Rulerzigzag GROUP: Members POSTS: 285  |
Report this
Sep. 22 2007, 4:59 pm
|
GrandLunar2007 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1092 |
Report this
Sep. 22 2007, 7:08 pm
And if you believe this, I have a nice bridge to sell ya.
|
Josh_Lyman GROUP: Members POSTS: 5520 |
Report this
Sep. 23 2007, 6:06 pm
|
Korban GROUP: Members POSTS: 597 |
Report this
Sep. 24 2007, 1:32 am
Well, if this is true, we've had since 1947 to prepare.....
|
Baratine GROUP: Members POSTS: 2517 |
Report this
Sep. 24 2007, 9:08 am
On the other hand....
Aliens invade, millions killed....
Why wasn't President Bush prepared....
Asks Canada ....
|
IanCrawford GROUP: Members POSTS: 2984 |
Report this
Sep. 24 2007, 9:17 am
Hmn i seriously doubt any invasion is coming up in 2012-- UK goes entirely Digital in 2010, i dont think the world could cope with an invasion of any size. The invasion force would be way past Digital, lol. If we are invaded our best defence would be ground combat probably, what is a nuclear warhead going do to a ship that has just traversed afew thousand light years. They would prob shoot the thing before it even reached them and yawn while doing it haha.
|
SSFPhoenix GROUP: Members POSTS: 527 |
Report this
Sep. 24 2007, 2:22 pm
I can see it now......
Bush " if we lose uh blame that guy that was uh president before me"
minion#1 "what people are we fighting now?"
minion#2 " vulcans."
minion#1 "wtf? are all you nuts? vulcans don't exist."
Bush "they are uh zombie uh vul cans."
minion#2 "I quit....."
|
|
JackCase GROUP: Members POSTS: 11199 |
Report this
Sep. 24 2007, 2:23 pm
LOL Space based defences are  |
|
Korban GROUP: Members POSTS: 597 |
Report this
Sep. 26 2007, 2:04 am
| Quote (IanCrawford @ Sep. 24 2007, 9:17 am) | | Hmn i seriously doubt any invasion is coming up in 2012-- UK goes entirely Digital in 2010, i dont think the world could cope with an invasion of any size. The invasion force would be way past Digital, lol. If we are invaded our best defence would be ground combat probably, what is a nuclear warhead going do to a ship that has just traversed ¿afew thousand light years. They would prob shoot the thing before it even reached them and yawn while doing it haha. |
If we had enough time, we could swap out the smaller yield 1 and 10 megaton devices for the higher yield 100 megatons. And about twenty of those per missile times X number of launch sites.... Unless they can take a few gigatons worth of death per minute, I doubt anything would survive such an onslaught. If they have Point-Defenses and Electronic Counter-Measures that can defeat and spoof the missiles, then is becomes an battle of attrition: all we have to do is overcome their defenses by pouring out the hurt as fast as possible, saturating their PD/ECM systems until a few slip past and hit. Then more will hit and so on until.... KABLOOMY! One dead mothership. Probably a bit costly (monetarily speaking), but it is the best idea I can come up with on a short notice. |
Jarriss GROUP: Members POSTS: 382 |
Report this
Sep. 26 2007, 7:33 pm
Seeing as how we can't do much else, what would we have to lose? The stakes are about the same.
|
|
Baratine GROUP: Members POSTS: 2517 |
Report this
Sep. 26 2007, 8:33 pm
| Quote (Korban @ Sep. 26 2007, 2:04 am) | | Quote (IanCrawford @ Sep. 24 2007, 9:17 am) | | Hmn i seriously doubt any invasion is coming up in 2012-- UK goes entirely Digital in 2010, i dont think the world could cope with an invasion of any size. The invasion force would be way past Digital, lol. If we are invaded our best defence would be ground combat probably, what is a nuclear warhead going do to a ship that has just traversed ?afew thousand light years. They would prob shoot the thing before it even reached them and yawn while doing it haha. |
If we had enough time, we could swap out the smaller yield 1 and 10 megaton devices for the higher yield 100 megatons. And about twenty of those per missile times X number of launch sites....
Unless they can take a few gigatons worth of death per minute, I doubt anything would survive such an onslaught. If they have Point-Defenses and Electronic Counter-Measures that can defeat and spoof the missiles, then is becomes an battle of attrition: all we have to do is overcome their defenses by pouring out the hurt as fast as possible, saturating their PD/ECM systems until a few slip past and hit. Then more will hit and so on until....
KABLOOMY! One dead mothership.
Probably a bit costly (monetarily speaking), but it is the best idea I can come up with on a short notice. |
Is this Mothership in orbit? Low or high... Of course we don't have the missiles to carry warheads into Space. Just near Space and then they fall back to Earth as they were designed. |
|
GrandLunar2007 GROUP: Members POSTS: 1092 |
Report this
Sep. 26 2007, 10:34 pm
We'd probably have to take a warhead and attach it to a larger rocket that'll place it in Earth orbit. It should have another stage to kick it out of orbit to the desired target.
|
|
Rulerzigzag GROUP: Members POSTS: 285 |
Report this
Sep. 27 2007, 2:29 am
No, Bush and Co. don't want to part with their oil. The new information that was withheld from scientists and ancient knowledge that is way overdue. Bush wants to keep us primitive.
The Aliens want to change Earth's infrastructure, we are headed for an economic hell, and Rockefeller would't have approved today.
|
|
Rulerzigzag GROUP: Members POSTS: 285 |
Report this
Sep. 27 2007, 2:31 am
| Quote (Gatefold @ Sep. 27 2007, 4:33 am) | | Quote (Korban @ Sep. 26 2007, 2:04 am) | | Quote (IanCrawford @ Sep. 24 2007, 9:17 am) | | Hmn i seriously doubt any invasion is coming up in 2012-- UK goes entirely Digital in 2010, i dont think the world could cope with an invasion of any size. The invasion force would be way past Digital, lol. If we are invaded our best defence would be ground combat probably, what is a nuclear warhead going do to a ship that has just traversed ?afew thousand light years. They would prob shoot the thing before it even reached them and yawn while doing it haha. |
If we had enough time, we could swap out the smaller yield 1 and 10 megaton devices for the higher yield 100 megatons. And about twenty of those per missile times X number of launch sites....
Unless they can take a few gigatons worth of death per minute, I doubt anything would survive such an onslaught. If they have Point-Defenses and Electronic Counter-Measures that can defeat and spoof the missiles, then is becomes an battle of attrition: all we have to do is overcome their defenses by pouring out the hurt as fast as possible, saturating their PD/ECM systems until a few slip past and hit. Then more will hit and so on until....
KABLOOMY! One dead mothership.
Probably a bit costly (monetarily speaking), but it is the best idea I can come up with on a short notice. |
Is this Mothership in orbit?
Low or high...
Of course we don't have the missiles to carry warheads into Space. Just near Space and then they fall back to Earth as they were designed. |
No fellow Vulcan, they are not in orbit. The UFO's are in orbit. Small ships, 1000 feet across tops. Mother ship's are not in orbit, although they are stationed on the moon as of now. I am speaking to several time travellers that represent the Galactic Federation. Their website is now up, and have a few of them. Scam? No, unlikely. Read it. GOOGLE SEARCH : SECRET SPACE to see NASA footage of our benefactors that have been on our moon for quite some time. The proof is out there, I have it, email me personally if you are interested. |
|
Korban GROUP: Members POSTS: 597 |
Report this
Sep. 27 2007, 3:04 am
| Quote (Gatefold @ Sep. 26 2007, 8:33 pm) | | Quote (Korban @ Sep. 26 2007, 2:04 am) | | Quote (IanCrawford @ Sep. 24 2007, 9:17 am) | | Hmn i seriously doubt any invasion is coming up in 2012-- UK goes entirely Digital in 2010, i dont think the world could cope with an invasion of any size. The invasion force would be way past Digital, lol. If we are invaded our best defence would be ground combat probably, what is a nuclear warhead going do to a ship that has just traversed ?afew thousand light years. They would prob shoot the thing before it even reached them and yawn while doing it haha. |
If we had enough time, we could swap out the smaller yield 1 and 10 megaton devices for the higher yield 100 megatons. And about twenty of those per missile times X number of launch sites....
Unless they can take a few gigatons worth of death per minute, I doubt anything would survive such an onslaught. If they have Point-Defenses and Electronic Counter-Measures that can defeat and spoof the missiles, then is becomes an battle of attrition: all we have to do is overcome their defenses by pouring out the hurt as fast as possible, saturating their PD/ECM systems until a few slip past and hit. Then more will hit and so on until....
KABLOOMY! One dead mothership.
Probably a bit costly (monetarily speaking), but it is the best idea I can come up with on a short notice. |
Is this Mothership in orbit?
Low or high...
Of course we don't have the missiles to carry warheads into Space. Just near Space and then they fall back to Earth as they were designed. |
The larger ICBMs are basically the same as the smaller satellite-carring rockets. Just change the guidance systems alitttle and add some extra fuel. And if the mothership is stupid or arrogant enough, they'll be in low orbit and have to face multipule missiles comming on two differant general bearings (launchers in Russia, China and the US, among other sites), effectively dividing their defences in half. |
