Star Trek

Quote (dryson @ July 28 2009, 1:22 pm)

[QUOTEit not plagism when you quote sources..I not taking credit for Anything, but pointing out that what you saying fly in the face of most of what we know is true at this point. You just cannot ignore Special Relativity, it is a scientific theory that had to be incorporated into Quantum mechanics. Quantum Mechanics is what Solid state Physics is base on. Solid State Physics is responible for the Transistor and microchip. If Special Relativity was incorrect, then we would even be able to have this little debate. So show some proof, at least agrue that back in In 1925 Dayton Miller announced that he had detected a change in velocity of the speed of light, or state the work of J. Magueijo ?and his theory of a variable speed of light. At least they are giving us scientific theories and observation. Neither one has been proven correct, but at least they have agruement that base on scientific reasoning and attempt to prove their point via the scientific method. As for other Website, apparently several of them cannot stomach you either, as your complaint about being banned by Space.com You want Civil debate, then start obeying the rules of the debate and stop with your constant attacks against myself and other members who disagree with you. It is that simple.

Lancer, it is not me that is disobeying any rules of debate nor am I attacking any one. Every post that I have started here you and Grand Lundar continue to post personal attacks when you cannot understand what is being posted. Look back at your post's and figure out that it is you that is conducting the attacks not me, did I say anything about your family or mother or anything like that? Did I say that your ideas were stupid did I call you a dope? No all of these postings relate to you trying to project yourself onto someone else to where they will psychologically appear to be like you so you can control them to make yourself feel kingly when you are not.[/quote]
wrong, every time you post on a topic for the first ¿time, either Lunar or myself tell you how you are wrong. Tell you what scientist know about the subject, which then you have counter posting how we lack either imagination or proof.

We provide proof, and then we call us lairs. We provide additional proof and you then attack us causing us to return your constant belittling with additional taunts..

Actually it seem that this is a great tactic on your part since it allow you to escape having to provide any proof or support for whatever wild idea you come up with...

My hats off to you...

Lancer you are the one who continually attacks people that do not post what you want to hear. My theories are just just theories and jsut because they cannot be proven does not mean that they are legitimate theories.

Can you pose a theory instead of roleplaying like you are the crew from the Planet Killer where you are acting out multiple personalities?

The book Venedetta clearly states what you clinical psychosis is and how the planet destroyer was finally destroyed.

Quote (dryson @ July 28 2009, 4:26 pm)

Lancer you are the one who continually attacks people that do not post what you want to hear. My theories are just just theories and jsut because they cannot be proven does not mean that they are legitimate theories. Can you pose a theory instead of roleplaying like you are the crew from the Planet Killer where you are acting out multiple personalities? The book Venedetta clearly states what you clinical psychosis is and how the planet destroyer was finally destroyed.

no your theories are nonsense along with your little comments on my motives..

I just hate to see people like you butcher science. If you object to my comment, just show me some kind of valid scientific agruement, not a quote from a dictionary or attempt to make this a debate on semantics...

Quote (dryson @ July 29 2009, 3:26 pm)

Lancer you are the one who continually attacks people that do not post what you want to hear. My theories are just just theories and jsut because they cannot be proven does not mean that they are legitimate theories. Can you pose a theory instead of roleplaying like you are the crew from the Planet Killer where you are acting out multiple personalities? The book Venedetta clearly states what you clinical psychosis is and how the planet destroyer was finally destroyed.

Not true.

If my thread on Virtual Particle Pairs is still around, refer to it. My theory was a little out there, lancer came in, stated what he liked and didn't like, and provided his own theory on how to better my design.

Then dryson came in and told me I was wrong and an argument started and blah blah blah.

Everyone here pays attention to the scientific method and the years of painful research conducted by genius' to find out what can best be described as the truth.

If you can't accept that, then lancer is not going to be the only person who "attacks" your ideas. Any new theory presented by you, dryson, would instantly be based on this false model of the universe, that seems to be made up by you and you alone. As such, before even reading it, everyone's gonna know it's trash and start mocking it.

We're not trying to hurt you, dryson. We're trying to help. There's a wealth of information out there, you just have to let go of this strange "faith" you have in your own concepts and start embracing the scientific method, and all that it has taught us!

4_of_20 is right, Dryson.

My attacks aren't intended to be personal; they are directed to the ideas that you present.

Like Lancer, I don't like seeing science butchered, because in today's world, it's under enough attack as it is, with people pushin the anti-vaccine movement, and the creationist/intelligent design movement.

It doesn't help when people read a forum with incorrect information being presented.

Instead of making assumptions about the universe Dryson, you ought to ask more questions instead.
You assume the universe isn't expanding, that it is infinite in age, and claim that our data of such only pertains to the Milky Way galaxy.
This is factually untrue. And there is data to support this.

I have yet to see you provide any backing of your ideas. Where is the evidence? Where is the data?

Without this, you just have ideas, with little or no merit.

Remember this axiom; extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

The Big Bang theory can meet this.
Can your ideas?