kanig8 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1120 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 4:35 am
| Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 15 2009, 1:36 am) | Yeah, like those polls aren't fixed.  |
Well, those from Trek-specialized sites may be biased. It is those from independent sites that would be more fair and impartial.
|
WkdYngMan GROUP: Members POSTS: 3948 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 4:38 am
| Quote (Captain_Storma @ Aug. 15 2009, 4:14 am) | Again... just numbers. It's for the people who do not have real friends to talk about it.
Numbers show you nothing, but what you want to see... a little more critical ?and demographic analysis and you would find out who is behind that numbers. But I guess that's just too much work.
And again... maybe some gushers simply voted multiple times to boost the rating. |
Actually, at least in the case of TrekBBS, TrekMovie (and seemingly TrekWeb,) you can't. TrekBBS is a heavily moderated forum and they don't tolerate multiple accounts. TrekMovie's polls allow one vote per IP Address, per poll. Just tried a spare vote on TrekWeb, it didn't change the results since I had voted there before. | Quote | | Or maybe you should go out and ask people how they liked it. |
For someone like me, the applause the film got in the filled-to-capacity IMAX was all the "Street Polling" on the opening Saturday Night I needed right then, something I can honestly say I hadn't experienced in a long time! However, I am not saying a "non-applause" means the opposite, when it usually doesn't, but I can't imagine everyone applauding for a film they didn't like.
|
Unregistered_Guest GROUP: Members POSTS: 857 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 4:41 am
| Quote (kanig8 @ Aug. 15 2009, 1:35 am) | | Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 15 2009, 1:36 am) | Yeah, like those polls aren't fixed.  |
Well, those from Trek-specialized sites may be biased. It is those from independent sites that would be more fair and impartial. |
Like Rotten Tomatoes perhaps, which rates the film in the high 90s percent positive. And those ratings come from industry pros who know of what they speak.
|
|
GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 4:41 am
| Quote (Unregistered_Guest @ Aug. 15 2009, 4:41 am) | | Quote (kanig8 @ Aug. 15 2009, 1:35 am) | | Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 15 2009, 1:36 am) | Yeah, like those polls aren't fixed.  |
Well, those from Trek-specialized sites may be biased. It is those from independent sites that would be more fair and impartial. |
Like Rotten Tomatoes perhaps, which rates the film in the high 90s percent positive. ¿And those ratings come from industry pros who know of what they speak. |
They're idiots.
|
|
GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 4:43 am
| Quote (WkdYngMan @ Aug. 15 2009, 4:38 am) | | For someone like me, the applause the film got in the filled-to-capacity IMAX was all the "Street Polling" on the opening Saturday Night I needed right then, something I can honestly say I hadn't experienced in a long time! ¿However, I am not saying a "non-applause" means the opposite, when it usually doesn't, but I can't imagine everyone applauding for a film they didn't like. |
Bringing your family along to applaud the movie doesn't count.
|
Unregistered_Guest GROUP: Members POSTS: 857 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 4:51 am
| Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 15 2009, 1:41 am) | | Quote (Unregistered_Guest @ Aug. 15 2009, 4:41 am) | | Quote (kanig8 @ Aug. 15 2009, 1:35 am) | | Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 15 2009, 1:36 am) | Yeah, like those polls aren't fixed.  |
Well, those from Trek-specialized sites may be biased. It is those from independent sites that would be more fair and impartial. |
Like Rotten Tomatoes perhaps, which rates the film in the high 90s percent positive. ?And those ratings come from industry pros who know of what they speak. |
They're idiots. |
So the amateur fans are wrong, the professional critics are wrong, and the industry insiders are wrong. What group is left, the lunatic fringe?
|
|
GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 5:01 am
Yep. They're all wrong.
|
PhantomCrunk007 GROUP: Members POSTS: 5088 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 8:49 pm
| Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 14 2009, 2:01 pm) | Yep. They're all wrong. |
And there you have it people. BrianHMay is the only one who is right.
|
|
GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 8:54 pm
| Quote (PhantomCrunk007 @ Aug. 15 2009, 8:49 pm) | | Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 14 2009, 2:01 pm) | Yep. They're all wrong. |
And there you have it people.
BrianHMay is the only one who is right. |
You got that right. For once.
|
PhantomCrunk007 GROUP: Members POSTS: 5088 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 8:58 pm
| Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 15 2009, 5:54 am) | | Quote (PhantomCrunk007 @ Aug. 15 2009, 8:49 pm) | | Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 14 2009, 2:01 pm) | Yep. They're all wrong. |
And there you have it people.
BrianHMay is the only one who is right. |
You got that right. For once. |
Yeah, keep thinking you have any credibility.
|
|
GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 8:59 pm
I got more credibility then a sheep like you.
|
PhantomCrunk007 GROUP: Members POSTS: 5088 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 9:08 pm
| Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 15 2009, 5:59 am) | | I got more credibility then a sheep like you. |
Whatever helps you sleep better. I'm not the one posting under different screen names and denying it.
|
|
GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 9:11 pm
There's nothing to deny. This is the only name I've used.
|
PhantomCrunk007 GROUP: Members POSTS: 5088 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 9:15 pm
| Quote (BrianHMay @ Aug. 15 2009, 6:11 am) | There's nothing to deny. This is the only name I've used. |
And you're liar.
|
|
GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Aug. 15 2009, 9:17 pm
I'm truthful. You're paranoid.
|