want to blame someone for "big government" then blame your beloved Founders.

Wow... you really haven't actually read history, have you?  You just spout a little bit and completely out of context.  I highly suggest that you actually read the words of our founding fathers - they're available online and can be downloaded for free - you just invest some time to study.  Read their personal letters, their public proclamations, their debates, etc.


The US Constititon was written to ensure individual liberty and keep the federal government small - that's why Obama complains that the Constitution doesn't give him enough power.  If you actually read the Constitution and the Constitutional debate and the Federalist & Anti-Federalist Papers, you'd know that the Constitution was designed to keep the federal government extremely limited.


Taxation is NOT about redistribution of wealth - it's supposed to be about funding Constitutional government.  Take a look at the enumerated powers (Article I, Section 8) - that's the only govermental powers they legally have.  Only those that support tyranny support redistribution via government.


The word "regulation" has been perverted over the last 200 years.  When it was written in the Constitution, it meant to make commerce regular (look it up in the dictionary of the time,) not to crush or control it.  The goal was to open up commerce between the states because the states were actually inhibiting trade.


Most of the Founding Fathers hated big government.... they knew the dangers and that's why they fought a revolution to separate from Britain.


 


 


But none of what you wrote suprises me.... I see too many "man on the street" interviews and the vast majority of people haven't a clue about our roots and can't answer the simplest of questions.


VulcanKat

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 715

Report this Oct. 26 2012, 4:20 pm

Why do people label there beliefs? Left or right or middle. What that does is create clicks where you have to believe in a set of principles in order to be considered part of that click. Therefore, you don't form your own opinions based on objective analysis so much. That's why we have these rediculous "liberals" vs. "conservative" fights. 

FleetAdmiral_BamBam

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 46303

Report this Oct. 26 2012, 4:36 pm

Quote: VulcanKat @ Oct. 26 2012, 4:20 pm

>

>Why do people label there beliefs? Left or right or middle. What that does is create clicks where you have to believe in a set of principles in order to be considered part of that click. Therefore, you don't form your own opinions based on objective analysis so much. That's why we have these rediculous "liberals" vs. "conservative" fights. 

>
Because labels are supposed to explain something - they're supposed to have meaning.  When someone says they're a Constitutionalist, that's supposed to mean something the opposite of a communist/socialist... or labeling someone based on the citizenship (American vs. X.)  When someone says that they're married, that's a label that's supposed to mean something.


But, yes, labels can be used to separate people - especially when a label is a misnomer or when a person doesn't quite fit 100% of the rest of the group (but who does?)


darmokattanagra

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 386

Report this Oct. 26 2012, 10:16 pm

Quote: FleetAdmiral_BamBam @ Oct. 26 2012, 9:22 am

Quote: darmokattanagra @ Oct. 26 2012, 9:04 am

Quote: FleetAdmiral_BamBam @ Oct. 24 2012, 9:18 pm

>

>

>

>Sidenote:  Historically, the word "Liberal" were for those people that supported liberty (notice the same root word?)  Early last century, those that wanted to move towards a larger government and less individual freedoms were called Progressives, but they got such a bad name, they started calling themselves liberals.  Sadly, they still have the same agenda - destroy the US Constitution.

>

The left are called "liberals" because they have more liberal positions on issues regarding individual liberty like gay marriage and abortion. The only liberty the right seems to care about is economic liberty.

Also, it was the Constitution that created the powerful central government that you despise. It was the Constitution that gave Congress the power to tax (redistribute) and make laws (regulate). It was the Federalist Papers that helped ratify the Constitution. If you want to blame someone for "big government" then blame your beloved Founders.

Wow... you really haven't actually read history, have you?  You just spout a little bit and completely out of context.  I highly suggest that you actually read the words of our founding fathers - they're available online and can be downloaded for free - you just invest some time to study.  Read their personal letters, their public proclamations, their debates, etc.

The US Constititon was written to ensure individual liberty and keep the federal government small - that's why Obama complains that the Constitution doesn't give him enough power.  If you actually read the Constitution and the Constitutional debate and the Federalist & Anti-Federalist Papers, you'd know that the Constitution was designed to keep the federal government extremely limited.

Taxation is NOT about redistribution of wealth - it's supposed to be about funding Constitutional government.  Take a look at the enumerated powers (Article I, Section 8) - that's the only govermental powers they legally have.  Only those that support tyranny support redistribution via government.

The word "regulation" has been perverted over the last 200 years.  When it was written in the Constitution, it meant to make commerce regular (look it up in the dictionary of the time,) not to crush or control it.  The goal was to open up commerce between the states because the states were actually inhibiting trade.

Most of the Founding Fathers hated big government.... they knew the dangers and that's why they fought a revolution to separate from Britain.

 

 

But none of what you wrote suprises me.... I see too many "man on the street" interviews and the vast majority of people haven't a clue about our roots and can't answer the simplest of questions.


The main purpose of the Constitution was to replace the weak federal government created by the Articles of Confederation. It wasn't until after the Constitution went into effect that the Bill of Rights was included. Even then, the Constitution did nothing to end slavery and only male landowners of a certain race had the right to vote or hold office. You're right that the Founders wanted to keep government small but only in the sense that they wanted to keep power consolidated within a very small percentage of the population. It's been over 200 years and not much has changed in that respect.

Regarding taxes, under the General Welfare Clause, the Constitution gave Congress the power to use tax money to do three things: pay debts, provide for the common defense and provide for the general welfare. Some Federalists like Madison felt that "general welfare" was to be interpreted narrowly while others like Hamilton felt that it should be interpreted more broadly. Hamilton's view prevailed during the administrations of Washington and Adams but from 1800 to 1936, Madison's view prevailed. In 1936, the Supreme Court ruled that the power to tax and spend was an independent power and that the General Welfare Clause gives Congress power it might not derive anywhere else. In 1937, the Supreme Court ruled that Social Security was constitutionaly permissible as an exercise of the federal power to spend for the general welfare. Furthermore, it conferred upon Congress a plenary power to impose taxes and to spend money for the general welfare subject almost entirely to Congress's own discretion.

As far as regulations go, I was refering to the fact that Congress holds legislative power.


law, noun


-the principles and regulations established in a community by some authority and applicable to its people, whether in the form of legislation or of custom and policies recognized and enforced by judicial decision.


regulation, noun


-a law, rule, or other order prescribed by authority, especially to regulate conduct.

darmokattanagra

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 386

Report this Oct. 26 2012, 10:22 pm

Quote: FleetAdmiral_BamBam @ Oct. 26 2012, 4:36 pm

Quote: VulcanKat @ Oct. 26 2012, 4:20 pm

>

>

>Why do people label there beliefs? Left or right or middle. What that does is create clicks where you have to believe in a set of principles in order to be considered part of that click. Therefore, you don't form your own opinions based on objective analysis so much. That's why we have these rediculous "liberals" vs. "conservative" fights. 

>
Because labels are supposed to explain something - they're supposed to have meaning.  When someone says they're a Constitutionalist, that's supposed to mean something the opposite of a communist/socialist... or labeling someone based on the citizenship (American vs. X.)  When someone says that they're married, that's a label that's supposed to mean something.

But, yes, labels can be used to separate people - especially when a label is a misnomer or when a person doesn't quite fit 100% of the rest of the group (but who does?)


It's funny you say that labels are supposed to mean something considering you use them so inaccurately.

maihem

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 5

Report this Oct. 26 2012, 11:16 pm

Yeah spend ur way out of debt that works really well and obama care is just socialism. Take obamacare health or pay a fine that sounds like freedom. And who pays for this, you do, the tax payer with higher and higher insurance preiums this includes your car insurance, insurance for your house medical insurance thru your employer eventaully driving preiums so high it will put many out of business and your job along with it. Oh yeah where are all the jobs Obama has created???? Yeah the gov has all the answers for a people who want to be taken care of and led around like cattle to a slaughter house. Wake up before we wake in a socialist state.

Post Reply

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum