Star Trek

I will smite those that call me a girl!

Quote (Goodchild @ Aug. 09 2009, 3:59 pm)

Quote (loveroftrekmen @ Aug. 09 2009, 12:13 pm) God is not a he to begin with Goodchild. ?God is has no gender. ?God is only a God to those who believe he is God. ?In a sense, God could simply be a manifestation of our Godlike connections to universe. ?God could be the idea of moralistic beahvior. God could be an interdimensional being (ST 5). ?God could be an omnipotent being that has left the Earth behind. ?God could be dead. ?There are of course many more possibilities to consider, but this could on forever. ?There is no standing proof of what or where God is or exists. ?The bible is too vague and was written by men and written on their intrepretations of God. ?Nor is it specific enough to get a clear idea of God. ?We have no proof as to what or who God is. So which person is talking this time? Even you would be a "mystery" to God, whichever one that is? God is genderless, if it is god of the bible. The "He" is used because it is in the "masculine" usage of the language, meaning that in order for us to understand, is that the Man is the head covering for the Woman, so "He" has to do with order of creation. But you probably didn't know that?

The problem is you had to just look that up Goodchild.  If you had read any of the threads you post in, you woudl have seen us already discuss the fact that man wrote the bible and thus used the mascuine pronouns.  

You also are rude.  Do you have a problem debating with women?  If you want we can debate cam2cam. I have no problem rpoviding proof I am a woman.  Do you have a problem providing proof your a man or woman?

Quote (Splurk @ Aug. 09 2009, 7:52 am)

Quote (SpaceYeti @ Aug. 09 2009, 8:35 am) Wooo, tautology! Nope, that would be 'Is God God?' I would say, no, God is not a god. Proof: Let God be a god, by definition, God is then omnipotent and thus can do any thing. So He can then create any rock. Including a rock so large that he cannot put it up his own arse. But that means there is some thing He cannot do, but if he were a god, he could do any thing. Thus, God cannot be a god by contradiction, quod erat demonstrandum.

Oh, geeze. That whole argument, and all types of it, are just plain silly. The inability to contradict your own potency does not make you less than omnipotent. Obviously omnipotence does not give you the ability to create a situation where you're unable to do something, since you can do anything. Basically, just because God cannot contradict logic (essentially the realization that contradictions are never real), it does not mean he's less able. Is God not omnipotent simply because he cannot create a square circle? No, he simply cannot do anything that contradicts his ability to do things, because he can do anything! Duh! This sort of argument isn't an argument against God's existence, it's merely playing with words.

Easier disproof; Being unable to make a rock you cannot lift is not a limitation!

I haven't got an identity crisis like you have LOTM.

So I looked it up, really?

Rude? Don't be absurd!

I'm still waiting for you to give SY your details so that he can vouch for you, cam2cam.