ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

Enterprise E was...

nextgeneration14

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 463

Report this Aug. 11 2009, 3:45 pm

You decide!!

defiant_12

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 178

Report this Aug. 11 2009, 6:54 pm

Is there such thing as "overly armed"?

Holberg

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1047

Report this Aug. 11 2009, 11:18 pm

This ship was to much like Voyager for my liking :eyesroll:

guideX

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2402

Report this Aug. 11 2009, 11:46 pm

I thought it looked great. The exterior looked high tech, fast, aerodynamic (even though that doesn't matter in space), and overall appealing to look at. During Nemesis you get a computer animated version, and a model during some scenes, so you get to see it as both.

The interior was equally great. Has a luxurious engineering section (you get to see a lot of it in First Contact), the bridge floor is really great because of the blue light. I kind of miss the Enterprise D bridge shape, if not the carpeting and colors.

Not to mention the only ship to feature a gimble on the main bridge, as seen in Nemesis (even if the movie was bad, the bridge was great).

Khoufu_Khorushu

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3694

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 12:11 am

I didn't care for it, too flat. And the deflector dish-thing waspointing halfway at the bottom at the saucer section; if it were a weapon it would have destroyed the ship. I wonder what a saucer seperation would have looked like.

Captain_Storma

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 11836

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 9:23 am

Quote (starbase63 @ Aug. 12 2009, 6:16 pm)
The Sovereign class was one of the sweetest designs of the modern Trek era...



There's an ugraded version set for use in the STO game...if it ever gets going...



:logical:

... sexy.

The first picture: I fell in love with this ship the moment I saw it in FC flying out of that nebula.

The second picture: As all STO ships...  :sick:

NuclearWessels

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 9845

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 9:27 am

Exterior, awesome ship

Interior, not a big fan of the bridge, or the color scheme of the corridors, etc.

Commander_Zelkar

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 7249

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 9:37 am

I like the design, but always thought it looked like a modified Excelsior class.

Captain_Storma

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 11836

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 9:40 am

Quote (Commander_Zelkar @ Aug. 12 2009, 6:37 pm)
I like the design, but always thought it looked like a modified Excelsior class.

That's exactly what it was supposed to be ;)

The Sovereign-Class was developed to replace the 100 year old Excelsior-Class for multipurpose missions.

I love the interior, especially the bridge, it look big and intimidating. In fact the darker the better.
I loved the Generations refit of the Galaxy-Class, which also was darker and more functional.

ebbandit

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1039

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 9:43 am

It was better than Enterprise D, but none compare to NCC-1701.

Captain_Storma

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 11836

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 9:44 am

Quote (ebbandit @ Aug. 12 2009, 6:43 pm)
It was better than Enterprise D, but none compare to NCC-1701.

In your opinion ;)

Vice_Adm_Baxter

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 0

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 10:20 am

way to cool for Picard

tribblenator999

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3818

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 10:47 am

Quote (Captain_Storma @ Aug. 12 2009, 9:40 am)
Quote (Commander_Zelkar @ Aug. 12 2009, 6:37 pm)
I like the design, but always thought it looked like a modified Excelsior class.

That's exactly what it was supposed to be ;)

The Sovereign-Class was developed to replace the 100 year old Excelsior-Class for multipurpose missions.

I love the interior, especially the bridge, it look big and intimidating. In fact the darker the better.
I loved the Generations refit of the Galaxy-Class, which also was darker and more functional.

actually the sovereign class was to replace the aging galaxy class ships.

the akira class ships replaced the excelsior.

tribblenator999

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3818

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 10:49 am

Enterprise-E looked like a weirdly modified refit connie.  Don't like the interior. Don't like the bridge. I mean for a battleship they still have 3 freakin chairs on the bridge.

tribblenator999

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3818

Report this Aug. 12 2009, 11:52 am

Quote (starbase63 @ Aug. 12 2009, 11:24 am)
Quote (tribblenator999 @ Aug. 12 2009, 10:49 am)
Enterprise-E looked like a weirdly modified refit connie. ?Don't like the interior. Don't like the bridge. I mean for a battleship they still have 3 freakin chairs on the bridge.

The Sovereign class wasn't considered a battleship...

:logical:

good god does starfleet have any ships that are made for battle.  :O

Recently logged in

Users browsing this forum: Narada, 22123magic

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum