My conclusion to Q1

Q1

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4335

Report this Jul. 26 2002, 1:25 am

Is that right?

Master_Q

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1113

Report this Jul. 26 2002, 1:27 am

Me too! God only knows how many sp. mistakes I have made

The issue
Ok! Great now I can get some sleep! It is relevant in playing a game for example. Rolling the dice you are more likely to get a 7. More #s add up to it from all of the possible combinations of the dice so you are more likely to roll a 7. So it is practical and it true. Its not right on the money its just a prediction. Using the experiment I think there is no way to disprove what I said.

So it was nice debating with you! I hope to get to another time for a different issue and to chat with you more.
I think that it would be funny lets just say for RealSpaceMan because he I had a large debate also on relativity and if its true. He claimed the clock "goofed" which it a atomic clock does not because it uses atoms, molecules, . . . to determine the time. The thing that would be funny if he was on the other side of politics then I think I would exploded and say wow someone that has the opposite scientific, philosophical, and political ideas. Scientific & philosophical do go hand in hand in how people make ideas though.

Well know one seems to like computers that much or something like that. Then there was a post that I asked if you or other members were into computers because a high majority of computer gurus are into ST and I got about 10 re.’s.
So try the thing in DOS under "GUI vs. CLI" its fun or at least I think so. And tell me if it worked or not.

Singing off
Master Q
StarTrek_MasterQ@yahoo.com

Master_Q

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1113

Report this Jul. 26 2002, 1:29 am

The sp.? If thats what you are talking about its "numerical"

Q1

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4335

Report this Jul. 26 2002, 1:33 am

Well, :), when you say modified premisses then whatever the becomes after those premisses are changed is what that object will be. I mean when you change something it’s not the same as it was before. So yes, probability has a role in science but what do we mean by probability when we we’re talking about that probability? I mean scientific probability isn’t the same as Pascal’s probability, because it has different premisses that maintain different viewpoints. I don’t mean to ruin your mood but I had to tell you.

Securitron

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 1309

Report this Jul. 26 2002, 1:35 am

You know if you used MSN or Yahoo or something, this would have been a lot easier. You would haved saved time, and our heads from trying to read all that and understand it.

Q1

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4335

Report this Jul. 26 2002, 1:36 am

You’re the one who wanted to stay in one thread.

Q1

GROUP: Members

POSTS: 4335

Report this Jul. 26 2002, 1:38 am

Sorry, I thought you were Master_Q.

Recently logged in

Users browsing this forum: bunkey, LajkMe, willowtree, Gawain_VIII, Griffalo, Gawain_VIII, Catholic.Fan, Gawain_VIII

Forum Permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum

You cannot reply to topics in this forum

You cannot delete posts in this forum