ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

USS Defiant vs The Millenium Falcon

Ali88

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 889

Report this Jan. 23 2010, 7:26 pm

Which would win in a battle






Or



sonofspock1

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6457

Report this Jan. 23 2010, 7:49 pm

There has been an awful lot of "Us Vs. Them" polls recently.

A tough fight, but I reckon the Defiant would come out on tops.

I wonder do they have these polss on starwars.com? :laugh:

BrotherofShran01

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 23344

Report this Jan. 23 2010, 8:02 pm

The Defiant. No question about it. even though I like the Millennium Falcon, she was a freighter, not a warship.

TheDriver

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1652

Report this Jan. 23 2010, 10:34 pm

I LOVE Han Solo and the Millennium Falcon.

But this really is no contest. The Defiant wins with ease.

Josh_Lyman

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 5520

Report this Jan. 24 2010, 7:10 am

Quote (Ali88 @ Jan. 22 2010, 8:26 pm)
Which would win in a battle






Or




I'm not that sure that either ship exists in reality.

chr3335

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 7914

Report this Jan. 24 2010, 10:18 am

This would be an amazing fight.

The Defiant has a size advantage and possibly an armor advantage (hard to tell as the Falcon has military grade armor plating as well).

Fire power goes to the Falcon due to it missiles, and the Falcon has a huge maneuverability and sub light speed advantage.

FTL speed is moot as neither ship has ever been seen to fight at FTL, but the Falcon has a huge advantage in this as hyperdrive is far faster than any warp capable ship we have seen.

I honestly don't know who would win this fight with a vanilla crew (and by vanilla i mean both ships have a crew of average human ability) and the battle would be even more epic with both ships normal crew.  If the falcon hits with its missiles first it is over.  Pulse phasers are a lot weaker than SW fighter cannons but should still be able to do some damage.

I go with the Falcon even if the Defiant cloaks the Falcon should be able to track it based on the drive emissions and launch a concussion missile into it.

chr3335

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 7914

Report this Jan. 24 2010, 10:19 am

Quote (sonofspock1 @ Jan. 22 2010, 8:49 pm)
There has been an awful lot of "Us Vs. Them" polls recently.

A tough fight, but I reckon the Defiant would come out on tops.

I wonder do they have these polss on starwars.com? :laugh:

No over the the debate is pretty much over as all the evidences says Wars would Crush Trek  ;)  :p

sonofspock1

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6457

Report this Jan. 24 2010, 10:59 am

Quote (chr3335 @ Jan. 24 2010, 3:19 pm)
Quote (sonofspock1 @ Jan. 22 2010, 8:49 pm)
There has been an awful lot of "Us Vs. Them" polls recently.

A tough fight, but I reckon the Defiant would come out on tops.

I wonder do they have these polss on starwars.com? :laugh:

No over the the debate is pretty much over as all the evidences says Wars would Crush Trek ¿;) ¿:p

Someone should infiltrate starwars.com, and ask the same poll!

Come to think of it, would they even know what the Defiant is? :laugh:

sonofspock1

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6457

Report this Jan. 24 2010, 11:06 am

Quote (Shuttle @ Jan. 24 2010, 10:08 am)
Quote (marshall8472 @ Jan. 23 2010, 5:22 am)
At first glance it's an intriguing match-up since they both kinda have the same shape. ?But the Defiant looks better even by appearance.

Millennium Falcon Dimensions: Length 34.75 meters; Width 25.61 meters; Height/Depth 8.27 meters (including woer cannon and upper sensor array)

USS Defiant Dimensions: Length, 170.68 meters; beam, 134.11 meters; height: 30.1 meters

If size matters, the defiant's got the advantage there. ? ?The first USS Defiant Dimensions have a Ablative armor which allow it to withstand direct hits even with no shields. ?The Millennium Falcon can take hits too. ?The Defiant has a cloaking device and is faster. ?The Defiant can go a maximum of Warp 9.982 for 12 hours which is way faster than the Millenium Falcon. ?The Defiant is a warship built originally to fight and defeat the borg. ?It can fire fast and accurate. ?I see no advantages for the Falcon.

Whilst I agree, I also know that some Warsie will soon be along to tell everyone why the Falcon is superior due it's hyperdrive, turbolasers and blah blah blah. These threads always go the same way.

Anyway - Dr Who pwns all.

:laugh:

I'd have to agree. The TARDIS has become my all time favourite space vehicle. :cool:

tribblenator999

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3818

Report this Jan. 24 2010, 11:14 am

first off dr who is off the subject since they're more ground based than space based.

