Star Trek

Actually, Nemesis has always been my 3rd favourite Star Trek film.

Overall, I prefer Star Trek '09 to Nemesis simply because I think it's a finer film - but I do like Nemesis quite a bit, the only problems with it as I see things are Tom Hardy's overacting, the extreme "convenience" of the story events, and the fact that some of the best scenes of the film were cut to serve Baird/Berman's odd agenda of making it as leanly action/adventure as possible while leaving in some of the more ridiculous cheesy scenes (for instance: I'd rather have seen the scene with Picard and Data talking about marriage and the future over seeing Worf drunk at Riker/Troi's wedding). I'll take Patrick Stewart and Brent Spiner's acting over anything in Star Trek '09 - but Trek '09 has better cinematography, action, effects, villain, and all-around quality. Still, I have the urge to watch, and have watched, Nemesis more than '09 Trek - and I honestly find it more enjoyable....

So.... What? lol I guess that means I think Trek is a better crafted film but Nemesis gives me more enjoyment, baby.

Tom Hardy did some great acting in NEMESIS.
Shinzon had an interesting history.
It was the most interesting thing about the movie.
But, they just gave us a quick run-down of it.
For the rest of the movie, he's either raping Troi,
whining about avenging the plight of the Remans,
his disdain for being a clone, and in general,
he just wasted time, in and for the movie. It's a shame,
because the concept was cool, but the execution sucked.
It really needed Jonathan Frakes at the helm.