Q1 GROUP: Members POSTS: 4335 |
Report this
Jul. 26 2002, 1:25 am
Is that right?
|
Master_Q GROUP: Members POSTS: 1113 |
Report this
Jul. 26 2002, 1:27 am
Me too! God only knows how many sp. mistakes I have made
The issue Ok! Great now I can get some sleep! It is relevant in playing a game for example. Rolling the dice you are more likely to get a 7. More #s add up to it from all of the possible combinations of the dice so you are more likely to roll a 7. So it is practical and it true. Its not right on the money its just a prediction. Using the experiment I think there is no way to disprove what I said.
So it was nice debating with you! I hope to get to another time for a different issue and to chat with you more. I think that it would be funny lets just say for RealSpaceMan because he I had a large debate also on relativity and if its true. He claimed the clock "goofed" which it a atomic clock does not because it uses atoms, molecules, . . . to determine the time. The thing that would be funny if he was on the other side of politics then I think I would exploded and say wow someone that has the opposite scientific, philosophical, and political ideas. Scientific & philosophical do go hand in hand in how people make ideas though.
Well know one seems to like computers that much or something like that. Then there was a post that I asked if you or other members were into computers because a high majority of computer gurus are into ST and I got about 10 re.’s. So try the thing in DOS under "GUI vs. CLI" its fun or at least I think so. And tell me if it worked or not.
Singing off Master Q StarTrek_MasterQ@yahoo.com
|
Master_Q GROUP: Members POSTS: 1113 |
Report this
Jul. 26 2002, 1:29 am
The sp.? If thats what you are talking about its "numerical"
|
Q1 GROUP: Members POSTS: 4335 |
Report this
Jul. 26 2002, 1:33 am
Well, :), when you say modified premisses then whatever the becomes after those premisses are changed is what that object will be. I mean when you change something it’s not the same as it was before. So yes, probability has a role in science but what do we mean by probability when we we’re talking about that probability? I mean scientific probability isn’t the same as Pascal’s probability, because it has different premisses that maintain different viewpoints. I don’t mean to ruin your mood but I had to tell you.
|
Securitron GROUP: Members POSTS: 1309 |
Report this
Jul. 26 2002, 1:35 am
You know if you used MSN or Yahoo or something, this would have been a lot easier. You would haved saved time, and our heads from trying to read all that and understand it.
|
Q1 GROUP: Members POSTS: 4335 |
Report this
Jul. 26 2002, 1:36 am
You’re the one who wanted to stay in one thread.
|
Q1 GROUP: Members POSTS: 4335 |
Report this
Jul. 26 2002, 1:38 am
Sorry, I thought you were Master_Q.
|