ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

New Star Trek Series ? YES or NO??

MARVELDC

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 11

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 1:38 am

Plain and simple question.
Do we want a new Star Trek series within the next few years? Say around 2 years at the most.

When or where it will be set is up to Paramount. Let's just give them our feelings on the subject of whether we want one or not  shall we!

starkorn

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1239

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 1:51 am

Yes, They need to try it again, with a new crew maybe?

lostshaker

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2293

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 3:52 am

A series will be great if it is set in the only true universe - the one that existed from 1966 to 2005. If anything else then I'd have to lean towards NO.

TashaYar86

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3588

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 5:42 am

Quote (lostshaker @ Oct. 26 2009, 3:52 am)
A series will be great if it is set in the only true universe - the one that existed from 1966 to 2005. If anything else then I'd have to lean towards NO.

I so agree. :logical:

ItalianTiberius24

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 177

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 10:59 am

Quote (lostshaker @ Oct. 26 2009, 3:52 am)
A series will be great if it is set in the only true universe - the one that existed from 1966 to 2005. If anything else then I'd have to lean towards NO.

i agree 100,010 %.....nobody wants gay melrose 90210 jj trek...except a few people on here

Vger23

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6799

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 1:11 pm

I voted "no." They should allow the current movie series to conclude before trying to over-saturate the market with Trek again.

DammitJim6200

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6876

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 4:14 pm

Quote (Vger23 @ Oct. 25 2009, 2:11 pm)
I voted "no." They should allow the current movie series to conclude before trying to over-saturate the market with Trek again.

I voted no too, we should all wait until the next JJ Abrams idiotic Star Trek movie BOMBS then we would get what we ALL want.. A true Star trek series. ;)

Rose_Red

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 172

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 7:18 pm

Quote (lostshaker @ Oct. 26 2009, 3:52 am)
A series will be great if it is set in the only true universe - the one that existed from 1966 to 2005. If anything else then I'd have to lean towards NO.

Agreed 100%.

Captan_jean_luc_picard_1A

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 426

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 8:00 pm

I voted undecided.

Because I am not sure how Paramount will go.

Will they continue with there LAME reboot or go back to our loyal one?

the 11th movie is bringing in new fans, I approve as a one time thing.

But our universe, the true one is the best direction.

So if they return I say YES.

if they don't, screw it.  I wont watch it.  Because if I wanted crap I will just go rent a Star Wars movie.

Its what I believe.  Bottom line.  I am not arguing.  Its just what I will do according to there action.

So I beg paramount to make the RIGHT choice.

Vger23

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6799

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 9:11 pm

Quote (DammitJim6200 @ Oct. 26 2009, 4:14 pm)
Quote (Vger23 @ Oct. 25 2009, 2:11 pm)
I voted "no." They should allow the current movie series to conclude before trying to over-saturate the market with Trek again.

I voted no too, we should all wait until the next JJ Abrams idiotic Star Trek movie BOMBS then we would get what we ALL want.. A true Star trek series. ;)




;)

Vger23

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6799

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 9:17 pm

Quote (ItalianTiberius24 @ Oct. 26 2009, 10:59 am)
Quote (lostshaker @ Oct. 26 2009, 3:52 am)
A series will be great if it is set in the only true universe - the one that existed from 1966 to 2005. If anything else then I'd have to lean towards NO.

i agree 100,010 %.....nobody wants gay melrose 90210 jj trek...except a few people on here



@#$%!!! I MAKE MY MONTHY #@R%$ APPEARANCE TO YELL and @%&*#!!!

@#&*!!! JJ %&$$# ABRAMS!!!!!

kvlc

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 306

Report this Oct. 26 2009, 11:28 pm

Yes, although I don't want it to be with the cast of the new films.  That would just be incredibly lame trying to set up for alternate timeline TOS.

DammitJim6200

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6876

Report this Oct. 27 2009, 1:25 pm

Quote (Vger23 @ Oct. 25 2009, 10:11 pm)
Quote (DammitJim6200 @ Oct. 26 2009, 4:14 pm)
Quote (Vger23 @ Oct. 25 2009, 2:11 pm)
I voted "no." They should allow the current movie series to conclude before trying to over-saturate the market with Trek again.

