DammitJim6200 GROUP: Members POSTS: 6876  |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 5:27 pm
Bigfoot known as Sasquach is know to inhabit the North West of the U.S, a family of Bigfoot was seen in the Nevada mountains, does he exist ? I'm hoping to find out
WHO BELIEVES in him or seen him ? seriously ?
|
joxerlives GROUP: Members POSTS: 671 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 5:34 pm
I would like to. But vast though the Pacific Northwest is you have to wonder why we haven't got a body or some remains etc yet.
|
|
DammitJim6200 GROUP: Members POSTS: 6876 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 5:46 pm
| Quote (joxerlives @ Mar. 18 2010, 6:34 pm) | | I would like to. But vast though the Pacific Northwest is you have to wonder why we haven't got a body or some remains etc yet. |
Dense woods, they probably bury their dead, they're very intelligent you know. |
BashirBonesBeverly GROUP: Members POSTS: 2003 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 5:47 pm
| Quote (DammitJim6200 @ Mar. 19 2010, 5:46 pm) | | Quote (joxerlives @ Mar. 18 2010, 6:34 pm) | | I would like to. But vast though the Pacific Northwest is you have to wonder why we haven't got a body or some remains etc yet. |
Dense woods, they probably bury their dead, they're very intelligent you know. |
how can we know they are intelligent if one has never been captured and studied. you assume too much. |
Trekwolf164 GROUP: Members POSTS: 32043  |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 5:52 pm
 He was a good guest star on 'The Six Million Dollar Man" |
|
DammitJim6200 GROUP: Members POSTS: 6876 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 6:03 pm
| Quote (BashirBonesBeverly @ Mar. 18 2010, 6:47 pm) | | Quote (DammitJim6200 @ Mar. 19 2010, 5:46 pm) | | Quote (joxerlives @ Mar. 18 2010, 6:34 pm) | | I would like to. But vast though the Pacific Northwest is you have to wonder why we haven't got a body or some remains etc yet. |
Dense woods, they probably bury their dead, they're very intelligent you know. |
how can we know they are intelligent if one has never been captured and studied. ¿you assume too much. |
Well if one was NEVER captured that goes to show how intelligent they are, realized that there are vast amounts of wooded area in the North west and in or near the Canadian border, we don't know what the hell is in those woods. |
Cruervo GROUP: Members POSTS: 5659 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 6:32 pm
I dont find it extremely hard to think of a North American primate.
|
stovokor2000 GROUP: Members POSTS: 2683 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 6:33 pm
| Quote (joxerlives @ Mar. 19 2010, 5:34 pm) | | I would like to. But vast though the Pacific Northwest is you have to wonder why we haven't got a body or some remains etc yet. |
No bodies have ever been found of dead bears in the wild either....[aside from those that were shot on the spot, nature has a way of reclaiming its waste. |
grigori GROUP: Members POSTS: 10463 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 9:00 pm
That one documentary was sort of provocative--where they set the trap with the nails in the board and got what they thought were blood/hair samples of the resident Bigfoot. And DNA-wise it tested just one or two, I don't recall, DNA markers from human, like 99.9%, but no known human had shown that much deviation. Chimps, the next most human-like, were way farther off than that.
|
|
Cruervo GROUP: Members POSTS: 5659 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 9:02 pm
| Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:00 pm) | | That one documentary was sort of provocative--where they set the trap with the nails in the board and got what they thought were blood/hair samples of the resident Bigfoot. And DNA-wise it tested just one or two, I don't recall, DNA markers from human, like 99.9%, but no known human had shown that much deviation. Chimps, the next most human-like, were way farther off than that. |
I've always wondered, was there a chimp genome project too? Of course, "scientists" have been asserting that chimps were 96% similar to humans since before the human genome project was even conceived. |
|
grigori GROUP: Members POSTS: 10463 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 9:24 pm
| Quote (Cruervo @ Mar. 19 2010, 9:02 pm) | | Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:00 pm) | | That one documentary was sort of provocative--where they set the trap with the nails in the board and got what they thought were blood/hair samples of the resident Bigfoot. And DNA-wise it tested just one or two, I don't recall, DNA markers from human, like 99.9%, but no known human had shown that much deviation. Chimps, the next most human-like, were way farther off than that. |
I've always wondered, was there a chimp genome project too? Of course, "scientists" have been asserting that chimps were 96% similar to humans since before the human genome project was even conceived. |
Good point. We know such a small fraction of what's to be known. And the Bigfeet could just be the extremely anti-social humans among us--or not among us, as the case may be. So they would be reasonably intelligent. |
|
Cruervo GROUP: Members POSTS: 5659 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 9:25 pm
| Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:24 pm) | | Quote (Cruervo @ Mar. 19 2010, 9:02 pm) | | Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:00 pm) | | That one documentary was sort of provocative--where they set the trap with the nails in the board and got what they thought were blood/hair samples of the resident Bigfoot. And DNA-wise it tested just one or two, I don't recall, DNA markers from human, like 99.9%, but no known human had shown that much deviation. Chimps, the next most human-like, were way farther off than that. |
I've always wondered, was there a chimp genome project too? Of course, "scientists" have been asserting that chimps were 96% similar to humans since before the human genome project was even conceived. |
