EnterpriseSovereign GROUP: Members POSTS: 37683 |
Report this
Mar. 18 2010, 3:04 pm
Yes, I do. I imagine it's got 4 (or 6) warp nacelles in the same configuration as the Prometheus, and a large phaser cannon like the one the Ent-D had in "All good things" 
|
EnterpriseSovereign GROUP: Members POSTS: 37683 |
Report this
Mar. 18 2010, 3:08 pm
|
EnterpriseSovereign GROUP: Members POSTS: 37683 |
Report this
Mar. 18 2010, 3:11 pm
Found this which I'm not convinced of:  Clearly the equivalent of a Nebula class ship.
|
Enterprise19 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1543 |
Report this
Mar. 18 2010, 3:37 pm
And here's G: 
|
Enterprise19 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1543 |
Report this
Mar. 18 2010, 4:16 pm
| Quote (GHOSTREK @ Mar. 18 2010, 3:57 pm) | | Quote (starbase63 @ Mar. 17 2010, 5:43 pm) | F looks like a pregnant guppy...
That G you can tell they're working toward the design of the J.
 |
yes kit bashing needs to stop |
What does bashing mean again?
|
tribblenator999 GROUP: Members POSTS: 3818 |
Report this
Mar. 18 2010, 7:43 pm
I don't know what it would look like but it would be fugly because 24th century ship designers make ugly looking ships except for the prometheus, intrepid and sovereign classes.
|
Unregistered_Guest GROUP: Members POSTS: 857 |
Report this
Mar. 18 2010, 8:07 pm
If you have the new TNG 4 movie set, check out the disc Star Trek Evolutions. It shows the F and it looks nothing like the pics posted so far.
|
vulcan7 GROUP: Members POSTS: 5696 |
Report this
Mar. 18 2010, 10:38 pm
gee the F looks like the E.
|
BrotherofShran01 GROUP: Members POSTS: 23343 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 6:43 am
| Quote (EnterpriseSovereign @ Mar. 18 2010, 3:11 pm) | Found this which I'm not convinced of:

Clearly the equivalent of a Nebula class ship. |
Here is the site that has more info on the pic you found on the Enterprise - F. Enterprise - F
|
EnterpriseSovereign GROUP: Members POSTS: 37683 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 7:52 pm
Pity they're working towards such an ugly duckling in the J. I wonder what the Z would look like  I reckon it would be around in the 29th or 31st century.
|
AngelOfShadows GROUP: Members POSTS: 20500 |
Report this
Mar. 19 2010, 8:02 pm
| Quote (Enterprise19 @ Mar. 18 2010, 4:16 pm) | | Quote (GHOSTREK @ Mar. 18 2010, 3:57 pm) | | Quote (starbase63 @ Mar. 17 2010, 5:43 pm) | F looks like a pregnant guppy...
That G you can tell they're working toward the design of the J.
 |
yes kit bashing needs to stop |
What does bashing mean again? |
He means "kitbashing". Kitbashing is when you take too ship classes and merge them into one.
|
|
GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Mar. 20 2010, 2:37 am
| Quote (Enterprise19 @ Mar. 18 2010, 3:37 pm) | And here's G:
 |
Where's this one from?
|
Holberg GROUP: Members POSTS: 1046 |
Report this
Mar. 20 2010, 9:27 am
If some of these keep on their going to look like something from NASA. Just a old style rocket Me, I like the old girl from TOS. Now that's a ship Man, I love that ship ¿  ¿ 
|
Pooneil GROUP: Members POSTS: 929 |
Report this
Mar. 20 2010, 6:00 pm
Those pics of the alleged Enterprise-F look like someone stepped on the Enterprise-E.
Why stop at four or six warp nacelles? Why not ten? How about a dozen "super-phasers" like the "All Good Things" ship had?
I like the original ship. Clean lines, smooth surface, classic shape. Future starship engineers should take a look at it, instead of adding more spoilers and go-faster stripes.
|
Holberg GROUP: Members POSTS: 1046 |
Report this
Mar. 20 2010, 10:51 pm
| Quote (Pooneil @ Mar. 20 2010, 6:00 pm) | Those pics of the alleged Enterprise-F look like someone stepped on the Enterprise-E.
Why stop at four or six warp nacelles? Why not ten? How about a dozen "super-phasers" like the "All Good Things" ship had?
I like the original ship. Clean lines, smooth surface, classic shape. Future starship engineers should take a look at it, instead of adding more spoilers and go-faster stripes. |

|