Star Wars stats are way over rated and inflated because they make no sense whatsoever.

third defiant trounces the millenium falcon because it looks a lot meaner. :)

captbates

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 12614

Report this Jan. 24 2010, 11:24 am

Quote (sonofspock1 @ Jan. 23 2010, 3:59 pm)
Quote (chr3335 @ Jan. 24 2010, 3:19 pm)
Quote (sonofspock1 @ Jan. 22 2010, 8:49 pm)
There has been an awful lot of "Us Vs. Them" polls recently.

A tough fight, but I reckon the Defiant would come out on tops.

I wonder do they have these polss on starwars.com? :laugh:

No over the the debate is pretty much over as all the evidences says Wars would Crush Trek ?;) ?:p

Someone should infiltrate starwars.com, and ask the same poll!

Come to think of it, would they even know what the Defiant is? :laugh:

I have a funny feeling that words like "Vanilla" just prove that these kind of topics are ALL that happens on the Warsie boards. ¿:laugh:

sonofspock1

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6457

Report this Jan. 24 2010, 11:35 am

Quote (captbates @ Jan. 24 2010, 4:24 pm)
Quote (sonofspock1 @ Jan. 23 2010, 3:59 pm)
Quote (chr3335 @ Jan. 24 2010, 3:19 pm)
Quote (sonofspock1 @ Jan. 22 2010, 8:49 pm)
There has been an awful lot of "Us Vs. Them" polls recently.

A tough fight, but I reckon the Defiant would come out on tops.

I wonder do they have these polss on starwars.com? :laugh:

No over the the debate is pretty much over as all the evidences says Wars would Crush Trek ?;) ?:p

Someone should infiltrate starwars.com, and ask the same poll!

Come to think of it, would they even know what the Defiant is? :laugh:

I have a funny feeling that words like "Vanilla" just prove that these kind of topics are ALL that happens on the Warsie boards. ?:laugh:

Good point! :laugh:

LtCmdrHanson

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2606

Report this Jan. 25 2010, 12:27 am

Defiant for the win!

chr3335

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 7914

Report this Jan. 25 2010, 9:12 am

Quote (marshall8472 @ Jan. 24 2010, 4:01 am)
Quote (chr3335 @ Jan. 24 2010, 10:19 am)
Quote (sonofspock1 @ Jan. 22 2010, 8:49 pm)
There has been an awful lot of "Us Vs. Them" polls recently.

A tough fight, but I reckon the Defiant would come out on tops.

I wonder do they have these polss on starwars.com? :laugh:

No over the the debate is pretty much over as all the evidences says Wars would Crush Trek ?;) ?:p

ehh you wish,

http://st-v-sw.net/STSWcompare.html shows reasons why Star Trek has plenty of advantages over Star Wars.

The fact this site has a question mark over ground combat and FTL travel means it is obviously pro trekkie since trek has a ground combat force that the modern military could wipe the floor with.  As for FLT it would have taken Voyager 70 years to get back to earth from 70,000 light years were as Wars vessels routinely make a trip like that in a matter of hours days at the most.  

Oh trek has superior power generation haha that is funny given we have seen what the death star can do an in order to do it the power generation far exceeds anything the federation has period.  And the federation has better armor :laugh:  :laugh: that great only one class of trek ship is ever seen with armor where as all star wars ships are heavily armored (he must be basing this on the famous scene where an asteroid hits a star destroyers bridge the least armored portion of the ship).  And trek has a longer combat range even though all combat in trek occurs on screen in less than 5 km from each other.

I am familar with this guys website he is a rabid trekkie that just can't accept defeat.  

the debate is over trekkie get crushed

chr3335

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 7914

Report this Jan. 25 2010, 10:47 am

Quote (marshall8472 @ Jan. 24 2010, 11:04 am)
Quote
As for FLT it would have taken Voyager 70 years to get back to earth from 70,000 light years were as Wars vessels routinely make a trip like that in a matter of hours days at the most. ¿


When hans is asked about the speed of his ship he says 0.5 past light speed or 1.5 times the speed of light. ¿Ships on star trek are capable of going several thousand times the speed of light.

If a ship on star wars is capable of going across a galaxy in hours that doesn't really say much since galaxy size can range from 300 light years to 300,000 light years.

Quote
I am familar with this guys website he is a rabid trekkie that just can't accept defeat. ¿

the debate is over trekkie get crushed


showing an essay from a star wars site (imagin that) doesn't carry much wait with me heh.

Quote
If a ship on star wars is capable of going across a galaxy in hours that doesn't really say much since galaxy size can range from 300 light years to 300,000 light years.
 Offical records state the SW galaxy is far larger than the milkyway about 120,000 light years.

Quote
showing an essay from a star wars site (imagin that) doesn't carry much wait with me heh.
But a table from the site of a star trek guy does haha.

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum