Star Trek

Report this May. 26 2010, 8:16 pm

They sure did need more consensus on the state of Earth's colonies going into ENT--I feel like the writers were largely lazy and simply didn't do their homework. Yeh, what ABOUT Alpha Centauri and Cochran? I always thought that meant there was already a colony there, of a sort.

Ah...I sorta agree with your critic this time around! A mixed bag, yes.

• Back to Top

Report this May. 26 2010, 8:32 pm

Sorry, had to do that ....  

• Back to Top

Report this May. 26 2010, 8:37 pm

Quote (grigori @ May 26 2010, 8:16 pm)

They sure did need more consensus on the state of Earth's colonies going into ENT--I feel like the writers were largely lazy and simply didn't do their homework. Yeh, what ABOUT Alpha Centauri and Cochran? I always thought that meant there was already a colony there, of a sort. Ah...I sorta agree with your critic this time around! A mixed bag, yes.

Agreed. Not one of my favorite episodes and the writers should have done their homework.

• Back to Top

Report this May. 26 2010, 8:46 pm

• Back to Top

Report this May. 26 2010, 9:16 pm

• Back to Top

Report this May. 26 2010, 9:25 pm

• Back to Top

Report this May. 27 2010, 8:38 pm

• Back to Top

Report this May. 27 2010, 10:06 pm

tx Yx!

I'm still puzzled why the episode just didn't appeal to so many--the concept could have been intriguing, a look at an early Earth colony.

Maybe it was just too depressing to see where the colonists ended up, crawling around underground & self-declared enemies of their own kind. And naive & child-like about their situation.

• Back to Top

Report this May. 27 2010, 11:05 pm

I give this a 5. Looking back, this episode wasn't all that interesting to me. This is basically a skipper for me.

• Back to Top

Report this May. 28 2010, 12:06 am

• Back to Top