ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

What should Star Trek X have been?

Ali88

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 889

Report this Aug. 03 2009, 7:13 pm

I think it should have been the resurrection of James T Kirk, defiantly

SpaceTherapist

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6370

Report this Aug. 03 2009, 7:56 pm

I love Kirk but if you keep killing main characters only to bring them back to life then any time a main character dies it is less dramatic because you know in the Star Trek universe death isn't permanent.

31st_Century_Temporal_Age
nt

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 845

Report this Aug. 03 2009, 8:01 pm

Maybe 20 or 30 years from now we will find out the fate of James Kirk in our new timeline. Oh boy. It sounds so weird saying that now.

nextgeneration14

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 463

Report this Aug. 03 2009, 9:15 pm

Nemesis... but better? that would be nice.

NuclearWessels

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 9845

Report this Aug. 04 2009, 10:52 am

Quote (nextgeneration14 @ Aug. 03 2009, 7:15 pm)
Nemesis... but better? that would be nice.

maybe something that didn't involve clones (which seemed to be the fad in sci fi that year)

Captain_Storma

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 11836

Report this Aug. 04 2009, 11:35 am

Quote (Ali88 @ Aug. 04 2009, 4:13 am)
I think it should have been the resurrection of James T Kirk, defiantly

You mean XI right? Cause X was IMO close to perfect.  :cool:

DarthRage

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 289

Report this Aug. 05 2009, 11:41 am

I always wanted to see Q in theatrical release. Endless possiblilies with him. And I loved the character. His banter with Picard was always the best.

Narada

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4008

Report this Aug. 05 2009, 1:41 pm

Quote (nextgeneration14 @ Aug. 03 2009, 9:15 pm)
Nemesis... but better? that would be nice.

:logical:

Captain_Storma

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 11836

Report this Aug. 05 2009, 2:32 pm

Quote (Narada @ Aug. 05 2009, 10:41 pm)
Quote (nextgeneration14 @ Aug. 03 2009, 9:15 pm)
Nemesis... but better? that would be nice.

:logical:

NEMESIS extended version. Total runtime 160 minutes.  :cool:

Khoufu_Khorushu

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3694

Report this Aug. 06 2009, 12:04 am

They really need a movie with Q, or at least back then before he aged 10 years.

FederationJakeship

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 114

Report this Aug. 06 2009, 12:06 am

Quote (Khoufu_Khorushu @ Aug. 06 2009, 12:04 am)
They really need a movie with Q, or at least back then before he aged 10 years.

Sounds like a fun idea.I wish he would show up in the next movie. :cool:

Khoufu_Khorushu

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 3694

Report this Aug. 06 2009, 12:09 am

Quote (FederationJakeship @ Aug. 05 2009, 10:06 pm)
Quote (Khoufu_Khorushu @ Aug. 06 2009, 12:04 am)
They really need a movie with Q, or at least back then before he aged 10 years.

Sounds like a fun idea.I wish he would show up in the next movie. :cool:

A lot of people are wondering what Kirk would do if Q showed up to him, and it would totally be an awesome movie.

Jepoy2

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 322

Report this Aug. 07 2009, 11:19 am

Nemesis

Captain_Storma

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 11836

Report this Aug. 08 2009, 7:03 am

Quote (trekbuff @ Aug. 06 2009, 9:07 am)
I voted NEMESIS, but not hacked to bits and someone else as Shinzon. jaksajak suggested James Marsters and I couldn't agree more.

Maybe 10 to 20 minutes longer.

They were actually considering Jude Law for that part for quite some time.

Vger23

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6799

Report this Aug. 08 2009, 9:51 am

I voted for "Nemesis."

Everything could always be better or different, and everyone's tastes vary widely. I think "Nemesis" is just fine.

Recently logged in

Users browsing this forum: Dryson3

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum