ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

The Romance Thread

batouyukinawa

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 336

Report this Dec. 20 2009, 2:49 pm

Quote (whyaduck @ Dec. 20 2009, 10:03 am)
Quote (batouyukinawa @ Dec. 19 2009, 11:39 pm)
Uh more people then I DO see it guy. Or else T&A shippers would be an original idea. I realize this forum is predominantly T&T shipper bias, however that does not make my claim less pertinent. I realize some of you have to be hit on the head with a tac-hammer to understand certain narrative; but some of us can see this thing called nuances and undertones. It's not so black and white guy. Sorry to be the barer of bad news. You probably like shows like CSI cause they explain everything to you and presume the audience is incapable of this thing called "critical thinking". I'm not trying to be presumptuous, but one must address your idiotic statement of of condescension with relevant observational skills.

Actually, you are pretty condescending. I'm not a shipper of any kind. Archer is my favorite character. Trip a close second. I don't think that an Archer & T'Pol relationship would have happened (though, as I wrote before, I originally wanted that) and that's a good thing. I think that T & T worked, though the writers could have handled it better once they got together. I'm glad it took awhile for them to get to the point where they were in a relationship and that they weren't running around the ship sucking face (haven't used that expression in years - bwahahahaha).

Very funny that you mention condescension in the next sentence after writing that people here aren't smart enough for "critical thinking" and have to watch shows that explain everything. Sheesh.

I was referring only to Middleman, look at my post again. I include people like you and Grigori among the intellectual elite in this thread. I've never had a problem with either of you. Sure, we don't always agree, but we are able to respect each others opinions, and perspectives with respect and consideration. I like to think of myself as someone with an open mind. I was merely lashing back at Middleman's obscene presumptions of me. I apologize if you guys felt that particular post was geared towards you. It was never my intention.

Middleman

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3657

Report this Dec. 20 2009, 4:54 pm

Quote (batouyukinawa @ Dec. 20 2009, 2:49 pm)
Very funny that you mention condescension in the next sentence after writing that people here aren't smart enough for "critical thinking" and have to watch shows that explain everything. Sheesh.

batouyukinawa

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 336

Report this Dec. 20 2009, 6:30 pm

Quote (batouyukinawa @ Dec. 20 2009, 5:42 am)
I know theres a steep learning curve, that crazy concept of discussion; but some of us posess the ability to utilize this function.

I realize your understanding of the English language appears to be problematic at best; but I said "US". This is a crazy word I, and many others use to include a undetermined collection of people in a very vague sense. You can also use words such as "they", "them","we", as well as many others. If I was referring to myself in a very explicite matter, I would have phrased it like so...

"I know theres a steep learning curve, that crazy concept of discussion; but I posess the ability to utilize this function, unlike most on this thread"

There..see? It's way different. I suggest looking at these two examples so that you don't appear to others as if English is your second, perhaps third language.

Cule

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 0

Report this Dec. 20 2009, 6:41 pm

Quote (batouyukinawa @ Dec. 21 2009, 12:30 am)
I suggest looking at these two examples so that you don't appear to others as if English is your second, perhaps third language.

English is MY second language, but I'm pretty sure I understand the word "redundancy" better than you...

batouyukinawa

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 336

Report this Dec. 20 2009, 7:49 pm

I'm sorry, this thread does pertain to thwarted romances. So my redundant behavior, as you so call it, is only circumstantial. What other prospective romances are there?

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum