ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

Star Wars vs Star Trek

EzrianBashirax

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 581

Report this Feb. 10 2010, 10:56 pm

What ship? :laugh:

lostshaker

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2293

Report this Feb. 10 2010, 11:07 pm

Thanks for the link. That was great!!

lostshaker

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2293

Report this Feb. 10 2010, 11:08 pm

Quote (EzrianBashirax @ Feb. 10 2010, 10:56 pm)
What ship? :laugh:

Watch and find out.

Mirrorgirl

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 15692

Report this Feb. 11 2010, 12:37 am

Cool, enjoyed this a lot! :laugh:

Kdbtrekkin

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3648

Report this Feb. 11 2010, 6:05 pm

:cool:

captbates

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 12614

Report this Feb. 11 2010, 6:12 pm

Marshall, I love how that video will annoy the hell out of "certain" posters, but man, you've got waaaay too much spare time, lol.

:laugh: :laugh:

tribblenator999

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3818

Report this Feb. 13 2010, 10:32 am

krenim owns the star wars universe. :D

Lucifer_

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 12834

Report this Feb. 13 2010, 10:44 am

LOL...I love how Marshall continually erases comments from YouTube viewers who offer rebuttals to his video and text comments, silencing any criticism. Best of all, I love how Marshall's "Per1on" dual simply concedes every point, a phantom cheerleader to try and make himself look better. It doesn't, it makes Marshall look like a desperate fool.

I've already flagged this video for removal, @$$hole.

Lucifer_

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 12834

Report this Feb. 14 2010, 9:45 am

Quote (marshall8472 @ Feb. 13 2010, 7:57 pm)
Quote (Lucifer_ @ Feb. 13 2010, 10:44 am)
LOL...I love how Marshall continually erases comments from YouTube viewers who offer rebuttals to his video and text comments, silencing any criticism. Best of all, I love how Marshall's "Per1on" dual simply concedes every point, a phantom cheerleader to try and make himself look better. It doesn't, it makes Marshall look like a desperate fool.

I've already flagged this video for removal, @$$hole.

I enjoy a good rebuttal, just not one from him. ?He's rude and he doesn't deserve to have a voice on my own channel for it ?:p

Style over Substance Fallacy. (clicky)

I'd like for the forum to take note of the irony at work here; that someone who likes to refer to others as "child" and "boy" has just displayed such a juvenile mindset. ¿See, mature adults have the capacity to separate the message from the messenger while children do exactly what Marshall has done...cried "WAH!!! HE'S MEAN!!!!" and stuck his proverbial fingers in his proverbial ears.

Marshall, if your arguments held water and if the Krenim are so invincible, then it would not even be necessary to delete comments that are contrary to your position.

BrotherofShran01

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 23344

Report this Feb. 14 2010, 10:40 am

Star Trek rules!!!

chr3335

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 7914

Report this Feb. 14 2010, 4:36 pm

Quote
Assuming that's a credible canon source, that type of relativistic shielding would not protect them from changes in the past.  Relativistic shielding does not protect against attacks or energies except the types of energies generated in hyperspace travel.  Voyager's level 9 temporal shields protected them from temporal weapons like the krenim torpedos.  
 Sigh if it was a weak argument why bother to delete it?

bobbu

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2

Report this Feb. 14 2010, 5:12 pm

this makes a time paradox, if you use something form outside of time to affect timeline based events, you negate the reason to use the weapon in the first place, and in the end the thing is still there cause they shot it. there for making the weapon useless from the beginning.

Lucifer_

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 12834

Report this Feb. 15 2010, 2:34 am

Quote (marshall8472 @ Feb. 14 2010, 10:39 am)
The only one I called a child was you because you acted like one when I first saw you talk...

I'm not the only one you've taken this condescending tone with.

Quote
and has yet to redeem himself


Redeem myself? Pi$$ off you frakking wanker. Pardon me for a moment while I recover from violent fits of laughter.

Quote
...and is "not all there" as he says on other forums, I don't even want to know) from the status of child.


Stalking, I see. And my previous comment above was merely in jest...

Quote
Even if we play along and say some how, some way star wars has shields based on temporal science and let's say maybe 50 ships have these shields up by pure chance after the krenim weapon erases everything else and the 50 ships survive the temporal shockwave with their "temporal shielding". ?They still have no offensive attack against the krenim weapon.


Voyager came up with offensive weapons based on their temporal shields tech, why wouldn't the denizens of the SW universe be capable of doing the same? Because you say so?

chr3335

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 7914

Report this Feb. 15 2010, 7:42 am

Like I said if they were weak arguments why did you delete them?  And no not every post has to be approved you are in a probationary period.

chr3335

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 7914

Report this Feb. 15 2010, 9:23 am

Quote (marshall8472 @ Feb. 14 2010, 10:19 am)
Quote (chr3335 @ Feb. 15 2010, 7:42 am)
Like I said if they were weak arguments why did you delete them? ?And no not every post has to be approved you are in a probationary period.

cus I don't like the guy. I addressed all his arguments here though. I consider it fair for the record I was arguing with him on a star trek vs star wars video where the owner threatened to ban me if I bought up the possibility of using other aliens of star trek to fight against star wars.

Here's what I said

Quote
And I could do the same using some of the really strange things in Star Wars Marsh. This conversation is over. If you persist in this attempted derailment I will ban you from this topic.


it's my video my rules. ¿It's my channel and my rules just like he can ban me from pro-star wars videos I can ban anyone from pro-star trek videos.

Sounds like more was going on than you admit.  Seeing as you ban anyone who you disagree with from your video comments this doesn't surprise me.

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum