ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

Alternate realities

bobarino

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 110

Report this Jan. 16 2011, 12:13 pm

Didn't need alernate reality for ST 2009, just better writers. JJ did his best with the garbage they gave him.

Iliana Malek

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6

Report this Jan. 16 2011, 1:27 pm

Quote: switcherdawna @ Jan. 05 2011, 2:57 pm

Who says they couldn't also do something else to change the new timeline again and undo what Nero did.... Wasn't there an episode where some Temporal Police were monitoring and correcting changes in history...?



I could totally see them do a trilogy of movies (since trilogies seem to be the trend), with 1-begin alternate timeline, 2-movie that has nothing to do with previous movie, but still takes place in alternate timeline, 3-something loopy happens, and alternate timeline is obliterated and reset to original timeline.

~I started it tomorrow, I will finish yesterday.~

Ghostmojo

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1826

Report this Jan. 16 2011, 2:10 pm

We need an alterante reality where movie directors go away and invent something new and start a rollercoaster like George Lucas did with Star Wars. But then again why bother when the studio will let you play fast and loose with seasoned and time-proven product?

to boldy go where no man has gone before

Blah Blah Blah

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 13

Report this Feb. 21 2011, 5:59 pm

*facepalm*

cfflpanthers

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 25

Report this Feb. 22 2011, 6:29 am

So what are the prospects of another movie with the new crew and alternate timeline??? I really didn't mind the whole alternate timeline premise as I am also fan of DC Multiverse so how about another movie??? Qapla!!!

trekfan4ever79

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 10

Report this Mar. 11 2011, 8:31 am

as a long time fan of trek over 25 years of my 31 years on this planet, yes the new star trek movie was good


but if tng had 120 million dollar budget things might have turned out diffrent for them. robooting the tos  an throwing away all of treks history grinds my gears o wait we have the Alternate reality thats just a cheap way to say hey trek fans the trek you know is still there. with this new rehash of trek we will never see a movie in the prime time line or a series for that  matter. we will be stuck with this new era for ever


lnagr1

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1403

Report this Mar. 12 2011, 11:46 pm

they just confuse me....

Ayko

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 591

Report this Jun. 17 2011, 4:24 pm

Quote: loveroftrekmen @ May. 16 2009, 12:50 am

>I think that Berman though got quite boring and repeatative.  I like the idea of being able to do anything.  I think it's insulting to old trek fans to try and stay in a used up timeline when we can start something fresh to explore a new love for the show, new connections, and new relations to our loved universe of Trek.


There is one year prior to the Kirk pilot "Where No Man Has Gone Before" and one year between that pilot and the first season of untold Kirk Enterprise adventures. J.J. Abrams is just not a Trekker and Paramount has been invaded by Star Trek haters, obviously.


I always like a challenging challenge.

Ayko

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 591

Report this Jun. 17 2011, 4:28 pm

@Anyacat


How about a chain reaction in the timelines of the past and suddenly we watch new Three Stooges Spacehappy films with Kirky, MoeCoy and Larry Nimoy (Kirky with no hairpiece...)


I always like a challenging challenge.

NCC-1701 Canada

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 92

Report this Sep. 09 2011, 7:10 pm

Quote: Ghostmojo @ Jan. 16 2011, 2:10 pm

>We need an alterante reality where movie directors go away and invent something new and start a rollercoaster like George Lucas did with Star Wars. But then again why bother when the studio will let you play fast and loose with seasoned and time-proven product?


 


Star Trek and Star Wars are two totally different things. And Star Wars is deffinitly the inferior in philosophical view and it making sense over all. Star Trek is like classical music while Star Wars is Rock wand roll. You can't combine them to satisfy them both


" He's not really dead as long as we remember him" - Bones

A Little Otter

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 41

Report this Oct. 24 2011, 2:46 pm

Just as long as no one starts singing "Row Row Row Your Boat."

Eevee_loves_my

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 6

Report this Nov. 08 2011, 1:16 pm

How about putting them in a Saw/star trek movie dont say too fast no but just think of it what would it be like how would the device be looking? I just want your opinion notting more yet


I know that the last movie sucks but the actors ware HOT

ste3we

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 2

Report this Nov. 18 2011, 11:38 am

Quote: /view_profile/ @

>..

Captain Caloocan

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 14

Report this Dec. 07 2011, 8:53 am

If Star Trek '09 is not another timeline but instead an altered timeline then ultimately the movie doesn't really matter. In all of the series and movies the timeline always had to be maintained by either the people involved or corrected by time travel police. Eventually the mess created in the '09 movie will be cleaned up by someone or some group.


I feel fine.

cfflpanthers

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 25

Report this Dec. 07 2011, 9:04 pm

Hey I am just glad I can sign in again. When I have gone to StarTrek.com have been unable to find where to sign in?????

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum