Star Trek

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 4:37 pm

Let's face it, this nut-fest movie from the untalented JJ Abrams is the surprise hit of the year,
But clearly this film isen't a hit with some of us fans..
Many times Abrams slap Loyalist and purist in the face claiming the movie isen't for us, "This movie isen't for fans of Star Trek."
but he's right, this lame movie isen't for us, he turned Star Trek into a immature, LOUD silly joy ride with no real story or substance, just glitter,

Showing no appreciation for the brilliant TOS whatsoever
turning Kirk and Spock into two manneqiuns with no personality..

Making Chekov into a silly annoying boy, who shouldn't be no where near a Flagship.

Turning a dignified women like Uhura into a desperate, irritating go getter.

Not to mention the horrendous new versions of Engineering, the Bridge and the Enterprise itself, clearly and insult to Matt Jefferies.

And those STUPID belts they got to carry the Phaser and communicator, Roddenberry would NEVER allowed that stupidity,

Those are just a few, I know many purist has problems with this overrated movie,
so express it here,
but be kind, JJ Abrams or some of his lackeys might be reading this and who knows we might give them good advice !

Only those who have a gripe about this dumb movie comment..  

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 4:40 pm

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 5:24 pm

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 5:25 pm

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 6:15 pm

The story (oh story, where were you).

Quite surprisingly the cast or redesign did not bother me that much. If the movie actually had a story (not that line up of SFX and action scenes) it might have even turned out decent.

But as it stands...  

IMO

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 7:00 pm

Quote (DammitJim6200 @ June 20 2009, 1:37 am)

Let's face it, this nut-fest movie from the untalented JJ Abrams is the surprise hit of the year, But clearly this film isen't a hit with some of us fans.. Many times Abrams slap Loyalist and purist in the face claiming the movie isen't for us, "This movie isen't for fans of Star Trek." but he's right, this lame movie isen't for us, he turned Star Trek into a immature, LOUD silly joy ride with no real story or substance, just glitter, Showing no appreciation for the brilliant TOS whatsoever turning Kirk and Spock into two manneqiuns with no personality.. Making Chekov into a silly annoying boy, who shouldn't be no where near a Flagship. Turning a dignified women like Uhura into a desperate, irritating go getter. Not to mention the horrendous new versions of Engineering, the Bridge and the Enterprise itself, clearly and insult to Matt Jefferies. And those STUPID belts they got to carry the Phaser and communicator, Roddenberry would NEVER allowed that stupidity, Those are just a few, I know many purist has problems with this overrated movie, so express it here, but be kind, JJ Abrams or some of his lackeys might be reading this and who knows we might give them good advice ! Only those who have a gripe about this dumb movie comment.. ¿

LoL Did you really have to start ANOTHER thread about this dead horse?

P.S. i find it ironic how the haters play the "You're trying to silence the dissent" card and the biggest hater of them all says im not allowed to comment because i liked the movie. Food for thought.

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 7:05 pm

Quote (PhantomCrunk007 @ June 19 2009, 8:00 pm)

Quote (DammitJim6200 @ June 20 2009, 1:37 am) Let's face it, this nut-fest movie from the untalented JJ Abrams is the surprise hit of the year, But clearly this film isen't a hit with some of us fans.. Many times Abrams slap Loyalist and purist in the face claiming the movie isen't for us, "This movie isen't for fans of Star Trek." but he's right, this lame movie isen't for us, he turned Star Trek into a immature, LOUD silly joy ride with no real story or substance, just glitter, Showing no appreciation for the brilliant TOS whatsoever turning Kirk and Spock into two manneqiuns with no personality.. Making Chekov into a silly annoying boy, who shouldn't be no where near a Flagship. Turning a dignified women like Uhura into a desperate, irritating go getter. Not to mention the horrendous new versions of Engineering, the Bridge and the Enterprise itself, clearly and insult to Matt Jefferies. And those STUPID belts they got to carry the Phaser and communicator, Roddenberry would NEVER allowed that stupidity, Those are just a few, I know many purist has problems with this overrated movie, so express it here, but be kind, JJ Abrams or some of his lackeys might be reading this and who knows we might give them good advice ! Only those who have a gripe about this dumb movie comment.. ? LoL Did you really have to start ANOTHER thread about this dead horse? P.S. i find it ironic how the haters play the "You're trying to silence the dissent" card and the biggest hater of them all says im not allowed to comment because i liked the movie. Food for thought.

And for someone who supposedly hates JJ Abrams DJ loves to mention him in every thread he posts. I think he is obsessed with him!

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 10:03 pm

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 10:20 pm

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 11:09 pm

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 11:31 pm

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 20 2009, 11:46 pm

I fourth the Story (alternate universe) nomination

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 21 2009, 12:21 am

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 21 2009, 8:47 am

• Back to Top

Report this Jun. 21 2009, 9:25 am

I voted the iBridge, where are my  But also Engineering was just lame.

Other than those two things I loved this shambolic pile of love and silliness, it had everything else I love about Star Trek

• Back to Top