Good point. We know such a small fraction of what's to be known. And the Bigfeet could just be the extremely anti-social humans among us--or not among us, as the case may be. So they would be reasonably intelligent. |
I like the idea of a group of large anti-social humans. |
|
grigori GROUP: Members POSTS: 10463 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 9:29 pm
| Quote (Cruervo @ Mar. 19 2010, 9:25 pm) | | Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:24 pm) | | Quote (Cruervo @ Mar. 19 2010, 9:02 pm) | | Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:00 pm) | | That one documentary was sort of provocative--where they set the trap with the nails in the board and got what they thought were blood/hair samples of the resident Bigfoot. And DNA-wise it tested just one or two, I don't recall, DNA markers from human, like 99.9%, but no known human had shown that much deviation. Chimps, the next most human-like, were way farther off than that. |
I've always wondered, was there a chimp genome project too? Of course, "scientists" have been asserting that chimps were 96% similar to humans since before the human genome project was even conceived. |
Good point. We know such a small fraction of what's to be known. And the Bigfeet could just be the extremely anti-social humans among us--or not among us, as the case may be. So they would be reasonably intelligent. |
I like the idea of a group of large anti-social humans. |
And the hairiness could be the 2-3 gene markers. But they're never said to be spotted in groups...A couple of "pair" spottings I think, and that one wild story about someone "kidnapped" and witnessing a Bigfoot family. I just sit around and half-watch these documentaries sometimes and bits of stories soak in. But Bigfoot is one of those phenomenon that has sprung up independently all around the world, and since very long times ago. |
|
DammitJim6200 GROUP: Members POSTS: 6876 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 9:40 pm
| Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:29 pm) | | Quote (Cruervo @ Mar. 19 2010, 9:25 pm) | | Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:24 pm) | | Quote (Cruervo @ Mar. 19 2010, 9:02 pm) | | Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:00 pm) | | That one documentary was sort of provocative--where they set the trap with the nails in the board and got what they thought were blood/hair samples of the resident Bigfoot. And DNA-wise it tested just one or two, I don't recall, DNA markers from human, like 99.9%, but no known human had shown that much deviation. Chimps, the next most human-like, were way farther off than that. |
I've always wondered, was there a chimp genome project too? Of course, "scientists" have been asserting that chimps were 96% similar to humans since before the human genome project was even conceived. |
Good point. We know such a small fraction of what's to be known. And the Bigfeet could just be the extremely anti-social humans among us--or not among us, as the case may be. So they would be reasonably intelligent. |
I like the idea of a group of large anti-social humans. |
And the hairiness could be the 2-3 gene markers. But they're never said to be spotted in groups...A couple of "pair" spottings I think, and that one wild story about someone "kidnapped" and witnessing a Bigfoot family.
I just sit around and half-watch these documentaries sometimes and bits of stories soak in.
But Bigfoot is one of those phenomenon that has sprung up independently all around the world, and since very long times ago. |
I've seen that documentary too, the explorers said those hair samples from the nail, definitely weren't from no bear or man in an ape suit, and don't forget that Patterson film from 1967.. till this day no one can prove that to be a fake. |
|
stovokor2000 GROUP: Members POSTS: 2683 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 10:33 pm
| Quote (DammitJim6200 @ Mar. 19 2010, 9:40 pm) | | Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:29 pm) | | Quote (Cruervo @ Mar. 19 2010, 9:25 pm) | | Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:24 pm) | | Quote (Cruervo @ Mar. 19 2010, 9:02 pm) | | Quote (grigori @ Mar. 18 2010, 10:00 pm) | | That one documentary was sort of provocative--where they set the trap with the nails in the board and got what they thought were blood/hair samples of the resident Bigfoot. And DNA-wise it tested just one or two, I don't recall, DNA markers from human, like 99.9%, but no known human had shown that much deviation. Chimps, the next most human-like, were way farther off than that. |
I've always wondered, was there a chimp genome project too? Of course, "scientists" have been asserting that chimps were 96% similar to humans since before the human genome project was even conceived. |
Good point. We know such a small fraction of what's to be known. And the Bigfeet could just be the extremely anti-social humans among us--or not among us, as the case may be. So they would be reasonably intelligent. |
I like the idea of a group of large anti-social humans. |
And the hairiness could be the 2-3 gene markers. But they're never said to be spotted in groups...A couple of "pair" spottings I think, and that one wild story about someone "kidnapped" and witnessing a Bigfoot family.
I just sit around and half-watch these documentaries sometimes and bits of stories soak in.
But Bigfoot is one of those phenomenon that has sprung up independently all around the world, and since very long times ago. |
I've seen that documentary too, the explorers said those hair samples from the nail, definitely weren't from no bear or man in an ape suit,
and don't forget that Patterson film from 1967..
till this day no one can prove that to be a fake. |
Except Patterson himself. Near his death he started telling conflicting stories about that film. Some reports have him recanting the story as as hoax while others say he held to his original story till his death. I dont think we can rely on that film all that much. |
