ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

24th Cebtury Ship designs in the Aternate Universe

SaturnsRings

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 0

Report this Nov. 07 2009, 12:49 pm

These are a couple of designs I found on Trek BBS of what the future Star Ship Enterprise may look like in the new Alternate Universe's 24th century.

The bottom ship is the Enterprise E, and I am not sure what the top ship is. It looks more like the C, and Ambassador Class design.

I think they look great. I love the new Enterprise from the movie anyway. So if you hate that design you might hate these also.

Ali88

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 889

Report this Nov. 07 2009, 1:10 pm

I think the top one is much better looking and I don't hate the look of it although the warp engines themselves look a little too long


But I'm getting really fed up with people comparing the stuff in JJ abram's star trek to the original star trek universe saying things like " JJ Abram's star trek is way bigger, more colourful, more powerful and more updated than the ships in the prime timeline"

It's just stupid


So is this the future for JJ Abram's star trek? Just reboot TNG and make the enterprise D and E much bigger and more wonderful than the one in the prime timeline?

Is this what all fans really want? is this the direction you want star trek to go?

Instead of going forward and exploring what hasn't been explored before, let's just go back and reboot what doesn't need to be rebooted aka TOS, TNG, Khan, V'Ger etc


I don't know about anyone else but I think the term "To boldly go where no one has gone before" has absolute no meaning whatsoever in Jar Jar abram's star trek

SaturnsRings

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 0

Report this Nov. 07 2009, 1:15 pm

Quote (Ali88 @ Nov. 07 2009, 1:10 pm)
I'm getting really fed up with people comparing the stuff like starships in JJ abram's star trek to the original star trek universe saying things like "oh yeah JJ Abram's star trek is way bigger, more colourful and more updated than the prime timeline, screw all that c**p"

It's stupid

So is this the future for JJ Abram's star trek? Just reboot TNG and make the enterprise D and E much bigger and more wonderful than the one in the prime timeline?

Is this what all fans really want? is this the direction you want star trek to go?

Instead of going forward and exploring what hasn't been explored before, let's just go back and reboot what doesn't need to be rebooted aka TOS, TNG etc


I don't know about anyone else but I think the term "To boldly go where no one has gone before" has absolute no meaning whatsoever in Jar Jar abram's star trek

I see it quite differently. I love Star Trek and I loved the new movie. Therefore for those who did love the new movie we are naturally curious to know how will our other much loved Star Trek series like TNG, VOY & DS9 look and be like in this new alternate universe?

It is fun to speculate about that and with many creative and artistic fans in Star Trek I really appreciate their attempts to satisfy that curiosity.

Ali88

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 889

Report this Nov. 07 2009, 1:29 pm

Quote (SaturnsRings @ Nov. 07 2009, 1:15 pm)
Quote (Ali88 @ Nov. 07 2009, 1:10 pm)
I'm getting really fed up with people comparing the stuff like starships in JJ abram's star trek to the original star trek universe saying things like "oh yeah JJ Abram's star trek is way bigger, more colourful and more updated than the prime timeline, screw all that c**p"

It's stupid

So is this the future for JJ Abram's star trek? Just reboot TNG and make the enterprise D and E much bigger and more wonderful than the one in the prime timeline?

Is this what all fans really want? is this the direction you want star trek to go?

Instead of going forward and exploring what hasn't been explored before, let's just go back and reboot what doesn't need to be rebooted aka TOS, TNG etc


I don't know about anyone else but I think the term "To boldly go where no one has gone before" has absolute no meaning whatsoever in Jar Jar abram's star trek

I see it quite differently. I love Star Trek and I loved the new movie. Therefore for those who did love the new movie we are naturally curious to know how will our other much loved Star Trek series like TNG, VOY & DS9 look and be like in this new alternate universe?

It is fun to speculate about that and with many creative and artistic fans in Star Trek I really appreciate their attempts to satisfy that curiosity.

ok fair enough

But couldn't we change the look of the enterprise in TOS and TNG, if we wanted to

Also, notice how people say the touchscreen consoles in TOS and TNG look outdated already but we can digitally change the consoles and change the look of them so they'll never become outdated, no matter how much time has passed

Admiral_BlackCat

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1048

Report this Nov. 08 2009, 1:32 pm

Very cool. Nice find SR!

Narada

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4008

Report this Nov. 10 2009, 1:40 pm

Yes good find SaturnRings! I very much appreciate your contributions and you make many great threads. These designs from trekbbs are very cool!

Captain_Storma

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 11836

Report this Nov. 11 2009, 2:35 pm

Quote (Ali88 @ Nov. 07 2009, 10:10 pm)
I think the top one is much better looking and I don't hate the look of it although the warp engines themselves look a little too long


But I'm getting really fed up with people comparing the stuff in JJ abram's star trek to the original star trek universe saying things like " JJ Abram's star trek is way bigger, more colourful, more powerful and more updated than the ships in the prime timeline"

It's just stupid


So is this the future for JJ Abram's star trek? Just reboot TNG and make the enterprise D and E much bigger and more wonderful than the one in the prime timeline?

Is this what all fans really want? is this the direction you want star trek to go?

Instead of going forward and exploring what hasn't been explored before, let's just go back and reboot what doesn't need to be rebooted aka TOS, TNG, Khan, V'Ger etc


I don't know about anyone else but I think the term "To boldly go where no one has gone before" has absolute no meaning whatsoever in Jar Jar abram's star trek

I made my peace with the TOS reboot... but there is no need to reboot the other shows.

I don't want to see other actors pretending to be the crews of TNG, DS9 or ENT.

Instead of rebooting those shows, they should focus on "new worlds", and new ideas.

Stick with TOS for the big screen (seems to be successful).
But please... create something new for TV.

Narada

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4008

Report this Nov. 11 2009, 2:47 pm

I also feel this way Captain Storma. I also like that you made peace with the new movie however you feel about it. This shows much for your character. I do not feel they need to reboot the Next Generation or any Star Trek show. I would also like to see a new show with a new ship and a new crew. If they wish to make easter eggs and mention a character name that we know this is fine but I do not feel the tv shows must be re imagined. If this does happen I will not be against it but it is not my preference.

Narada

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4008

Report this Nov. 11 2009, 3:36 pm

The top one is my favorite. It is true the Enterprise E designs look like a traditional design which was squashed flat. Rocketscientist also points out they are stretched along an axis. I saw there were more pictures someone from this site created which shows more of the traditional ships as they will appear if designed in this style. I cannot remember who made them but they were very good!

Captain_Storma

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 11836

Report this Nov. 11 2009, 5:10 pm

Quote (Narada @ Nov. 11 2009, 11:47 pm)
I also feel this way Captain Storma. I also like that you made peace with the new movie however you feel about it. This shows much for your character. I do not feel they need to reboot the Next Generation or any Star Trek show. I would also like to see a new show with a new ship and a new crew. If they wish to make easter eggs and mention a character name that we know this is fine but I do not feel the tv shows must be re imagined. If this does happen I will not be against it but it is not my preference.

They should complete this movie trilogy IMO, gain some new fans and then move on...

I just hope (for the sake of all TREK), that they will NOT one day recast TOS once more, and we will go in circles forever.

Yeah, it worked this time... they should use that, but after that, they should really work out something new. It will get boring with Kirk number 3, 4, 5, 6.... n. ;)

rocketscientist

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 10054

Report this Nov. 11 2009, 7:18 pm

Quote (Captain_Storma @ Nov. 11 2009, 5:10 pm)
Quote (Narada @ Nov. 11 2009, 11:47 pm)
I also feel this way Captain Storma. I also like that you made peace with the new movie however you feel about it. This shows much for your character. I do not feel they need to reboot the Next Generation or any Star Trek show. I would also like to see a new show with a new ship and a new crew. If they wish to make easter eggs and mention a character name that we know this is fine but I do not feel the tv shows must be re imagined. If this does happen I will not be against it but it is not my preference.

They should complete this movie trilogy IMO, gain some new fans and then move on...

I just hope (for the sake of all TREK), that they will NOT one day recast TOS once more, and we will go in circles forever.

Yeah, it worked this time... they should use that, but after that, they should really work out something new. It will get boring with Kirk number 3, 4, 5, 6.... n. ;)

Or, they could just not do anymore ST period.  

I'd be fine with that too.

SaturnsRings

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 0

Report this Nov. 11 2009, 7:28 pm

Quote (Narada @ Nov. 11 2009, 3:36 pm)
The top picture is my favorite. It is true the Enterprise E designs look like a traditional design which was squashed flat. Rocketscientist also points out they are stretched along an axis. I saw there were more pictures someone from this site created which shows more of the traditional ships as they will appear if designed in this style. I cannot remember who made them but they were very good!

The top picture is is really one of my favorite designs ever. It reminds me of the Ambassador class to a certain degree.

Narada

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4008

Report this Nov. 12 2009, 12:32 am

Quote (Captain_Storma @ Nov. 11 2009, 5:10 pm)
Quote (Narada @ Nov. 11 2009, 11:47 pm)
I also feel this way Captain Storma. I also like that you made peace with the new movie however you feel about it. This shows much for your character. I do not feel they need to reboot the Next Generation or any Star Trek show. I would also like to see a new show with a new ship and a new crew. If they wish to make easter eggs and mention a character name that we know this is fine but I do not feel the tv shows must be re imagined. If this does happen I will not be against it but it is not my preference.

They should complete this movie trilogy IMO, gain some new fans and then move on...

I just hope (for the sake of all TREK), that they will NOT one day recast TOS once more, and we will go in circles forever.

Yeah, it worked this time... they should use that, but after that, they should really work out something new. It will get boring with Kirk number 3, 4, 5, 6.... n. ;)

:logical:  :logical:  :cool:  :cool:

Captain_Storma

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 11836

Report this Nov. 12 2009, 8:04 am

Quote (rocketscientist @ Nov. 12 2009, 4:18 am)
Quote (Captain_Storma @ Nov. 11 2009, 5:10 pm)
Quote (Narada @ Nov. 11 2009, 11:47 pm)
I also feel this way Captain Storma. I also like that you made peace with the new movie however you feel about it. This shows much for your character. I do not feel they need to reboot the Next Generation or any Star Trek show. I would also like to see a new show with a new ship and a new crew. If they wish to make easter eggs and mention a character name that we know this is fine but I do not feel the tv shows must be re imagined. If this does happen I will not be against it but it is not my preference.

They should complete this movie trilogy IMO, gain some new fans and then move on...

I just hope (for the sake of all TREK), that they will NOT one day recast TOS once more, and we will go in circles forever.

Yeah, it worked this time... they should use that, but after that, they should really work out something new. It will get boring with Kirk number 3, 4, 5, 6.... n. ;)

Or, they could just not do anymore ST period. ¿

I'd be fine with that too.

Oh, you know Paramount... they are out for $$$$$$$

No matter how they get it. ;)

Trek will continue, and won't simply end one day. The one way or the other they will find new methods to reinvent it time and again.

Narada

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4008

Report this Nov. 12 2009, 3:48 pm

The thing about being a company is if you are not out for $$$$$ then your company will fail. If your company fails then your company is over. If anyone is the head of a company who is not concerned for making a profit in time they will be fired.

Recently logged in

Users browsing this forum: FleetAdmiral_BamBam

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum