dryson GROUP: Members POSTS: 749 
Report this
Dec. 29 2009, 3:54 pm
I have discovered/developed a new way to map out space time in a faster and more convient method.
The method is called Quantatative Representative Mathematics.
It begins with a subset of numbers and math functions that i am currently still discovering or developing.
I will begin with the QRM1 subset.
1/1=2, 1/3=4, 1/4=5, 1/6=7 ect. The number on the left side of right hand function escalation sign is the object an apple or space to be divided that can be divided. On the right hand side of the right hand esclalation sign is the diviser or the object doing the dividing such as a razor or geometrical constrained dimension that cannot be divided by the object divided.
The QRM1 subset is the easiest of the QRM subsets with each result being able to be proven by using the same variables involved with the original subset such as in QRM1 1/2 = 4. To find the proof of the result you can multiply 1 x 1 = 1 (2) = 2 then double the two to get 4. Both of which are a dualed value based on the original object and diviser of the porblem. You can also simply double the diviser by two.

captbates GROUP: Members POSTS: 12614 
Report this
Dec. 29 2009, 5:22 pm

4_of_20 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1052 
Report this
Dec. 30 2009, 12:55 pm
Dryson, great to have you back. How was prison?

lanceromega GROUP: Members POSTS: 3859 
Report this
Dec. 30 2009, 2:38 pm
Quote (dryson @ Dec. 28 2009, 4:54 pm)  I have discovered/developed a new way to map out space time in a faster and more convient method.
The method is called Quantatative Representative Mathematics.
It begins with a subset of numbers and math functions that i am currently still discovering or developing.
I will begin with the QRM1 subset.
1/1=2, 1/3=4, 1/4=5, 1/6=7 ect. The number on the left side of right hand function escalation sign is the object an apple or space to be divided that can be divided. On the right hand side of the right hand esclalation sign is the diviser or the object doing the dividing such as a razor or geometrical constrained dimension that cannot be divided by the object divided.
The QRM1 subset is the easiest of the QRM subsets with each result being able to be proven by using the same variables involved with the original subset such as in QRM1 1/2 = 4. To find the proof of the result you can multiply 1 x 1 = 1 (2) = 2 then double the two to get 4. Both of which are a dualed value based on the original object and diviser of the porblem. You can also simply double the diviser by two. 
glad to see that you stealing ideas from mathematicians from the universities in China, in Proffessor Guojun Wang paper on Quantitative logic, he state the exact same equations for dealing with pseudo metrics, also the same methods are used in Covering Plane with Tiles... So we are adding Plagiarism,to your list of crimes!!! You should not rip off ideas from Mathematics journals, was that the only reading material you had available in prison? ? ? Hope your stay in the big house got you all that loving you were missing Â¿

dryson GROUP: Members POSTS: 749 
Report this
Dec. 30 2009, 5:02 pm
Your mentality is still that of a little child and no I did not steal anything from anyone, I have never even heard of the guy that you are talking about and it is not pseudo metrics as you call them it is a real mathematical way of precisely plotting a certain area of space.
Jail is for minor offenses like fighting or someone being accused of an over exaggeration to make a political point.
Prison is for rapists, murder's conartists, repeat drug traffickers's terrorists ect.
Now back to the formula.
The next formula or the left hand rule clearly states that when you have more than one object on the left hand side of the escalation sign and more than one diviser on the right hand side of the escalation sign you can always multiply the object divided by the diviser then double the result to get the intial subset result. For example I will use the QRM  7 subset.
7(1"x1")\1n1=14 this means that on the intial gridding of an area of space such as Â¿notebook paper or grid paper if you you align seven squares in a linear fashion to each other when you make your intial dimension you will have 14 equal rectangles. To make the rectangle and actual grid of a squared value you will need to add the second subset value of 7(1"x1")\1n2=14 to the equation for the gridded result of
7(1"x1")\1n1=14 or 14 exactly dimensioned rectangles in the vertical plane of space time referance. 7(1"x1")\1n2=14 or 14 exactly dimensioned rectangles in the horizontal plane of space time referance.
We then add both subsets together:
Â¿7(1"x1")\1n1=14 rectangles +7(1"x1")\1n2=14 rectangle squares ____ 14 (1/4"x1/4")=28 or 14 equal squares on each side of the medium and a total of 28 exactly squared grids total for the number of original objects divided by the diviser that then forms an area of perfect dimension in which to measure an area of space with.
Just because the name of a popular scientist isn't attached to a math formula, if the formula uses at least two out of the four math functions and the result is proven true and correct then the problem is not pseudo but a real function to solve a problem. Not everyone has to define theirself with someone elses logic that is called personality programming. No one e ever learns anything of value by being personally programmed to think like someone else.

4_of_20 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1052 
Report this
Dec. 31 2009, 2:58 am
your equation sucks, like you in prison

lanceromega GROUP: Members POSTS: 3859 
Report this
Dec. 31 2009, 2:12 pm
Quote (dryson @ Dec. 29 2009, 6:02 pm)  Your mentality is still that of a little child and no I did not steal anything from anyone, I have never even heard of the guy that you are talking about and it is not pseudo metrics as you call them it is a real mathematical way of precisely plotting a certain area of space.
Jail is for minor offenses like fighting or someone being accused of an over exaggeration to make a political point.
Prison is for rapists, murder's conartists, repeat drug traffickers's terrorists ect.
Now back to the formula.
The next formula or the left hand rule clearly states that when you have more than one object on the left hand side of the escalation sign and more than one diviser on the right hand side of the escalation sign you can always multiply the object divided by the diviser then double the result to get the intial subset result. For example I will use the QRM  7 subset.
7(1"x1")\1n1=14 this means that on the intial gridding of an area of space such as ?notebook paper or grid paper if you you align seven squares in a linear fashion to each other when you make your intial dimension you will have 14 equal rectangles. To make the rectangle and actual grid of a squared value you will need to add the second subset value of 7(1"x1")\1n2=14 to the equation for the gridded result of
7(1"x1")\1n1=14 or 14 exactly dimensioned rectangles in the vertical plane of space time referance. 7(1"x1")\1n2=14 or 14 exactly dimensioned rectangles in the horizontal plane of space time referance.
We then add both subsets together:
?7(1"x1")\1n1=14 rectangles +7(1"x1")\1n2=14 rectangle squares ____ 14 (1/4"x1/4")=28 or 14 equal squares on each side of the medium and a total of 28 exactly squared grids total for the number of original objects divided by the diviser that then forms an area of perfect dimension in which to measure an area of space with.
Just because the name of a popular scientist isn't attached to a math formula, if the formula uses at least two out of the four math functions and the result is proven true and correct then the problem is not pseudo but a real function to solve a problem. Not everyone has to define theirself with someone elses logic that is called personality programming. No one e ever learns anything of value by being personally programmed to think like someone else. 
Wow once again you show us that you donot have any understanding of written material. My criticism that the equations you using are stolen from preexist papers on tile geometry !!!! Not that you are wrong! How are you going to have us believe that you could come up with any mathematical equations since so many of your posting in the past show your total lack of the simplest mathematical understanding, and so many of your own past arguments attack mathematical formulas as poor description of physical reality... ? In this case I state that a well know name, Professor Guojun Wang, wrote a paper on Quantitative logic that uses the same form of equations to analysis tile positioning of geometric surfaces, which also involve Dr Penrose who first pioneer the mathematics of this field. In your case prison is the perfect place, since you are a con artist.. Jail generally is for those awaiting processing for booking, it usually at a precinct house or central booking location, once process a person is sent to prison to await trial if they cannot make bail or when finally convinced.. Apparently you must have spent a few day at jail before being sent to an mental asylum for observation.... That would explain you being out to haunt us with you innate postings... anyone interested in tile geometry can look at the following website: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/junkyard/tiling.htmlit cover the basics of the subject, which is very interesting topic, some of the design and shape that come about are beautiful to look at..

4_of_20 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1052 
Report this
Dec. 31 2009, 5:36 pm
Dryson a plagiarist? Well I never...
Does this mean that the Dryson equation, which relates to how many millidrysons of energy I want in my warp field, is also ripped off?

4_of_20 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1052 
Report this
Jan. 02 2010, 7:35 pm

4_of_20 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1052 
Report this
Jan. 02 2010, 7:36 pm

4_of_20 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1052 
Report this
Jan. 02 2010, 7:36 pm

4_of_20 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1052 
Report this
Jan. 02 2010, 7:38 pm

4_of_20 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1052 
Report this
Jan. 02 2010, 7:38 pm

4_of_20 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1052 
Report this
Jan. 02 2010, 7:39 pm

4_of_20 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1052 
Report this
Jan. 02 2010, 7:40 pm
