ATTENTION: The Boards will be closed permanently on May 28th, 2014. Posting will be disabled on April 28th, 2014. More Info

Prove It

dryson

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 749

Report this Sep. 21 2009, 5:48 pm

Quote
Not even wrong.


This is not even a properly constructed sentence. It is called reverse semantics and the more you talk and write like this Grand Lunar the more degenerated you become. Learn to speak in full explanatory sentences before you respond to a post, but then again maybe you have the same disease that Lancer Omega has. Your problably even a highschool drop out who failed english as well as math.

blankenship

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1632

Report this Oct. 09 2009, 8:41 pm

Quote (GrandLunar2007 @ Sep. 20 2009, 8:48 am)
Quote
This is interesting. Now the reason why the signal only travels at the speed of light is because of the interference of the particles that the signal must travel through prior to reaching it's destination point.


Not even wrong.

It's the bits of space and time that determine the speed of

light.

Think "Framework of reality".

GrandLunar2007

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1092

Report this Oct. 10 2009, 8:31 am

Quote (dryson @ Sep. 21 2009, 5:48 pm)
Quote
Not even wrong.


This is not even a properly constructed sentence. It is called reverse semantics and the more you talk and write like this Grand Lunar the more degenerated you become. Learn to speak in full explanatory sentences before you respond to a post, but then again maybe you have the same disease that Lancer Omega has. Your problably even a highschool drop out who failed english as well as math.

The phrase was coined by a man named Wolfgang Pauli.

Take your issues up with him.

Funny you should question my education level.

Note that it was I that knew what Lance meant when he pointed out QED to you.

And note that it is you that appearently doesn't know the various meanings of prefixes when it comes to orders of magnitude.
Refer to the table in this entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_magnitude

You can see the terms "femto" and "pico", terms that you appearently had no clue about.

Think about this before you insult me again.

GrandLunar2007

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1092

Report this Oct. 10 2009, 8:32 am

Quote (blankenship @ Oct. 09 2009, 8:41 pm)
Quote (GrandLunar2007 @ Sep. 20 2009, 8:48 am)
Quote
This is interesting. Now the reason why the signal only travels at the speed of light is because of the interference of the particles that the signal must travel through prior to reaching it's destination point.


Not even wrong.

It's the bits of space and time that determine the speed of

light.

Think "Framework of reality".

It's really spacetime as a whole that determines light's speed.

Think "Framework of reality".

The 'reality' is where Dryson has his problems.

blankenship

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1632

Report this Oct. 10 2009, 7:19 pm

Quote (GrandLunar2007 @ Oct. 09 2009, 9:32 am)
Quote (blankenship @ Oct. 09 2009, 8:41 pm)
Quote (GrandLunar2007 @ Sep. 20 2009, 8:48 am)
Quote
This is interesting. Now the reason why the signal only travels at the speed of light is because of the interference of the particles that the signal must travel through prior to reaching it's destination point.


Not even wrong.

It's the bits of space and time that determine the speed of

light.

Think "Framework of reality".

It's really spacetime as a whole that determines light's speed.

Think "Framework of reality".

The 'reality' is where Dryson has his problems.

Somebody on here once said that space might be granular.

I'm sitting here moving my hand and I feel a resistance when

starting to move.

Objects at rest tend to stay at rest. Objects in motion

tend to stay in motion.

Maybe those bits of space have to move out of my hand's

way.

Maybe inertia is just matter interacting with space.

Maybe time is slowed for a moving object because time is

Stretched out or slowed by these particles being kind of like a

wave front.

A zone of time refraction maybe.

GrandLunar2007

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1092

Report this Oct. 10 2009, 8:02 pm

:)

Keep in mind, on Earth you're going against air and gravity.
I doubt that in space you'd feel the same resistence.

How does the rest of what you say relate to the speed of light?

blankenship

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1632

Report this Oct. 10 2009, 8:25 pm

Quote (GrandLunar2007 @ Oct. 09 2009, 9:02 pm)
:)

Keep in mind, on Earth you're going against air and gravity.
I doubt that in space you'd feel the same resistence.

How does the rest of what you say relate to the speed of light?

Even in space it takes energy to get things going from a

relative dead stop.

Even in atmosphere there is a lot of space in there

and time is relative between each molecule of air.

About the speed of light? I will think on it.

dryson

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 749

Report this Oct. 12 2009, 1:02 am

Quote
It's really spacetime as a whole that determines light's speed.

Think "Framework of reality".

The 'reality' is where Dryson has his problems.


The only obstacle that a light photon has to overcome is gravity itself, does not gravity affect light?

Now explain to me in depth Grand Lunar what you mean by The 'reality' is where Dryson has his problems? Explain what you mean fully and without adding gender neutral, "it's", "that" ect which only convey a generalized and catch all type sentence structure where you try to fish out of the person a response that you can then try and twist back on them in a austic form of speech to try and trap them in a thought pattern so you can use something against them to make them feel belittled about theirself.

Reality Grand Lunar, the only reality that I ever hear coming out the members of this forum is that this idea cannot be real because it doesn't follow this rule or that rule so the person must be an idiot or that this idea is dumb because someone like Lancer Omega is only concerded about the perceived status of posting on a website.

Before you go calling someone an idiot, you had better look at yourself in the mirror, because you are only projecting an emotion of feeling that you have about yourself where you want the other person to feel like you do so you can have that person sitting in the same boat that you are where you have been made to feel the same way that you are making other's feel because most likely at one time or another you had ideas that seemed interesting to talk about but because they didn't follow mainstream popular notions and took from other's center of attention, those people verbally beat you down until you conformed like they wanted you to just so they could be at the center of attention where they would hand you down scraps to make them even more popular while making you think that you had some insight over someone else.

Beside's this topic is about life on other planets not picha choo bots.

GrandLunar2007

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1092

Report this Oct. 12 2009, 7:29 am

Let me remind you Dryson that you took this thread off topic.

Besides, since it was Blankenship that created this thread, what he says about the content matters, not you.

Did I call you an idiot?
No.
I said you had problems.

You refuse to accept scientific concepts that go against whatever preconceptions you have, including concepts for which there is evidence.

You also project your own faults to other people.
The description you give to me fits your own attitudes.
Otherwise why would you nitpick what I wrote? Do you have something to prove? It's a lame attempt to make yourself seem superior.

4_of_20

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1052

Report this Oct. 13 2009, 1:50 am

It pays to read over a thread again sometimes before posting, doesn't it?

dryson

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 749

Report this Oct. 13 2009, 2:00 pm

Quote
Let me remind you Dryson that you took this thread off topic.

Besides, since it was Blankenship that created this thread, what he says about the content matters, not you.

Did I call you an idiot?
No.
I said you had problems.

You refuse to accept scientific concepts that go against whatever preconceptions you have, including concepts for which there is evidence.

You also project your own faults to other people.
The description you give to me fits your own attitudes.
Otherwise why would you nitpick what I wrote? Do you have something to prove? It's a lame attempt to make yourself seem superior.


Then for that matter then nothing that you post in this topic matters either then. So what if Blakenship started this post. Does that make him a god and that everyone should only listen to what he has to say, it has become very evident Grand Lunar that you are nothing more then a servant to Lancer and others when you cannot contribute anything pertinent to the discussion.

You said it yourself Grand Lunar not I. Just because someone starts of thread topic does not make them the most insitefull person in the post. What you are relating to is following someone as people do in a religious cult.

dryson

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 749

Report this Oct. 13 2009, 2:08 pm

Now back on topic, Life would exist on other planets because of the fact that life exists on Earth. The life that exists throughout the rest of the Universe would be either microbial and in the stage of evolving based on the environmental conditions that would determine the evolutionary rate of the ability to incoporate the thought process of being able to adapt to the environment. The second form of life that exist's in the Universe would be life that has evolved from the microbial state into a form of bipedal motion where appendages have been grown to better facilitate movement and communication.

The third form of life that would exist in the Universe would be  life that has evolved to use advanced communications platforms as wells as vehicles to explore their surroundings other then planet that they live on.

4_of_20

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1052

Report this Oct. 20 2009, 12:36 am

Just like Star Trek ey, dryson?

Recently logged in

Users browsing this forum: FleetAdmiral_BamBam

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum