Captain_Storma GROUP: Members POSTS: 11836  |
Report this
Mar. 15 2008, 1:22 pm
| Quote (_Roadhog_ @ Mar. 15 2008, 10:21 pm) | | Quote (Captain_Storma @ Mar. 15 2008, 9:09 am) | The first part was okay. The second rather soso.
The whole Riker story in #5 and #6 was far too long IMO, it could have been one book, making krad's story a two parter (this one felt rushed). |
I dunno about "rushed", as it was a great lead-in to Articles of the Federation. |
It was great, but the was enough story to fill two books instead of one  |
_Roadhog_ GROUP: Members POSTS: 2279 |
Report this
Mar. 15 2008, 1:25 pm
| Quote (Captain_Storma @ Mar. 15 2008, 5:22 pm) | | Quote (_Roadhog_ @ Mar. 15 2008, 10:21 pm) | | Quote (Captain_Storma @ Mar. 15 2008, 9:09 am) | The first part was okay. The second rather soso.
The whole Riker story in #5 and #6 was far too long IMO, it could have been one book, making krad's story a two parter (this one felt rushed). |
I dunno about "rushed", as it was a great lead-in to Articles of the Federation. |
It was great, but the was enough story to fill two books instead of one |
You ever read Deny Thy Father? If not, you probably would've gotten more out of Greenberger's duology than you did. |
|
Captain_Storma GROUP: Members POSTS: 11836 |
Report this
Mar. 15 2008, 3:19 pm
| Quote (_Roadhog_ @ Mar. 15 2008, 10:25 pm) | | Quote (Captain_Storma @ Mar. 15 2008, 5:22 pm) | | Quote (_Roadhog_ @ Mar. 15 2008, 10:21 pm) | | Quote (Captain_Storma @ Mar. 15 2008, 9:09 am) | The first part was okay. The second rather soso.
The whole Riker story in #5 and #6 was far too long IMO, it could have been one book, making krad's story a two parter (this one felt rushed). |
I dunno about "rushed", as it was a great lead-in to Articles of the Federation. |
It was great, but the was enough story to fill two books instead of one |
You ever read Deny Thy Father?
If not, you probably would've gotten more out of Greenberger's duology than you did. |
No I haven't but I surely will give it a try. |
|
_Roadhog_ GROUP: Members POSTS: 2279 |
Report this
Mar. 15 2008, 6:00 pm
| Quote (captainroe @ Mar. 10 2008, 1:24 pm) | | I actually believe this is the worst ST book I've ever read. |
It was definitely a more "unique" Trek read, in that I couldn't put the book down... I must've finished it in a day or two... and when I was done, in a way I felt like throwing it against a wall, or recycling it or something... |
|
Captain_Storma GROUP: Members POSTS: 11836 |
Report this
Mar. 16 2008, 10:48 am
| Quote (_Roadhog_ @ Mar. 16 2008, 3:00 am) | | Quote (captainroe @ Mar. 10 2008, 1:24 pm) | | I actually believe this is the worst ¿ST book I've ever read. |
It was definitely a more "unique" Trek read, in that I couldn't put the book down... I must've finished it in a day or two...
and when I was done, in a way I felt like throwing it against a wall, or recycling it or something... |
Sounds interesting... |
