Corwin8 GROUP: Members POSTS: 8468  |
Report this
Jul. 19 2009, 10:57 pm
Your Obama Recovery at work. Sliced Ham.I wonder what the other bids were? And these assclowns want to run healthcare and save the planet with cap and trade. Good luck.  ?  | Quote | Description of Work/Service performed
2 POUND FROZEN HAM SLICED
|
|
CO_Fowler GROUP: Members POSTS: 5488 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 12:14 am
 That's just wrong! Any way you slice it :: giggles :: Sorry but I had to say that last bit  |
Dyslexus_of_Brog GROUP: Members POSTS: 3953 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 12:22 am
That's $595,600 per pound! Damm!  |
|
Corwin8 GROUP: Members POSTS: 8468 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 9:03 am
I wonder why the media has not covered this? It's from the government not some wacko website
|
SLagonia GROUP: Members POSTS: 18170 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 10:25 am
| Quote (Corwin8 @ July 19 2009, 12:03 pm) | | I wonder why the media has not covered this? ¿It's from the government not some wacko website |
Think about what you just said for a minute. You're surprised the media - The guys who got Obama elected - won't report a misuse of government money. |
chr3335 GROUP: Members POSTS: 7914 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 10:33 am
can't wait to see what he will be spending for his healthcare plan |
|
Corwin8 GROUP: Members POSTS: 8468 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 10:59 am
| Quote (SLagonia @ July 20 2009, 10:25 am) | | Quote (Corwin8 @ July 19 2009, 12:03 pm) | | I wonder why the media has not covered this? ?It's from the government not some wacko website |
Think about what you just said for a minute. ¿You're surprised the media - The guys who got Obama elected - won't report a misuse of government money. |
Sorry, forgot to add the sarcasm disclaimer, my bad. |
Admiral_JTK GROUP: Members POSTS: 4833 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 2:23 pm
"That's some pig!"
|
trekhed68 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1579 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 2:50 pm
Ummm...perhaps you should delve into the details a little more closely before you post something like this. The $1.191 million figure cited was for 760,000 pounds of ham, not two. That works out to around $1.50 per pound. The "two pounds" refers to the size of the packaging, and the food was purchased for food banks and soup kitchens... |
Vice_Adm_Baxter GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 2:55 pm
| Quote (trekhed68 @ July 20 2009, 11:50 am) | | Ummm...perhaps you should delve into the details a little more closely before you post something like this. The $1.191 million figure cited was for 760,000 pounds of ham, not two. That works out to around $1.50 per pound. The "two pounds" refers to the size of the packaging, and the food was purchased for food banks and soup kitchens... |
Just goes to show people believe what they wish and twist the truth to serve their ends. Good Job! |
|
Corwin8 GROUP: Members POSTS: 8468 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 3:03 pm
| Quote (Vice_Adm_Baxter @ July 20 2009, 2:55 pm) | | Quote (trekhed68 @ July 20 2009, 11:50 am) | | Ummm...perhaps you should delve into the details a little more closely before you post something like this. The $1.191 million figure cited was for 760,000 pounds of ham, not two. That works out to around $1.50 per pound. The "two pounds" refers to the size of the packaging, and the food was purchased for food banks and soup kitchens... |
Just goes to show people believe what they wish and twist the truth to serve their ends.
Good Job! |
Just goes to show the government can't create a clear website and that they still paid too much. Glad to see it addressed. Where is the truth twisted? The page is unclear at best. It's their website, nothing twisted at all. |
akebono62 GROUP: Members POSTS: 19766 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 3:04 pm
| Quote (trekhed68 @ July 20 2009, 11:50 am) | | Ummm...perhaps you should delve into the details a little more closely before you post something like this. The $1.191 million figure cited was for 760,000 pounds of ham, not two. That works out to around $1.50 per pound. The "two pounds" refers to the size of the packaging, and the food was purchased for food banks and soup kitchens... |
$1.57 per pound is still a little high for a 760,000 pound order- depending on the quality. |
|
chr3335 GROUP: Members POSTS: 7914 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 3:23 pm
| Quote (akebono62 @ July 19 2009, 4:04 pm) | | Quote (trekhed68 @ July 20 2009, 11:50 am) | | Ummm...perhaps you should delve into the details a little more closely before you post something like this. The $1.191 million figure cited was for 760,000 pounds of ham, not two. That works out to around $1.50 per pound. The "two pounds" refers to the size of the packaging, and the food was purchased for food banks and soup kitchens... |
$1.57 per pound is still a little high for a 760,000 pound order- depending on the quality. |
So they make an unclear website then tell us don't worry we are only buying ham at around twice the rate why does this not make me feel better about it? |
Red_Shirt_Casualty GROUP: Members POSTS: 1812 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 7:06 pm
Talk about pork spending...
Bah dum bum...
Sorry, couldn't resist.
But seriously, this should just go to prove that the government can't be trusted to spend your money at all wisely. Imagine how much more they could have fed, if they spent a bit more thriftly.
|
|
Vice_Adm_Baxter GROUP: Members POSTS: 0 |
Report this
Jul. 20 2009, 11:55 pm
| Quote (Corwin8 @ July 20 2009, 12:03 pm) | | Quote (Vice_Adm_Baxter @ July 20 2009, 2:55 pm) | | Quote (trekhed68 @ July 20 2009, 11:50 am) | | Ummm...perhaps you should delve into the details a little more closely before you post something like this. The $1.191 million figure cited was for 760,000 pounds of ham, not two. That works out to around $1.50 per pound. The "two pounds" refers to the size of the packaging, and the food was purchased for food banks and soup kitchens... |
Just goes to show people believe what they wish and twist the truth to serve their ends.
Good Job! |
Just goes to show the government can't create a clear website and that they still paid too much.
Glad to see it addressed.
Where is the truth twisted? ¿The page is unclear at best. It's their website, nothing twisted at all. |
I was reffering to the topic, not the website. Although I do appriciate you pointing out a poorly done web site. |
