SaturnsRings GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Oct. 29 2009, 10:22 pm
I like this design. 
|
PhantomCrunk007 GROUP: Members POSTS: 5088 |
Report this
Oct. 29 2009, 11:45 pm
| Quote (SaturnsRings @ Oct. 29 2009, 7:22 am) | I like this design.
 |
THat is a tight design.. Looks tough.
|
PhantomCrunk007 GROUP: Members POSTS: 5088 |
Report this
Oct. 30 2009, 3:13 am
| Quote (ZeroArmour @ Oct. 29 2009, 12:11 pm) | | Pity they didn't make a movie about Kirk taking on that bad boy, instead we go lumped with a "Nemesis" knock-off. |
Well, this much we can agree on. That would have been cool.
|
skynyrd04 GROUP: Members POSTS: 258 |
Report this
Oct. 31 2009, 10:42 pm
That maybe the best ship design I've seen from the movie.
|
WkdYngMan GROUP: Members POSTS: 3948 |
Report this
Nov. 01 2009, 12:08 am
| Quote (ZeroArmour @ Oct. 30 2009, 3:11 am) | | Pity they didn't make a movie about Kirk taking on that bad boy, instead we go lumped with a "Nemesis" knock-off. |
The Scimitar and Narada are hardly anything alike. That isn't even an opinion either.
|
WkdYngMan GROUP: Members POSTS: 3948 |
Report this
Nov. 02 2009, 3:25 am
| Quote (ZeroArmour @ Nov. 02 2009, 2:42 am) | Huge, seemingly unbeatable ships, capable of laying waste to whole planets...
Sounds very alike to me. |
You just described several things, even in terms of Star Trek. Now you're getting into the whole "So if it has a saucer, two nacelles, and an engineering section then it must be the Enterprise" type of thing. Very loose and too broad.
|
Pooneil GROUP: Members POSTS: 934 |
Report this
Nov. 02 2009, 3:33 am
It looks pretty much exactly like the original Klingon ships with a bunch of extra knick-knacks and bits and pieces glued onto it. I think it looked better the first time round.
And the last thing I want to see in the next movie is "Kirk vs. The Klingons, Part XVIII"!
|
WkdYngMan GROUP: Members POSTS: 3948 |
Report this
Nov. 02 2009, 4:10 am
Oh I don't know, not much. Just the size, layout, shape, origin, function, etc.
|
DarthRage GROUP: Members POSTS: 289 |
Report this
Nov. 02 2009, 10:49 am
| Quote (WkdYngMan @ Nov. 02 2009, 4:10 am) | | Oh I don't know, not much. ¿Just the size, layout, shape, origin, function, etc. |
weapons systems, one can cloak, the other cannot, crew (military vs civilian miners),
|
Kdbtrekkin GROUP: Members POSTS: 3634 |
Report this
Nov. 04 2009, 2:46 am
| Quote (WkdYngMan @ Nov. 01 2009, 12:08 am) | | Quote (ZeroArmour @ Oct. 30 2009, 3:11 am) | | Pity they didn't make a movie about Kirk taking on that bad boy, instead we go lumped with a "Nemesis" knock-off. |
The Scimitar and Narada are hardly anything alike. ¿That isn't even an opinion either. |
No but they both involve Romulans, one's crazy one is a human raised by Remans who tries to take over Romulus who is crazy.
|
Captain_Storma GROUP: Members POSTS: 11836 |
Report this
Nov. 04 2009, 9:14 am
Looks like a D7 prototype.
|
WkdYngMan GROUP: Members POSTS: 3948 |
Report this
Nov. 05 2009, 3:44 am
| Quote (ZeroArmour @ Nov. 05 2009, 3:03 am) | So, they just look diffrent, and have diffrent sets, have a diffrent back story...
But they are both... |
Yes, hence they're different. | Quote | | seemingly unbeatable ships, |
Like almost every other enemy ship in Star Trek. | Quote | | And commanded by men driven by revenge! |
Right, nothing to do with the ship.
|
WkdYngMan GROUP: Members POSTS: 3948 |
Report this
Nov. 06 2009, 2:25 pm
| Quote (ZeroArmour @ Nov. 05 2009, 3:46 am) | | Quote (WkdYngMan @ Nov. 05 2009, 3:44 am) | | Quote (ZeroArmour @ Nov. 05 2009, 3:03 am) | So, they just look diffrent, and have diffrent sets, have a diffrent back story...
But they are both... |
Yes, hence they're different.
| Quote | | seemingly unbeatable ships, |
Like almost every other enemy ship in Star Trek.
| Quote | | And commanded by men driven by revenge! |
Right, nothing to do with the ship. |
Um, WYM. I don't want to freak you out or anything...
But you just agreed with me!
 |
Not on your best day kid. If you we're paying attention I just said it was hardly anything like the scimitar (which looking at what I just said and what you've established then it's hardly anything of a "Scimitar knock-off.") Thanks for playing, "have a toffee."
|
Narada GROUP: Members POSTS: 4006 |
Report this
Nov. 06 2009, 4:10 pm
No really I must agree with you both except these comments are from 2 different sides of a spectrum. There are similarities and differences which are explained in this thread. Just because they are not exactly the same does not mean they do not have similarities. You also mention about the broadness of making a general description for the Enterprise. If we look at all ships named Enterprise there are general similarities and also differences. However they all exist with the same components in a similar configuration. The shapes and sizes of these components also have both similarities and differences.
I wish to see more Klingon ships in upcoming Star Trek movies. I like to see them in the Koboyashi Maru simulation and the deleted scene. I like the design for this ship.
|
Vice_Adm_Baxter GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Nov. 06 2009, 4:35 pm
| Quote (ZeroArmour @ Nov. 01 2009, 11:42 pm) | | Quote (WkdYngMan @ Nov. 01 2009, 12:08 am) | | Quote (ZeroArmour @ Oct. 30 2009, 3:11 am) | | Pity they didn't make a movie about Kirk taking on that bad boy, instead we go lumped with a "Nemesis" knock-off. |
The Scimitar and Narada are hardly anything alike. ?That isn't even an opinion either. |
Huge, seemingly unbeatable ships, capable of laying waste to whole planets...
Sounds very alike to me. |
Sounds just like a Borg cube, Whale Probe ship from TVH, Species 8472 bio-ship........... Need I go on? Evidently not because your double standard legitimizes these ships because they are from the TNG era of TREK.
|