I voted no too, we should all wait until the next JJ Abrams idiotic Star Trek movie BOMBS then we would get what we ALL want.. A true Star trek series. ;)




;)

Oh Vger, I'm glad you still care,
you with your foolish pictures again,
I'm sory we disagree but you must see the light, that idiotic UN-Talented rat JJ Abrams destroyed Star Trek ,
you must understand this, my dear dear friend.
:(

Vger23

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6799

Report this Oct. 27 2009, 1:59 pm

Quote (DammitJim6200 @ Oct. 27 2009, 1:25 pm)
Quote (Vger23 @ Oct. 25 2009, 10:11 pm)
Quote (DammitJim6200 @ Oct. 26 2009, 4:14 pm)
Quote (Vger23 @ Oct. 25 2009, 2:11 pm)
I voted "no." They should allow the current movie series to conclude before trying to over-saturate the market with Trek again.

I voted no too, we should all wait until the next JJ Abrams idiotic Star Trek movie BOMBS then we would get what we ALL want.. A true Star trek series. ;)




;)

Oh Vger, I'm glad you still care,
you with your foolish pictures again,
I'm sory we disagree but you must see the light, that idiotic UN-Talented rat JJ Abrams destroyed Star Trek ,
you must understand this, my dear dear friend.
:(

DJ,

I would respect and understand you if you didn't ramble on like some goof from the Star Trek crazy farm.

I have no problem with you not liking the movie (even though you posted how you were wrong and really enjoyed it and "understood what Abrams was trying to do" after you had seen it.)

Now, these days when you post, you're not looking to engage in an exchange...you're simply looking to irritate people and get attention. You basically post the same thing over and over and over again.

1. It's not necessary because, I assure you, everyone is well aware of your thoughts on this topic.

2. You make yourself sound like a malfunctioning automaton.

3. You're just looking to stir up conflict and idiocy, which amazingly enough, you excel at.

I'm glad you like my pictures. They are almost as humorous as you.

¿;)

DammitJim6200

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6876

Report this Oct. 27 2009, 4:11 pm

Quote (Vger23 @ Oct. 26 2009, 2:59 pm)
Quote (DammitJim6200 @ Oct. 27 2009, 1:25 pm)
Quote (Vger23 @ Oct. 25 2009, 10:11 pm)
Quote (DammitJim6200 @ Oct. 26 2009, 4:14 pm)
Quote (Vger23 @ Oct. 25 2009, 2:11 pm)
I voted "no." They should allow the current movie series to conclude before trying to over-saturate the market with Trek again.

I voted no too, we should all wait until the next JJ Abrams idiotic Star Trek movie BOMBS then we would get what we ALL want.. A true Star trek series. ;)




;)

Oh Vger, I'm glad you still care,
you with your foolish pictures again,
I'm sory we disagree but you must see the light, that idiotic UN-Talented rat JJ Abrams destroyed Star Trek ,
you must understand this, my dear dear friend.
:(

DJ,

I would respect and understand you if you didn't ramble on like some goof from the Star Trek crazy farm.

I have no problem with you not liking the movie (even though you posted how you were wrong and really enjoyed it and "understood what Abrams was trying to do" after you had seen it.)

Now, these days when you post, you're not looking to engage in an exchange...you're simply looking to irritate people and get attention. You basically post the same thing over and over and over again.

1. It's not necessary because, I assure you, everyone is well aware of your thoughts on this topic.

2. You make yourself sound like a malfunctioning automaton.

3. You're just looking to stir up conflict and idiocy, which amazingly enough, you excel at.

I'm glad you like my pictures. They are almost as humorous as you.

?;)

Vger........Look..Not everyone knows me or how I feel..No one knows how Star Trek has been my life for years..If I ramble on I will try to control it, if you stop making fun of me with those silly pictures..

I and alot of people feel betrayed by those ingrates at Paramount who allowed that fat head RAT JJ Abrams destroy Star Trek,
surely you must realize this movie isen't what Trek is suppose to be,
surely you must realize Star Trek is going down the wrong path, I don't care if it made 4 billion dallors,
if enough of us make our concerns known maybe one of those idiots at Paramount will take notice.

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum